|
 |
|
|
Turkey and Armenia agreed on Saturday to establish diplomatic relations after a last-minute spat over planned comments delayed the signing ceremony for three hours and almost thwarted the deal. It has mostly been met with appreciation in Turkey, where the move was termed a “historic” step.
|
|
Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu and his Armenian counterpart, Eduard Nalbandian, signed an agreement in Zurich to reinstate formal ties and reopen a border closed since 1993, within two months of its ratification by both parliaments. According to reports, the last-minute disagreement centered over wording concerning the enclave of Nagorno-Karabakh. Turkey closed the border between the two countries in 1993 to protest Armenia's occupation of that territory, part of Azerbaijan, a key Turkish ally and energy supplier. The planned Armenian statement was to say that the normalization process was not linked to Nagorno-Karabakh, while wording in the Turkish statement concerned an “overall Caucasus peace process.” Although analysts agree that the emergence of a crisis even at the beginning of the process of normalization shows how challenging and tough the process will be for both sides, they are hopeful that the crisis can be overcome to normalize relations. Milliyet's Taha Akyol, who gives some details about the last-minute disagreement before the signing ceremony, explains: “The Armenians demand to see the text of Davutoğlu's speech before the ceremony to see whether there were any problematic parts in it, saying that there is great pressure on them from the Armenian diaspora. Davutoğlu accepts and says he would like to see the text of Nalbandian's speech in return. Both sides find unacceptable parts in each other's speeches. They fail to solve the situation through dialogue and a crisis erupts. What Nalbandian finds problematic in Davutoğlu's text is expressions such as ‘peace and stability in the Caucasus,' because these expressions include Azerbaijan and Nagorno-Karabakh. And Davutoğlu finds the ‘without precondition' expression in Nalbandian's speech.” According to Akyol the reason why this expression was added to Nalbandian's text is because Armenia wants to give the message that the process of normalization is free of the Karabakh problem and Armenian allegations of genocide, hence pleasing the Armenian diaspora. In the meantime, Turkey and Armenia overcame the crisis thanks to the efforts of the Swiss officials, who advised both ministers not to make a speech after the signing ceremony. Akyol says it is very likely for both sides to see the emergence of many more crises during the normalization process, but he says all those crises will be overcome one by one. The fact that the first step toward normalization was taken in such a difficult way shows that the normalization process should not be underestimated and cannot be carried out with an understanding of a fait accompli, says Radikal's Murat Yetkin, who thinks the tension over the first signature will be reflected in the approval process of protocols in the Turkish and Armenian parliaments. According to Yeni Şafak's Fehmi Koru, revitalization of the frozen relations between Turkey and Armenia is not enough because it is necessary to turn the Caucasus into a region where there is peace and stability, and Ankara is pursuing this. Confirming that the goal set is not an easy one for Turkey and that it is impossible to achieve it through unilateral efforts, Koru says the protocols could be prepared and signed before witnesses despite this, so “we can be hopeful,” he adds.
|
| 12 October 2009, Monday |
| FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK |
|
|
|
 |
Comments on this article
|
-
|
BASAR BAYKAN , Oct 13 2009 02:27, Tuesday
|
|
|
Click to read the details of comments
|
|
|
|