About us | Advertising | Contact | Get Home Delivery | Archive
Mar 20, 2010 Homepage
News
Business
Interviews
Columnists
Op-Ed
Arts & Culture
Expat Zone
Features
Travel
Leisure
Life
Cartoons
Women
Health Briefs
Weird But True
Sports
Turkish Press Review
Today's think tanks
Turkey in Foreign Press

Columnists
YAVUZ BAYDAR y.baydar@todayszaman.com Columnists

‘The final phase’


The so-called “document crisis”  has entered a more critical phase with recent powerful statements by Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. In a TV interview on Sunday, Erdoğan commented extensively on where he stands on the controversy of the document, prepared and signed by a colonel at the General Staff.

Today's interactive toolbox
Bookmark and Share
Video Photo Audio
Send to print Send to my friend
Post your comments
Read comments
He also commented on the threat of a coup and on civilian-military relations in general. The choice of words and the nature of the content gave us many new clues about the ongoing battle for power between the government and the top command. It will intensify.

The statements follow similar, “indirect” calls by the prime minister to his top commander to obey the law and cooperate in the investigation on the controversial document, whose nature is clearly intended to engineer politics toward undemocratic territory by waging psychological warfare against the government.

It seems rather clear that there is a disagreement on the cooperation. Erdoğan sees the big picture, as revealed by a powerful core of commentators in the left, liberal and post-Islamist segments, and legal experts. For days, he has been strictly warned that a “retreat” from the position on the side of the civilian rule of law would lead him to the same fate as one of his predecessors, Süleyman Demirel. Examples from the past -- the ‘70s and ‘80s -- were given. He knows that other predecessors such as Tansu Çiller, Erdal İnönü and Mesut Yılmaz were cunningly transformed into puppets acting as prime ministers in their careers, forced to ignore severe violations of human rights, reforms and democratic progress.

Erdoğan seems aware, too, that a “political retreat” such as in the infamous Şemdinli incident (during which a civilian prosecutor investigating and charging high-ranking officers in a dubious bombing case was disbarred from all duty, even as a defense lawyer) will mean a defeat within his party, a loss of support in votes and possibly a division of the Justice and Development Party (AK Party).

From that perspective, the prime minister is determined to “go to the very end.” He made clear on Sunday that if or when he is faced with an undemocratic threat, he “will not take [his] hat [a reference to the behavior of Demirel] and go away.” He implied that he will do whatever it takes in the name of the will of the people.

In between the lines, a roadmap appears: The prime minister revealed that he had all possibilities researched, in the case of the dismissal of his top commander, if he refuses to cooperate. He hinted to journalists that he may even face a legal battle because a dismissed top commander can object to such a decision in an Administrative Court. Nevertheless, this means that the office of the prime minister is seriously considering harsh measures. This is unique, and if it reaches that stage it will be equal to a soft revolution.

It is rather strange that a prime minister in a country asks for days, almost begs, his top commander to hand over officers and soldiers for preparing and eventually destroying documents targeting, in detailed plans, the constitutional order. He does this publicly, in almost every platform. This means a sharp contrast is there, and he is not going to wait forever.

Meanwhile, the drama in the public eye reaches ridiculous proportions when the suspect officer, Col. Dursun Çiçek, remains on duty, refuses to appear before civilian prosecutors and asserts his innocence in interviews published by some newspapers.

It is a crisis. Officers are defying the law, amended by the government, and the military lawyers are apparently deliberately misinterpreting the law, defending the no-show of army members before civilian courts. This, in turn, portrays a powerful institution, insisting on staying on the murky side of the rule of law. The prime minister cannot live with that forever because time will work against him.

The top commander, Gen. İlker Başbuğ, is at a crossroads. He knows that the outcome of a final confrontation -- soft or hard -- depends entirely on his chosen behavior. It is clear he feels cornered. The widespread conviction among experts is that he “knew” about the existence of the document(s).

At the moment, he invests in delaying. It is highly possible the advice given to him by uniformed experts is that the application by the Republican People’s Party (CHP) on the amended law, severely restricting the jurisdiction of the military courts, may be “accelerated” by the Constitutional Court, which is expected to reverse it and send it back to Parliament. This will invalidate the law until a new vote. Meanwhile, the military prosecution will feel empowered to take over the entire case, possibly with Şemdinli in mind.

It will be exciting to see on whose side time is on. One thing is clear: The ultimate power game has entered its last phase and it is bound for a resolution in the favor of one side only.

11 November 2009, Wednesday
YAVUZ BAYDAR
   
Articles of Today
The ‘genocide’ problem: states, parliaments and people
BERİL DEDEOĞLU
Greek Cypriots blocking Turkey’s judicial reform
ABDULHAMİT BİLİCİ
Opportunity for judicial reform
MÜMTAZER TÜRKÖNE
Who is who?
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
Either the state or a raven’s carcass
MEHMET KAMIŞ
Let it play out for everyone’s sake
ABDULLAH BOZKURT
‘Model partner’ or ‘genocide offender’?
GÜRKAN ZENGİN
Can (Turkish) soccer hooliganism be stopped?
KLAUS JURGENS
A small package but a big step for democracy
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK

Other Articles of the Columnist

  ‘The final phase’
  Al-Bashir is a test for credibility
  Miliband, Erdoğan and Papandreou can help deliver
  ‘End of an era’
  Another taboo out the way: new page with Iraqi Kurdistan
  Don’t smoke in bed
  ‘Piece of paper’ ends military’s myth
  ‘The AKP sees big’
  Israel lags behind the changing reality
  ‘Homecoming’ is neither defeat nor victory
  News from the Bosphorus Conference
  The broader picture with Russia
  A letter six pages too long
  ‘Not the same anymore’
  Open letter to George Papandreou
  Upside down
  Congress of crossroads
  An encounter well attended, well needed
  What the FDP might and might not do
  Gestures without conditions
Columnists
ABDULHAMİT BİLİCİ
ABDULLAH BOZKURT
ALİ BULAÇ
ALİ H. ASLAN
AMANDA PAUL
ANDREW FINKEL
ASIM ERDİLEK
AYŞE KARABAT
BEJAN MATUR
BERİL DEDEOĞLU
BERK ÇEKTİR
BÜLENT KENEŞ
BÜLENT KORUCU
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
DOĞU ERGİL
EKREM DUMANLI
EMRE USLU
ETYEN MAHÇUPYAN
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK
FİKRET ERTAN
GÜRKAN ZENGİN
HASAN KANBOLAT
HÜSEYİN GÜLERCE
İBRAHİM KALIN
İBRAHİM ÖZTÜRK
İHSAN DAĞI
İHSAN YILMAZ
KATHY HAMILTON
KERİM BALCI
KLAUS JURGENS
LALE KEMAL
MEHMET KAMIŞ
MICHAEL KUSER
MUHAMMED ÇETİN
MÜMTAZER TÜRKÖNE
NICOLE POPE
ÖMER TAŞPINAR
ORHAN KEMAL CENGİZ
PAT YALE
ŞAHİN ALPAY
SELÇUK GÜLTAŞLI
SUAT KINIKLIOĞLU
YAVUZ BAYDAR