About us | Advertising | Contact | Get Home Delivery | Archive
Mar 21, 2010 Homepage
News
Business
Interviews
Columnists
Op-Ed
Arts & Culture
Expat Zone
Features
Travel
Leisure
Life
Cartoons
Women
Health Briefs
Weird But True
Sports
Turkish Press Review
Today's think tanks
Turkey in Foreign Press

Columnists
KERİM BALCI k.balci@todayszaman.com Columnists

Turkey’s Israel policy consistent with global role


Last week I interviewed a rather interesting Israeli politician who is known in Turkey only with negative connotations. Majalli Whbee is a Druze member and deputy speaker of the Israeli Parliament. A long time associate of former Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, Whbee is known, even at home, as “more monarchist than the king.”

Today's interactive toolbox
Bookmark and Share
Video Photo Audio
Send to print Send to my friend
Post your comments
Read comments
His name came to Turkey’s agenda with his not-so-hidden threat that Israel may “recognize the Armenian-related events as genocide” if Erdoğan says that genocide is taking place in Gaza. In our interview, Whbee claimed that this was a misquotation of what he said. What he said can be summarized as: “We saw in Turkey a strategic partner, an ally in the region, and I hope that this will continue so. But if the Turkish prime minister continues to attack Israel and to send signals that he is not interested in cooperating with Israel, this is not the end of the world. We managed for 61 years without Turkey, and we will continue to do so.”

Whbee thinks that the anger on the Israeli side about Erdoğan’s remarks stems, to a certain extent, from the trust and reliance the Israelis placed on the Turkish people and their prime minister. “We gave to the Turkish prime minister a role we didn’t entrust to any other world leader: mediating between us and Syria. That is to say, we saw a reliable office in Turkey, a neutral mediator,” he told me.

Whbee does not want to see that the precondition of reliability is necessary for all the participants of an international give-and-take negotiation. It was not Turkey that lost its “reliability” first. The visit of Ehud Olmert to Ankara could have served Israeli-Syrian normalization and the upgrading of Turkish-Israeli relations at the same time if it had not been followed by the Israeli operations in Gaza. Whbee does not accept any fault on the side of Israel: “Israel wouldn’t come and ask for permission from Turkey, of course!” he said to me.

Well, Turkey wouldn’t come and ask for permission while broadcasting the TV series that hurt the Israelis, then. Israelis should understand that the Israeli oppression in Gaza is as disturbing to Turkey as the “Ayrılık” series is to Israel.

That is not to say that it was a wise decision to broadcast “Ayrılık.” What is done in Palestine is already wrong enough. It doesn’t need any exaggeration in order to attract public attention. I do not recall hearing of any occasion where an Israeli soldier shot a newborn baby being held in its father’s arms. But we all remember Waad, the 10-day-old baby who died under the ruins of a building in south Lebanon bombed Israeli fighting planes. We all remember the awful fate of Muhammad al-Durra, who was shot at the side of his father. We all remember the baby with the blue pacifier who died under a building in Gaza. We all remember Rachel Corrie, who was crushed to death under an Israeli bulldozer. As the Turkish foreign minister said, “We cannot behave as if all this didn’t happen.” But we didn’t need a TV series that agitated the feelings of the general public with what seems to be a symbolic story of brutality composed of elements taken from different tragedies.

Even if we conceive of “Ayrılık” as dirty propaganda, that does not justify what Israel did in Gaza.

But Whbee thinks that everything done in Gaza is justified and if somebody is to be blamed for the occasional civilian casualties, it is Hamas, which opts to launch Qassam rockets from amidst the civilian population.

It is only natural that a politician justifies the acts of his or her national army. I wouldn’t expect an Israeli politician to come out and endorse the Goldstone report, which accuses Israel, together with Hamas, of war crimes. But it is to the good of Turkish-Israeli relations that Israel should realize the new realities of Turkish foreign policy, which is becoming more and more European and more and more conditioned on the domestic politics of the country.

Turkey is becoming more audible in its foreign policy positions. It is not the so-called “rage episodes” of the Turkish prime minister that end with crescendos of Turkish-Israeli bickering. That is a “fringe benefit” of becoming a regional superpower that needs to have a position on regional political issues, all of which have global implications.

There is no chance for Israel to “manage another 61 years” without Turkey. Israel should learn how to manage with this new Turkish reality.

27 October 2009, Tuesday
KERİM BALCI
Comments on this article

vilgod , Oct 28 2009 14:13, Wednesday
To Hamidullah: I am afraid I do not find any of your answers very convincing. Just because you call something "absurd", ...
Hamidullah , Oct 27 2009 15:41, Tuesday
By the way, the article is better than perfect! It is so invaluable to read the views of a 'real' expert in Middle East....
Hamidullah , Oct 27 2009 15:32, Tuesday
To Volger: for the first one: Palestine and Turkey has a firm history, they are always connected in some way. It is absu...

Click to read the details of comments
   
Articles of Today
Basic (wrong) instincts
ANDREW FINKEL
Wasted youth
AYŞE KARABAT
Tough days for Obama
AMANDA PAUL
İzmir’s future: urban (re-)development
KLAUS JURGENS
Armenians and our speaking prime minister
İHSAN YILMAZ
How much do we really know?
MICHAEL KUSER
Social and cultural impacts of globalization
DOĞU ERGİL
Impact of Iraqi elections on Kurdish politics
EMRE USLU

Other Articles of the Columnist

  Turkey’s Israel policy consistent with global role
  Climbing down to civilization
  Even if the heavens collapse
  Turkish style of opening borders
  Is the society a dome or a mosaic?
  Hiding behind one finger and Banu Islam
  Is anti-Semitism rising in Turkey?
  Nuclear ambiguity and Israel’s nuclear arsenal
  Eid al-Fitr (Ramazan Bayramı)
  An overlap of holy times and holy places
  The Writers and Journalists Foundation iftar
  Who benefits from the democratic initiative?
  The real solidarity initiative
  Who cares about nomenclature?
  An essential duty without its prerequisites
  Democratic initiative should be democratic
  Semiotic issues and the democratic initiative
  De facto solutions to de jure problems
  The shining crescent
  Öcalan must be confused
Columnists
ABDULHAMİT BİLİCİ
ABDULLAH BOZKURT
ALİ BULAÇ
ALİ H. ASLAN
AMANDA PAUL
ANDREW FINKEL
ASIM ERDİLEK
AYŞE KARABAT
BEJAN MATUR
BERİL DEDEOĞLU
BERK ÇEKTİR
BÜLENT KENEŞ
BÜLENT KORUCU
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
DOĞU ERGİL
EKREM DUMANLI
EMRE USLU
ETYEN MAHÇUPYAN
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK
FİKRET ERTAN
GÜRKAN ZENGİN
HASAN KANBOLAT
HÜSEYİN GÜLERCE
İBRAHİM KALIN
İBRAHİM ÖZTÜRK
İHSAN DAĞI
İHSAN YILMAZ
KATHY HAMILTON
KERİM BALCI
KLAUS JURGENS
LALE KEMAL
MEHMET KAMIŞ
MICHAEL KUSER
MUHAMMED ÇETİN
MÜMTAZER TÜRKÖNE
NICOLE POPE
ÖMER TAŞPINAR
ORHAN KEMAL CENGİZ
PAT YALE
ŞAHİN ALPAY
SELÇUK GÜLTAŞLI
SUAT KINIKLIOĞLU
YAVUZ BAYDAR