About us | Advertising | Contact | Get Home Delivery | Archive
Mar 20, 2010 Homepage
News
Business
Interviews
Columnists
Op-Ed
Arts & Culture
Expat Zone
Features
Travel
Leisure
Life
Cartoons
Women
Health Briefs
Weird But True
Sports
Turkish Press Review
Today's think tanks
Turkey in Foreign Press

Columnists
BERİL DEDEOĞLU b.dedeoglu@todayszaman.com Columnists

Nigerian army & ‘war games’


What is going on in Nigeria has once again shown us what people must endure when their country is misgoverned. A dispute between two landowners, one Muslim and the other Christian, in the Jos Plateau, turned into a real armed conflict between communities and left hundreds dead.

Today's interactive toolbox
Bookmark and Share
Video Photo Audio
Send to print Send to my friend
Post your comments
Read comments
The federal government then sent the army to restore order, which halted the violence, and then the death count began: 288 people were massacred during the unrest, and the bodies of 150 of the victims have been found in wells and sewage pits.

Almost half of the 150 million inhabitants of this country are Muslim, and they generally live in the northern regions, struggling with extreme poverty. Jos lies at the point where the Muslim North and the Christian South meet. Deadly riots, exacerbated by old rooted disagreements over farmland, have been going on since 2001 in this area between the two communities, and approximately 60 people are killed every day.

Following independence in 1960, parties dominated by Muslims won elections but Christian-supported political formations rejected the results because of alleged irregularities. Finally, a military coup took place to ensure public order. Meanwhile, the southeast regions seceded under the name of the Republic of Biafra, sparking a bloody civil war. Niger and Cameroon also contributed to this chaotic atmosphere, but finally the central government crushed the rebellion in 1970, at the cost of 1 million dead.

Lurching from one military coup to another, Nigeria held several elections in 1979, 1984, 1990, 1992, 1998 and 2003 in order to return to civilian rule, but after each election, another coup took place on the grounds of political instability. In this country, where antagonistic ethnic and religious identities live together and where the majority of the population is very poor despite rich petroleum resources, in other words, where every condition for a civil war exists, domestic violence erupts without the need to implement complicated provocative plans. What is important is that although military coups were done in order to stop the violence, they only caused more violence and suffering. This increased violence called other generals to duty, and the vicious circle went on and on, while millions lost their lives without being noticed by the international community.

After having reviewed all these facts, it becomes harder to understand how elsewhere, in countries where civil war is not very plausible and the risk of war is minimal, coup simulations, such as those we heard of recently, can be conducted. Maybe the objective of these military coup attempts and simulations is to instill the fear that a military coup could create without having to actually overthrow the government. In this context, social disintegration is assured, even in the absence of a real coup. It appears that these simulations also intend to teach the people who their domestic enemies are, what these enemies’ connections with foreign countries are and thus what countries are our enemies.

A glance at Nigerian history may provide us far more information than hour-long coup simulations. It’s sad to see that those who organize these kinds of simulations do not bother to think thoroughly about just how much harm their actions, which, according to them, aim to “save the country,” may bring to the country. However, contemplating about the outcomes of such actions is the politicians’ responsibility, too. Civilian institutions and politicians must abandon the mentality of using the military to perform their political maneuvers. If not, everyone will be on the losing side.

27 January 2010, Wednesday
BERİL DEDEOĞLU
   
Articles of Today
The ‘genocide’ problem: states, parliaments and people
BERİL DEDEOĞLU
Greek Cypriots blocking Turkey’s judicial reform
ABDULHAMİT BİLİCİ
Opportunity for judicial reform
MÜMTAZER TÜRKÖNE
Who is who?
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
Either the state or a raven’s carcass
MEHMET KAMIŞ
Let it play out for everyone’s sake
ABDULLAH BOZKURT
‘Model partner’ or ‘genocide offender’?
GÜRKAN ZENGİN
Can (Turkish) soccer hooliganism be stopped?
KLAUS JURGENS
A small package but a big step for democracy
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK

Other Articles of the Columnist

  Nigerian army & ‘war games’
  People try to survive; what about states?
  Can’t see the forest for the trees
  Israel-Turkey: lessons of a crisis
  Protection by the wall, protection from the wall
  Let’s throw Turkey off the EU path!
  A silent diplomacy
  Iran as a global issue
  An evaluation of the past year
  The Turkey-Syria model
  Visa wars
  Egypt-Turkey: the new quest
  The party ban and responsibility
  Expecting something from terror
  PKK brings US and Turkey closer
  Terror in Russia
  Switzerland: an airspace free of minarets
  Turkish-Arab dialogue
  Iran: a new phase in the nuclear crisis
  What about an initiative from the people?
Columnists
ABDULHAMİT BİLİCİ
ABDULLAH BOZKURT
ALİ BULAÇ
ALİ H. ASLAN
AMANDA PAUL
ANDREW FINKEL
ASIM ERDİLEK
AYŞE KARABAT
BEJAN MATUR
BERİL DEDEOĞLU
BERK ÇEKTİR
BÜLENT KENEŞ
BÜLENT KORUCU
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
DOĞU ERGİL
EKREM DUMANLI
EMRE USLU
ETYEN MAHÇUPYAN
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK
FİKRET ERTAN
GÜRKAN ZENGİN
HASAN KANBOLAT
HÜSEYİN GÜLERCE
İBRAHİM KALIN
İBRAHİM ÖZTÜRK
İHSAN DAĞI
İHSAN YILMAZ
KATHY HAMILTON
KERİM BALCI
KLAUS JURGENS
LALE KEMAL
MEHMET KAMIŞ
MICHAEL KUSER
MUHAMMED ÇETİN
MÜMTAZER TÜRKÖNE
NICOLE POPE
ÖMER TAŞPINAR
ORHAN KEMAL CENGİZ
PAT YALE
ŞAHİN ALPAY
SELÇUK GÜLTAŞLI
SUAT KINIKLIOĞLU
YAVUZ BAYDAR