About us | Advertising | Contact | Get Home Delivery | Archive
Mar 22, 2010 Homepage
News
Business
Interviews
Columnists
Op-Ed
Arts & Culture
Expat Zone
Features
Travel
Leisure
Life
Cartoons
Women
Health Briefs
Weird But True
Sports
Turkish Press Review
Today's think tanks
Turkey in Foreign Press

Columnists
ÖMER TAŞPINAR o.taspinar@todayszaman.com Columnists

What’s next for Iran?


It is clear that the transatlantic community is entering a new and more difficult phase in relations with Iran. The revelation of a secret nuclear facility at a military base near the holy city of Qom is at the heart of this new challenge. The fact that Iran appears to be moving closer and closer to becoming a nuclear power sets the stage for the next chapter of a diplomatic confrontation between the West and the regime in Tehran.

Today's interactive toolbox
Bookmark and Share
Video Photo Audio
Send to print Send to my friend
Post your comments
Read comments
As The New York Times reported, “This is the most important development in the three and a half years since the US has offered negotiations with Iran,” quoting Nicholas Burns, the Bush administration's chief strategist on Iran. Mr. Burns said Washington “now has much greater leverage to organize an international coalition to confront” the country's leaders with sanctions should the negotiating effort fail, the paper reported.

What can the West do? Is there any measure, short of war, to stop Iran from acquiring enriched uranium? There are no easy answers to these questions. But one thing is certain: with the exception of Israel, no country believes in launching a military option against Tehran. The consensus seems to be pointing at the fact that bombing the nuclear facilities will only strengthen the Islamic regime. The timing will also be bad because the regime is experiencing what looks like some serious domestic legitimacy issues. Yet the clock in Iran concerning political change and the clock in the West concerning Iran's nuclear program are running at different speeds. Will the West be patient enough?

The Obama administration appears determined to pursue the path of economic coercion with sanctions before resorting to any military option. Washington is likely to sit at the table with Tehran and ask that all nuclear enrichment sites be opened to international inspectors. The US administration will also tell Tehran that inspectors must have full access to the key personnel who put together the clandestine plant and to the documents surrounding its construction. If Iran fails to show significant cooperation by the end of the year, establishing what officials say is effectively a three-month deadline, there will be much tougher economic sanctions to follow. In other words, Iran will be told that to avoid sanctions, it must adhere to an International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) agreement that would allow inspectors to go virtually anywhere in the country to follow suspicions of nuclear work.

The good news is that on Saturday, Iran's nuclear chief, Ali Akbar Salehi, said the IAEA would be invited to visit the site near Qom. This is the facility that American intelligence agencies believe was designed to house 3,000 centrifuges, enough to produce about one bomb's worth of material a year. The bad news is that Salehi did not say when such a visit will be allowed.

Iranian officials have long maintained that their nuclear program is designed to produce energy, not weapons, and they said the facility near Qom is for peaceful purposes. Washington, on the other hand, finds such Iranian claims hard to believe. In interviews and public comments, the Obama administration's tone has clearly changed in recent days, becoming tougher and more confrontational. Defense Secretary Robert Gates said the recently revealed hidden facility was “part of a pattern of deception and lies on the part of the Iranians from the very beginning with respect to their nuclear program.” “My personal opinion is that the Iranians have the intention of having nuclear weapons,” Mr. Gates concluded, though he said it was still an open question “whether they have made a formal decision” to manufacture weapons.

In the meantime there are also signs that the IAEA will also get tougher with Iran. In May 2008, the Vienna-based agency issued an uncharacteristically blunt demand for more information from Tehran and, even more uncharacteristically, disclosed the existence of 18 secretly obtained documents suggesting Iran's high level of interest in atom bombs.

The implications of all these developments for Turkey are significant. There are clear signs that new economic sanctions against Iran are on the horizon. And this time, Russia may also be on board with the West thanks to a new honeymoon and “reset” in relations with Washington. If there is a transatlantic consensus on Iran that involves Russia, what will Turkey do? Will it side with China at the UN Security Council and risk alienating its NATO and EU partners? In short, a time of reckoning is fast approaching for Ankara.

28 September 2009, Monday
ÖMER TAŞPINAR
   
Articles of Today
The ‘Armenian problem,’ intellectuals and politicians in Turkey
ŞAHİN ALPAY
Process (mis) management
YAVUZ BAYDAR
It’s good to know you’re in good hands
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
Can the AK Party change the Constitution?
İHSAN DAĞI
How to go for growth in Turkey
ASIM ERDİLEK
From zero problems to zero progress
ÖMER TAŞPINAR
Fraudulent activity regarding deeds -- Bodrum and other cities (1)
BERK ÇEKTİR
Reasons behind Erdoğan’s controversial statement
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK

Other Articles of the Columnist

  What’s next for Iran?
  A timely report on Turkey-EU relations
  Turkey and Armenia inch closer
  Where’s the American conspiracy in all this?
  What is at stake in Afghanistan?
  Obama’s difficult summer
  Turkish-Russian pipelines of realpolitik
  Ankara’s Kurdish opening and Washington
  Iran and Iraq: diverging Shiite patterns
  Domestic determinants of Turkish foreign policy (2)
  Domestic determinants of Turkish foreign policy
  De-mystifying political Islam
  Iran’s legitimacy crisis
  Iran’s election: Free and fair?
  Obama’s speech and Pakistan
  Oil: blessing or curse for Iraqi Kurds?
  Turkey’s about-face in the Caucasus
  A grand bargain in the Middle East?
  Ergenekon and the West
  Washington’s Pakistan predicament
Columnists
ABDULHAMİT BİLİCİ
ABDULLAH BOZKURT
ALİ BULAÇ
ALİ H. ASLAN
AMANDA PAUL
ANDREW FINKEL
ASIM ERDİLEK
AYŞE KARABAT
BEJAN MATUR
BERİL DEDEOĞLU
BERK ÇEKTİR
BÜLENT KENEŞ
BÜLENT KORUCU
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
DOĞU ERGİL
EKREM DUMANLI
EMRE USLU
ETYEN MAHÇUPYAN
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK
FİKRET ERTAN
GÜRKAN ZENGİN
HASAN KANBOLAT
HÜSEYİN GÜLERCE
İBRAHİM KALIN
İBRAHİM ÖZTÜRK
İHSAN DAĞI
İHSAN YILMAZ
KATHY HAMILTON
KERİM BALCI
KLAUS JURGENS
LALE KEMAL
MEHMET KAMIŞ
MICHAEL KUSER
MUHAMMED ÇETİN
MÜMTAZER TÜRKÖNE
NICOLE POPE
ÖMER TAŞPINAR
ORHAN KEMAL CENGİZ
PAT YALE
ŞAHİN ALPAY
SELÇUK GÜLTAŞLI
SUAT KINIKLIOĞLU
YAVUZ BAYDAR