About us | Advertising | Contact | Get Home Delivery | Archive
Mar 19, 2010 Homepage
News
Business
Interviews
Columnists
Op-Ed
Arts & Culture
Expat Zone
Features
Travel
Leisure
Life
Cartoons
Women
Health Briefs
Weird But True
Sports
Turkish Press Review
Today's think tanks
Turkey in Foreign Press

Columnists
KERİM BALCI k.balci@todayszaman.com Columnists

Is anti-Semitism rising in Turkey?


Yesterday's Radikal daily ran the results of a European Union-sponsored public survey on xenophobia and racism in its headlines. “Racism within us” read the headline. The results deserved a critical headline indeed, but a close look at the results publicized by the Frekans research company reveals that what is “within us” is ignorance and not racism per se.

Today's interactive toolbox
Bookmark and Share
Video Photo Audio
Send to print Send to my friend
Post your comments
Read comments

As the results of this important nationwide survey appeared only in the Radikal and Milliyet dailies, it is better to present the results as they are represented in these two newspapers. The survey reveals that 42 percent of Turkish people do not want to have a Turkish-Jewish neighbor; over 50 percent of people do not want to see non-Muslims having jobs in public offices, especially if these posts relate to security issues; almost 50 percent of Turkish people believe that the Greek, Armenian and Jewish citizens of Turkey do not feel a belonging to Turkey; and according to an average Turk, an average Jew is unreliable but hardworking and does not value human beings.

These are all the alarm bells of racism in its embryonic stage.

Ignorance is the first step toward racism, but it is not racism. Milliyet columnist Derya Sazak is amazed to see that Turks do not want to have Jewish or Christian neighbors despite the fact that they know very little about Judaism and Christianity. This amazement is amusing. Well, in fact, it is sorrowful. Common wisdom says that human beings are enemies of what they do not know. I am 100 percent sure that a larger portion of Turkish society would say no to a neighbor from an alien species.

The most disturbing result of the Frekans survey is not about our xenophobia, it is about our ignorance of “others within us.” The survey reveals the importance of interfaith and intercultural dialogue activities. It reveals the importance of civil society organizations like the Writers and Journalists Foundation and its Intercultural Dialogue Platform, which has been organizing encounters with the “others within us.”

Shame on the journalists who kept silent on the face of the rootless criticism the volunteers of dialogue had to cope with.

Despite its disturbing findings, the survey is not free of questions itself. The representation of the results in the two newspapers I mentioned lacks any comparison with previous surveys. Only months ago, Professor Yılmaz Esmer publicized the results of his survey, carried out on a larger sample group, about “Radicalism and Extremism,” where Esmer asked the participants about their opinion on the religious or sexual preferences of their neighbors. Sixty-four percent of the Turkish public replied that they wouldn't want to have a Jewish neighbor. If that exclusivist response dropped to 42 percent in only a few months, we can securely conclude that Turkish people's sentiments about Jews are largely dependant on the policies of Israel. Esmer's study was conducted in a period when Israel's Gaza operations created a surge in anti-Zionism all over the world, and not only in Turkey. Professor Esmer's study had comparative notes in it, and we learned from Esmer that in a similar study conducted in 1990, only 45 percent of Turkish people disliked the idea of a Jewish neighbor.

Esmer's findings revealed an increase in anti-Semitism. Frekans' research is actually bringing good tidings. We return to our normal levels of “alien paranoia” when Israel adopts a low-profile military operations policy in the occupied Palestinian lands.

It would be unjust if we reduced the findings of the Frekans survey to the “perception of Jews and Israel in the Turkish public.” The survey says that when asked to define themselves only with one of the identities given, 51 percent chose to say “citizen of the Turkish Republic,” 19 percent Muslim, 19 percent Turkish, 2 percent Kurdish and 2 percent Alevi.

This is something that needs to be discussed more thoroughly.

One last point for the Jewish community! The study was publicized by the Jewish community the day before yesterday. It found a large place in Radikal because Radikal's editor-in-chief, İsmet Berkan, was invited to comment on the findings. Milliyet's Derya Sazak was also among the invitees. To the best of my knowledge, Today's Zaman was not invited or informed. This is doing exactly the opposite of what the survey suggests. If you ignore the largest circulating Turkish daily and the larger of the two English dailies, don't look for any explanation for the ignorance of the general public other than your ignorance of the general tendencies of the public.

01 October 2009, Thursday
KERİM BALCI
Comments on this article

hpg , Oct 01 2009 17:52, Thursday
If you re-read your last paragraph you'll easily understand why you were not invited. hpg
jk , Oct 01 2009 16:21, Thursday
Well, perhaps your paper was not invited for the many articles you & others here have written depicting Israel as a mons...

Click to read the details of comments
   
Articles of Today
All in the family
NICOLE POPE
A new closure case under way?
YAVUZ BAYDAR
Taner Akçam’s letter to the prime minister regarding the Armenian question
ORHAN KEMAL CENGİZ
How many hundreds of thousands of informants are there in Turkey?
HÜSEYİN GÜLERCE
Misled by appearance
ALİ BULAÇ
Saving face
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
The Armenian genocide and disgrace
ETYEN MAHÇUPYAN
Erdoğan’s unwelcome remarks
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK

Other Articles of the Columnist

  Is anti-Semitism rising in Turkey?
  Nuclear ambiguity and Israel’s nuclear arsenal
  Eid al-Fitr (Ramazan Bayramı)
  An overlap of holy times and holy places
  The Writers and Journalists Foundation iftar
  Who benefits from the democratic initiative?
  The real solidarity initiative
  Who cares about nomenclature?
  An essential duty without its prerequisites
  Democratic initiative should be democratic
  Semiotic issues and the democratic initiative
  De facto solutions to de jure problems
  The shining crescent
  Öcalan must be confused
  What did you do today about the Kurdish issue?
  Kurdish issue needs more than democratic reforms
  Boors on the tube
  İstanbul Diplomacy*
  Kurdistan election
  Supreme conspiracy
Columnists
ABDULHAMİT BİLİCİ
ABDULLAH BOZKURT
ALİ BULAÇ
ALİ H. ASLAN
AMANDA PAUL
ANDREW FINKEL
ASIM ERDİLEK
AYŞE KARABAT
BEJAN MATUR
BERİL DEDEOĞLU
BERK ÇEKTİR
BÜLENT KENEŞ
BÜLENT KORUCU
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
DOĞU ERGİL
EKREM DUMANLI
EMRE USLU
ETYEN MAHÇUPYAN
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK
FİKRET ERTAN
GÜRKAN ZENGİN
HASAN KANBOLAT
HÜSEYİN GÜLERCE
İBRAHİM KALIN
İBRAHİM ÖZTÜRK
İHSAN DAĞI
İHSAN YILMAZ
KATHY HAMILTON
KERİM BALCI
KLAUS JURGENS
LALE KEMAL
MEHMET KAMIŞ
MICHAEL KUSER
MUHAMMED ÇETİN
MÜMTAZER TÜRKÖNE
NICOLE POPE
ÖMER TAŞPINAR
ORHAN KEMAL CENGİZ
PAT YALE
ŞAHİN ALPAY
SELÇUK GÜLTAŞLI
SUAT KINIKLIOĞLU
YAVUZ BAYDAR