About us | Advertising | Contact | Get Home Delivery | Archive
Mar 15, 2010 Homepage
News
Business
Interviews
Columnists
Op-Ed
Arts & Culture
Expat Zone
Features
Travel
Leisure
Life
Cartoons
Women
Health Briefs
Weird But True
Sports
Turkish Press Review
Today's think tanks

Turkey in Foreign Press

istanbul hotels

Columnists
GÜRKAN ZENGİN g.zengin@todayszaman.com Columnists

Initiative can’t return to the beginning


Once again external dynamics are shaping the fate of Turks. After spending its entire history dealing with plots set up because of its location, Turkey is, for the first time, coming face-to-face with opportunities suggested by it geographical location, which sometimes shapes Turkey’s fate by creating crises and at other times by generating vision.

Today's interactive toolbox
Bookmark and Share
Video Photo Audio
Send to print Send to my friend
Post your comments
Read comments
Foreign dynamic factors were behind the declaration of the Tanzimat Fermanı (Administrative Reforms Decree), the entry into NATO and the transition to a multi-party political system. History is hinting at the direction Turkey needs to choose to move ahead from the current crossroads it has reached. Turkey has become a country that has resolved its problems with its neighbors, such as Iran, Iraq and Syria, has lifted heavy burdens that history has placed on its shoulders, such as the Armenian problem, and has launched economic and social integration processes in the region.

Moreover, for the first time ever since the fall of the Berlin Wall and the Twin Towers, Turkey and America, the world’s sole super power, are sharing a united perception on problems in the region. Some Turkish elites are not aware, but history is developing in Turkey’s favor for the first time in many years. From this perspective, solving the Kurdish problem has a dimension that goes beyond just giving us an opportunity for peace. Turkey must solve its Kurdish problem in order to be able to assume the new roles provided by history. External dynamics are forcing and facilitating Turkey’s solution of its Kurdish problem.

It is clear that Turkey will be a vastly different country if it can make the sharp turn that is necessary and solve its Kurdish problem. If Turkey continues ahead by solving this problem, it will begin to assume an order-establishing role in the Middle East-Caucasus-Balkans triangle.

Ending the “ninth Kurdish revolt” means creating peace and transferring resources allocated for counterterrorism -- the figures of which are at incredible levels -- to economic and social development. This situation will increase Turkey’s power in the region.

Some people view the crossroads that Turkey has reached as being on the edge of a cliff and not as a historic opportunity. For them, the continuation of the process means falling of the cliff. Turkey is coming out of the Cold War tunnels that diminish its horizon. It would be a grave oversight to think the light of the sun at the end of the tunnel comes from the headlights of an oncoming train. It is mournful that Turkish political elites fail to see what Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) leader Abdullah Öcalan can see from his secluded cell on İmralı Island.

Turkey has started out on the path that history has assigned, and there is no turning back from it. When Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan expressed his frustration over the outburst from Democratic Society Party (DTP) members in welcoming back the members of the PKK who came down from the mountains, he said everything could go back to the beginning. But it can’t. Turkey burned all its ships, like Tarık Bin Ziyad, the fearless Ummayad military general who led the Muslim conquest of Spain, when it started this process. It is not possible to turn back. Perhaps Erdoğan forgot that Turkey is not the only one in charge of the process.

Managing the process is as important as the process itself. The reflection of the initial excitement in the public shows that the social psychology and media stages of the process were not managed well. The inability to conduct public diplomacy and the negligence of the media aspect has always been a major disability of the Turkish state. Many justified cases were lost or poorly defended because of the neglect of these factors.

The Kurdish initiative faces the same risk. It is evident that the media phase of the initiative was not planned. When the process began, Interior Minister Beşir Atalay met with a countless number of civil society organizations and listened to their opinions and asked for their support. But he barely made any contact with the media. Having a conversation with the Ankara representatives of media organizations doesn’t mean making contact. Is it possible to carry out an initiative without paying due consideration to the images that enter the homes of millions of people every day and night?

Bear in mind that the most critical link to Turkey’s historic transformation is solving the Kurdish problem. Hopefully, these efforts will not become a victim of media malpractice.

24 October 2009, Saturday
GÜRKAN ZENGİN
   
Articles of Today
Can the fate of the judiciary be left to the judiciary?
BÜLENT KENEŞ
When things go wrong
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
Where is Turkey in regard to its ‘Armenian problem'?
ŞAHİN ALPAY
Not a song contest
YAVUZ BAYDAR
Back to reactionary foreign policy?
İHSAN DAĞI
Turkey chooses fiscal rule over IMF role
ASIM ERDİLEK
The absence of opposition in Turkey
ÖMER TAŞPINAR
What about the kids? Turkish citizenship by marriage (2)
BERK ÇEKTİR

Other Articles of the Columnist

  Initiative can’t return to the beginning
  Two ministers, two different ‘European visions’
  Armenian initiative and Davutoğlu effect
  Gül’s messages
  As kids start school
  İstanbul becomes ‘capital of peace’
  Sarkozy’s head, EU’s vision
  MHP’s nationalism
  MHP should lend ear to Halil İnalcık
  Bringing the opposition down from the mountains
  Turkey’s Mesopotamian vision
  Commander
  Harmony at the state level
  Neither with nor without Öcalan
  A call to Nimet Çubukçu
  Turkey won’t accept the Mosul carrot
  Is a Kurdish Obama possible?
  Document and ‘survivability question’
  İlker Başbuğ’s historic mission
  Turkish challenge
Columnists
ABDULHAMİT BİLİCİ
ABDULLAH BOZKURT
ALİ BULAÇ
ALİ H. ASLAN
AMANDA PAUL
ANDREW FINKEL
ASIM ERDİLEK
AYŞE KARABAT
BEJAN MATUR
BERİL DEDEOĞLU
BERK ÇEKTİR
BÜLENT KENEŞ
BÜLENT KORUCU
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
DOĞU ERGİL
EKREM DUMANLI
EMRE USLU
ETYEN MAHÇUPYAN
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK
FİKRET ERTAN
GÜRKAN ZENGİN
HASAN KANBOLAT
HÜSEYİN GÜLERCE
İBRAHİM KALIN
İBRAHİM ÖZTÜRK
İHSAN DAĞI
İHSAN YILMAZ
KATHY HAMILTON
KERİM BALCI
KLAUS JURGENS
LALE KEMAL
MEHMET KAMIŞ
MICHAEL KUSER
MUHAMMED ÇETİN
MÜMTAZER TÜRKÖNE
NICOLE POPE
ÖMER TAŞPINAR
ORHAN KEMAL CENGİZ
PAT YALE
ŞAHİN ALPAY
SELÇUK GÜLTAŞLI
SUAT KINIKLIOĞLU
YAVUZ BAYDAR