|
 |
|
|
|
In February 1998, the Turkish military invited me on a trip to the southeast of Turkey, and in retrospect it is a journey that changed my life.
|
|
The purpose of the excursion was to impress a group of foreign correspondents with the success of a hearts and minds campaign to win over the people of the region. No longer were the military behaving as if they were an occupying power, but they were painting schools, handing out clothes to the needy and just in general trying to be nice. We even watched a video of an officer having a friendly meal with captured members of the PKK. Our own trip got off to a similarly convivial start with lunch in the officers mess in Diyarbakir. This was a building I had picked my way around warily during my years of reporting from the region and which I had not visited previously or since. The person I sat next to was witty and informative and full of insights into the geopolitics of what (in that cold winter) seemed to be an impending war against Saddam Hussein. So when the name of Çetin Doğan came up this week in the press as the general in charge of an enormous exercise to bring about the overthrow of the elected government with some really violent dirty tricks, I thought it rang a bell. I summoned up the story I had written for The Times, and lo and behold… The trip took us to Sirnak and beyond, places whose pain and conflict I had witnessed in the early 1990s. When I returned to Istanbul I wrote in my column for the Sabah newspaper my hope that things had really changed and that people would have the freedom to talk about the recent past. “The fear in Sirnak is not being able to call for reconciliation without being accused and intimidated by both sides,” I wrote at the time. The result was not quite what I anticipated. The public prosecutor was not impressed by my column and asked that I be imprisoned for six years for causing the military to be held in disrepute. My subsequent trial attracted a fair amount of publicity even though I was never in real danger of being tossed into jail. Indeed, by the time I appeared in the dock I had already been dismissed from Sabah at the direct request (I later learned) of the National Security Council (MGK) for yet another column. My conclusion from these experiences was not anger at the judiciary, which tried me fairly under a stupid law, but my Turkish newspaper, which did not even report on the case. It occurred to me then that the lack of freedom in the press for which Turkey has been so much criticized was very much a self-inflicted wound. It is a view that makes even better sense in a week in which we have been presented with a long list of journalists whom the coup plotters assumed could be relied upon to support a coup and a much shorter list of those who might be expected to kick up a fuss. I am not in favor of encouraging a McCarthy-style witch hunt of those who appear on one list and not another, but how different might the last decades in Turkey have been if its newspapers had stood up for freedom of speech instead of bending in the direction of whatever wind was blowing at the time. And it is still going on. Little noticed in the brouhaha about preparations for a coup is a report from the media freedom monitor for the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), criticizing Turkey for blocking access to some 3,700 Internet sites for “arbitrary and political reasons” and urging that it reform or abolish the relevant law (no. 5651). The amazing thing about this week’s coup revelations is not just the shocking lack of respect for human life that the plotters showed -- at the very least on paper -- but that they originate from a small, penniless newspaper that merely spoke its mind.
|
| 24 January 2010, Sunday |
| ANDREW FINKEL |
|
|
|
 |
Comments on this article
|
-
|
Mustafa Turkmen , Jan 24 2010 12:01, Sunday
|
|
|
|
Jefferey E. Anderson , Jan 24 2010 05:45, Sunday
|
|
|
Click to read the details of comments
|
|
|
|