About us | Advertising | Contact | Get Home Delivery | Archive
Feb 09, 2010 Homepage
News
Business
Interviews
Columnists
Op-Ed
Arts & Culture
Expat Zone
Features
Travel
Leisure
Life
Cartoons
Women
Health Briefs
Weird But True
Sports
Turkish Press Review
Today's think tanks

Turkey in Foreign Press



istanbul hotels

Columnists
LALE KEMAL loglu@todayszaman.com Columnists

Kurdish reform and the military


One of the main reasons for the government’s rather cautious stance towards the Turkish General Staff following the disclosure that a military-related action plan to unseat the ruling authority is authentic is linked to a fear that a radical move in retaliation against itself may trigger the military to end its already weak support of the Kurdish reform process.

Today's interactive toolbox
Bookmark and Share
Video Photo Audio
Send to print Send to my friend
Post your comments
Read comments
Despite increased calls for Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan to retire or sack Chief of General Staff Gen. İlker Başbuğ as well as some other top commanders for their alleged negligence in the preparation of the action plan that involves coup plots in violation of the Constitution, he is pursuing a cautious stance. Instead of taking radical measures, such as retiring or sacking the top generals in a country where the Turkish Armed Forces (TSK) involvement in politics is famous having had five different sorts of military interventions, Erdoğan prefers to await the result of a judiciary process for the clarification of the coup plot plans. He, at the same time, has publicly urged Gen. Başbuğ, without naming him, to hand over those responsible for the action plan to the judiciary.

One of the underlying reasons for Erdoğan’s rather cautious stance in his treatment of the TSK is his fear that sacking or retiring top generals will further complicate the Kurdish reform process intended to end the country’s decades-old problem and which stands as a major obstacle to the improvement of Turkish democracy and the supremacy of the rule of law.

A senior official from the ruling Justice and Development Party (AK Party) recently told me that if top generals are sacked or retired, there is a big possibility that the TSK may publicly announce its withdrawal of the support it has extended to the Kurdish reform process. Such action will further play into the hands of the two main opposition parties who have already pursued policies to sabotage the process rather than allowing it to move forward.

It is also a known fact that the TSK’s support of the process is already weak and can be broken at any time. Government fear over such an above-mentioned development is understandable to a certain extent under Turkish realities. But the AK Party’s rather cautious stance in the face of the abortive coup plots against its democratically elected party and power carry the danger of repetition for such unconstitutional acts to be designed by the TSK in the future.

The Kurdish reform process itself has already faced a break due to the public outrage against the welcoming ceremonies held in the Kurdish-dominated Southeast during the return of 34 people including 8 Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) members from the Kandil Mountains in northern Iraq to Turkey late last month. The return of unarmed PKK members to Turkey from the mountains constitutes an important aspect of the continuation of the reform process. But due to the public outrage in reaction to the highly publicized welcoming ceremonies, there has emerged a tendency within the government to give priority to the return of those Turks of Kurdish origin that have been living in Makhmour camp in northern Iraq for the past 16 years or more. Numbering about 12,000 together with women and children, those citizens fled to northern Iraq in the early 1990s during the peak years of the fight against the outlawed PKK when their villages were evacuated by the state.

Though the occupants of Makhmour are civilians and the camp is under the responsibility of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), it is controlled by members of the PKK and used as a logistics center. The occupants are regularly given lectures by PKK members that Ankara sees as a brainwashing process.

Despite this, occupants of the camp are civilians and they should not return home as they did last month together with members of the PKK.

The return of PKK members living in Europe has also been suspended indefinitely with the priority being given to those in Makhmour. Either before or following the religious holiday later this month, an unidentified number of people from Makhmour are to be persuaded to return to Turkey.

Today, Parliament is scheduled to have a preliminary debate over the Kurdish reform process, which the government named the democratic initiative as it covers a general democratization move.

Despite serious obstacles to the Kurdish reform process due to its extremely complicated nature, it has to work for the sake of Turkey’s stability.

10 November 2009, Tuesday
LALE KEMAL
Comments on this article

Ahmet Emin SEYHAN , Nov 10 2009 21:22, Tuesday
Despite serious obstacles to this democratic initiative has to work for the sake of Turkey’s stability, improvement of T...

Click to read the details of comments
   
Articles of Today
The reason for disgrace
EKREM DUMANLI
Political means versus military measures
LALE KEMAL
Medine was running with boys
NICOLE POPE
The islands of stability
ANDREW FINKEL
Modernity’s instruments
ALİ BULAÇ
Turkish decision-makers’ perceptions about think tanks
HASAN KANBOLAT
The root causes of Turkey’s Kurdish challenge
ÖMER TAŞPINAR
Herding cats
PAT YALE
Reasons of AK Party-MHP row
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK

Other Articles of the Columnist

  Kurdish reform and the military
  EU report on Ergenekon: slap in the face for skeptics
  Erdoğan to visit US on anniversary of Pearl Harbor
  Absence of courage
  Turkish state evolving towards democracy
  Turkey will lose if Kurdish reform process fails
  Cautious optimism on PKK liquidation and the US
  Shift in Turkish military-civilian balance
  Prime Minister Erdoğan draws zigzags
  Military blindness and cross-border operations
  Turkic summit goals should be realistic
  Early elections may be on the horizon
  Turkish state in search of its soul
  As Turkey emerges as a ‘soft power’
  Does Turkey need Patriot missiles?
  Importance of political psychology in healing Kurdish grievances
  Unprecedented disaster and learning lessons
  DTP closure case to finish off Kurdish reforms
  Turkey should change its national security concept
  Former diplomat’s confession of deception
Columnists
ABDULHAMİT BİLİCİ
ABDULLAH BOZKURT
ALİ BULAÇ
ALİ H. ASLAN
AMANDA PAUL
ANDREW FINKEL
ASIM ERDİLEK
AYŞE KARABAT
BEJAN MATUR
BERİL DEDEOĞLU
BERK ÇEKTİR
BÜLENT KENEŞ
BÜLENT KORUCU
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
DOĞU ERGİL
EKREM DUMANLI
EMRE USLU
ETYEN MAHÇUPYAN
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK
FİKRET ERTAN
GÜRKAN ZENGİN
HASAN KANBOLAT
HÜSEYİN GÜLERCE
İBRAHİM KALIN
İBRAHİM ÖZTÜRK
İHSAN DAĞI
İHSAN YILMAZ
KATHY HAMILTON
KERİM BALCI
KLAUS JURGENS
LALE KEMAL
MEHMET KAMIŞ
MICHAEL KUSER
MUHAMMED ÇETİN
MÜMTAZER TÜRKÖNE
NICOLE POPE
ÖMER TAŞPINAR
ORHAN KEMAL CENGİZ
PAT YALE
ŞAHİN ALPAY
SELÇUK GÜLTAŞLI
SUAT KINIKLIOĞLU
YAVUZ BAYDAR