About us | Advertising | Contact | Get Home Delivery | Archive
Mar 20, 2010 Homepage
News
Business
Interviews
Columnists
Op-Ed
Arts & Culture
Expat Zone
Features
Travel
Leisure
Life
Cartoons
Women
Health Briefs
Weird But True
Sports
Turkish Press Review
Today's think tanks
Turkey in Foreign Press

Columnists
BERİL DEDEOĞLU b.dedeoglu@todayszaman.com Columnists

Sanctions and Iran


The US Senate has backed legislation to expand sanctions against Iran in order to curb this country’s nuclear ambitions. The Senate’s bill is different from the text approved in the House of Representatives; thus the two texts must be reconciled before they can become law. Then President Barack Obama will have a supplementary tool to pressure Tehran.

Today's interactive toolbox
Bookmark and Share
Video Photo Audio
Send to print Send to my friend
Post your comments
Read comments
These new economic sanctions especially target Iran’s oil trade. Although Iran possesses the second largest oil reserves in the world, it has serious production and refining problems. Iran’s current infrastructure is not capable of increasing production, and because problems with their refining facilities, Iran must export half of its extraction as crude oil and import fuel.

The legislation aims at denying US loans and other financial assistance to non-Iranian firms that sell fuel to Iran and help expand this country’s oil refining capacities. These new measures were developed believing that considerably increasing fuel prices will exacerbate economic problems and, of course, social unrest. Even if US Secretary of State Hillary R. Clinton insists that they have no intention of punishing the Iranian people, it’s not hard to imagine that it is the people who will suffer the most.

As you may recall, similar sanctions were imposed against Saddam’s Iraq, and as a result, while the people’s misery increased, the regime’s authority remained intact. The foreign world expected for a long time to see domestic turmoil that would drive Saddam out of power, but in the end, they only witnessed Saddam eliminating all pro-Westerners in his country one by one. Of course, finally those who had imposed the sanctions chose to occupy this country, but this final part is definitely not on the agenda concerning Iran.

The US’s plan is to encourage the Iranian opposition movement by amplifying the economic crisis, hoping that the present social uneasiness turns into a tremendous political crisis and costs Mahmoud Ahmadinejad his presidential seat. Washington hopes that maybe then it will be possible to renegotiate the nuclear issue. Even if Ahmadinejad maintain the power, the US believes that he will be so weakened politically that he will have to accept a compromise.

However, Iran’s reaction to these sanctions is hard to predict because, above all, the Iranian people don’t give the impression of being totally convinced on the necessity of dropping the nuclear projects. Ordinary Iranians might even consider these sanctions some kind of declaration of war, and this may even help the government and the opposition form a common front against foreign enemies. On the other hand, it’s not possible to predict the effect or the direction of popular unrest, if it does arise. If this turmoil ignites a process during which Iranians kill each other, how will it be possible to claim that the sanctions were in the Iranian people’s best interests? Besides, even if there is a change of government in Tehran, who can guarantee that the new power will renounce a project that has almost become a symbol of national pride?

It’s worth reminding people that Iran is playing a dangerous game by exposing its military capacities and by using the nuclear issue as a manner of challenging the whole world. Nevertheless, sanctions may incite Iran to adopt a more intransigent line. That’s why new sanctions may not provide the expected results at the cost of making Iran more aggressive, especially if third countries don’t cooperate fully with the US. Perhaps “carrots” will be more useful than “sticks” this time.

03 February 2010, Wednesday
BERİL DEDEOĞLU
   
Articles of Today
The ‘genocide’ problem: states, parliaments and people
BERİL DEDEOĞLU
Greek Cypriots blocking Turkey’s judicial reform
ABDULHAMİT BİLİCİ
Opportunity for judicial reform
MÜMTAZER TÜRKÖNE
Who is who?
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
Either the state or a raven’s carcass
MEHMET KAMIŞ
Let it play out for everyone’s sake
ABDULLAH BOZKURT
‘Model partner’ or ‘genocide offender’?
GÜRKAN ZENGİN
Can (Turkish) soccer hooliganism be stopped?
KLAUS JURGENS
A small package but a big step for democracy
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK

Other Articles of the Columnist

  Sanctions and Iran
  Multilateralism and Afghanistan
  Nigerian army & ‘war games’
  People try to survive; what about states?
  Can’t see the forest for the trees
  Israel-Turkey: lessons of a crisis
  Protection by the wall, protection from the wall
  Let’s throw Turkey off the EU path!
  A silent diplomacy
  Iran as a global issue
  An evaluation of the past year
  The Turkey-Syria model
  Visa wars
  Egypt-Turkey: the new quest
  The party ban and responsibility
  Expecting something from terror
  PKK brings US and Turkey closer
  Terror in Russia
  Switzerland: an airspace free of minarets
  Turkish-Arab dialogue
Columnists
ABDULHAMİT BİLİCİ
ABDULLAH BOZKURT
ALİ BULAÇ
ALİ H. ASLAN
AMANDA PAUL
ANDREW FINKEL
ASIM ERDİLEK
AYŞE KARABAT
BEJAN MATUR
BERİL DEDEOĞLU
BERK ÇEKTİR
BÜLENT KENEŞ
BÜLENT KORUCU
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
DOĞU ERGİL
EKREM DUMANLI
EMRE USLU
ETYEN MAHÇUPYAN
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK
FİKRET ERTAN
GÜRKAN ZENGİN
HASAN KANBOLAT
HÜSEYİN GÜLERCE
İBRAHİM KALIN
İBRAHİM ÖZTÜRK
İHSAN DAĞI
İHSAN YILMAZ
KATHY HAMILTON
KERİM BALCI
KLAUS JURGENS
LALE KEMAL
MEHMET KAMIŞ
MICHAEL KUSER
MUHAMMED ÇETİN
MÜMTAZER TÜRKÖNE
NICOLE POPE
ÖMER TAŞPINAR
ORHAN KEMAL CENGİZ
PAT YALE
ŞAHİN ALPAY
SELÇUK GÜLTAŞLI
SUAT KINIKLIOĞLU
YAVUZ BAYDAR