About us | Advertising | Contact | Get Home Delivery | Archive
Mar 18, 2010 Homepage
News
Business
Interviews
Columnists
Op-Ed
Arts & Culture
Expat Zone
Features
Travel
Leisure
Life
Cartoons
Women
Health Briefs
Weird But True
Sports
Turkish Press Review
Today's think tanks
Turkey in Foreign Press

Columnists
HÜSEYİN GÜLERCE h.gulerce@todayszaman.com Columnists

Junta supporters and Başbuğ


The original signed copy of the document betraying democracy and the nation is the second milestone after the Ergenekon case in the democratization of the country. Turkey will never be the same again. Why is this document, which was prepared by a junta in the General Staff headquarters, a document that betrays democracy and the nation?

Today's interactive toolbox
Bookmark and Share
Video Photo Audio
Send to print Send to my friend
Post your comments
Read comments
There are four key elements in the document: 1) Activities to undermine the Justice and Development Party (AK Party) on the grounds that it seeks a regime based on religious principles. 2) Interfering in the Ergenekon case; spreading the impression that arrested retired and active duty military officers are innocent; spreading news that they were jailed for fighting against terrorism and reactionaryism. 3) The importance of propaganda projects by the media, which is considered a top ally, as well as matters that should be covered by the news. 4) Provocations and conspiracies against the Fethullah Gülen movement. Having some names described as “elements in waiting” carry out reactionary activities and then blaming the Gülen community for it; calling in to live radio and television programs pretending to be a member of the community and agitating the public by making statements such as “anyone that messes with us is a supporter of Ergenekon; no one has the strength to beat us”; placing weapons in certain student homes along with documents, papers and objects related to Judaism, the CIA, Mossad, the Unification Church and Khomeini, informing the police and having these homes raided by the gendarmerie; also planting documents and information that incite Alevi hostility; conducting raids on ışık evleri (student residences) within the scope of a military crime, declaring the existence of a “pro-Fethullah armed terror organization” and enabling the military judiciary to intervene.

Forget mentioning how they betrayed democracy, could we say these junta members, regardless of their titles and positions, who made such plans even had a conscience or sense of justice? The Turkish Armed Forces (TSK) is the nation’s army. What are these plans all about? A mentality that has been dealing a blow to democracy every 10 years since May 27, 1960 has virtually entered the genetic codes of some military officers.

It passes on from generation to generation. They train, protect and support each other within the army, and they have absolutely no tolerance for accepting democracy. The generals in the TSK are weakening their own institutions. They reckon that the unlawfulness and recklessness transpiring in front of the entire nation is unimportant. “The truth is whatever we say it is. We are above everything. We do not give account; we call on others to give account,” they say. Junta supporters put the Chief of General Staff Gen. İlker Başbuğ in the most difficult spot. During a press conference organized on April 29, Başbuğ confidently said: “As the Turkish Armed Forces, we respect democracy, the democratic regime and the state of law, and we are committed to it. Therefore, no one who deviates from the current democratic regime will find a place for himself in the TSK, and I say this very openly: We will not tolerate it. That is out of the question.”

This is the word of a commander. People want to believe in his word. But how is it possible for a document that betrays democracy to be prepared on the same floor as his office? Former Chief of General Staff Gen. Yaşar Büyükanıt had admitted that he personally wrote the e-memorandum aiming to interfere in the presidential elections. How is that document a commitment to democracy and the state of law?

 There is something going wrong for the TSK. There is a confidence problem occurring between the army and the nation. Neither the TSK, democracy nor the republic, which is celebrating its 86th anniversary today, can carry this burden. The original copy of the document has turned into a giant snowball and is falling down from the mountain. It is getting bigger and will eventually turn into an avalanche. Many people will be left underneath it. All eyes are on Başbuğ. Will he show the courage to open the way for a democratic Turkey that has been freed from coup planners by surrendering the members of the junta to the law?

29 October 2009, Thursday
HÜSEYİN GÜLERCE
Comments on this article

Christoph , Oct 29 2009 03:09, Thursday
Utterly appalling how the Turkish military operates outside the constraints of civilian elected officials. This is total...

Click to read the details of comments
   
Articles of Today
Turkey and the SIPRI report
LALE KEMAL
Five questions for Mr. Başbuğ
HÜSEYİN GÜLERCE
Constructive ambiguity and destructive obscurity
KERİM BALCI
Will Turkey ever walk alone?
ANDREW FINKEL
Islam, democracy and Turkey
İBRAHİM KALIN
Wanted: democratic opposition in Turkey
MUHAMMED ÇETİN
Spring fever
PAT YALE
A direct intervention in the judiciary
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK

Other Articles of the Columnist

  Junta supporters and Başbuğ
  Deep initiative
  Success of the opening depends on maturity of reasonable majority
  They are not pipes, EU Progress Report says
  Initiative opponents don’t stand a chance
  An error made at the headquarters
  Oh my poor Ceylan
  One writer’s journey from the ‘chateau’ to the pages of Hürriyet
  Would you murder your own children?
  Ergenekon case destroys status quo
  Why have Ergenekon supporters lost?
  Kurdish issue will be solved by Turks’ collective conscience
  When you look at the initiative from Diyarbakir…
  A judiciary seeking to function like the military
  Ertuğrul Özkök’s umrah
  Let us not push the tired one uphill
  What did you do to our henna-adorned soldiers, lieutenant?
  Initiative can’t progress with those unable to hold their tongue
  Who will come, who will go?
  They have arrived and the wait is over
Columnists
ABDULHAMİT BİLİCİ
ABDULLAH BOZKURT
ALİ BULAÇ
ALİ H. ASLAN
AMANDA PAUL
ANDREW FINKEL
ASIM ERDİLEK
AYŞE KARABAT
BEJAN MATUR
BERİL DEDEOĞLU
BERK ÇEKTİR
BÜLENT KENEŞ
BÜLENT KORUCU
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
DOĞU ERGİL
EKREM DUMANLI
EMRE USLU
ETYEN MAHÇUPYAN
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK
FİKRET ERTAN
GÜRKAN ZENGİN
HASAN KANBOLAT
HÜSEYİN GÜLERCE
İBRAHİM KALIN
İBRAHİM ÖZTÜRK
İHSAN DAĞI
İHSAN YILMAZ
KATHY HAMILTON
KERİM BALCI
KLAUS JURGENS
LALE KEMAL
MEHMET KAMIŞ
MICHAEL KUSER
MUHAMMED ÇETİN
MÜMTAZER TÜRKÖNE
NICOLE POPE
ÖMER TAŞPINAR
ORHAN KEMAL CENGİZ
PAT YALE
ŞAHİN ALPAY
SELÇUK GÜLTAŞLI
SUAT KINIKLIOĞLU
YAVUZ BAYDAR