|
 |
|
|
|
Following the escalation of violence in Turkey over the past days, with sympathizers of the outlawed Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) and pro-Kurdish Democratic Society Party (DTP) taking to the streets to protest the prison conditions of PKK leader Abdullah Öcalan, and the deaths of seven soldiers in a terrorist attack in Tokat on Monday, many think that the end of the road is in sight for the Justice and Development Party (AK Party) government’s Kurdish initiative.
|
|
The initiative, launched this summer, seeks to find a peaceful solution to Turkey’s Kurdish problem. Hopes for the Kurdish initiative faded further when the DTP’s hawkish leader, Emine Ayna, announced that her party was withdrawing support from the initiative process, which she said aimed to eliminate her party. During their parliamentary group meetings on Tuesday, Republican People’s Party (CHP) leader Deniz Baykal and Nationalist Movement Party (MHP) Chairman Devlet Bahçeli, who were against the initiative from the very beginning, asked the government to end the process. In consideration of all this, many now question whether the initiative process has come to an end and the possible risks of ending this process, which aims to solve Turkey’s most serious problem. Sabah’s Nazlı Ilıcak, looking at the feeling prevailing among opposition parties about the end of the initiative process on the grounds that cooperation between the AK Party and the DTP has been spoiled, says they miss the point of the initiative as she adds, “Certainly, views will be exchanged with the DTP, even Öcalan’s views regarding the process can be sought behind closed doors but the target of this initiative is the public itself, the Kurdish citizens of this country.” Ilıcak suggests that the initiative process should continue so that more soldiers are not martyred. “The government did not say, ‘Let’s try a Kurdish initiative’ when everything was perfect in Turkey. Security measures have not been shelved during this process and social, cultural and economic steps have been taken that will relieve the Kurdish public and strengthen their commitment to the nation during this process,” explains Ilıcak, stressing the importance of the continuation of this process. Describing the attack in Tokat as an obvious provocation which aims to block the initiative process, Star’s Mustafa Karaalioğlu thinks those who are clever enough to see this and able to make an analysis of the events should not rejoice like Bahçeli and Baykal, saying, “The initiative process has finally ended.” He says a problem whose history is packed with blood cannot be solved in a single day and that time and patience are needed for its solution. “It is useful for those who are happy at the prospect of the end of the initiative and side with the CHP, MHP and DTP to follow the solution process without excitement. The lack of a solution means a painful process, just as in the past,” remarks Karaalioğlu. Criticizing those who hold the initiative process responsible for the rise of tension in the country, Sabah’s Mahmut Övür says the real cause of the chaos in Turkey is actually an opposition mentality which defends the “old Turkey.”
|
| 11 December 2009, Friday |
| FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|