About us | Advertising | Contact | Get Home Delivery | Archive
Mar 22, 2010 Homepage
News
Business
Interviews
Columnists
Op-Ed
Arts & Culture
Expat Zone
Features
Travel
Leisure
Life
Cartoons
Women
Health Briefs
Weird But True
Sports
Turkish Press Review
Today's think tanks
Turkey in Foreign Press

Columnists
YAVUZ BAYDAR y.baydar@todayszaman.com Columnists

Pace is of the essence


As the days pass in unmanaged anger, the point of “time is of the essence” is proven. The so-called Kurdish initiative is already showing signs of strain, under increasing numbers of ifs and buts.

Today's interactive toolbox
Bookmark and Share
Video Photo Audio
Send to print Send to my friend
Post your comments
Read comments
Abdullah Öcalan, the jailed leader of the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK), said a couple of weeks ago that Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has to take some steps in three or so months or “he may face being liquidated just like late President Turgut Özal did.”

Experience tells us that there is something in these words to be taken seriously. Time is of the essence, indeed.

The loudly and widely announced “initiative” raised the expectations of the Kurds, both in the provinces in which they live and the urban domain they migrated to. People may hope and believe whatever they hope and believe, but once you “wake up” people's expectations, the crucial part of managing what you declare you will achieve becomes a vital issue of political existence.

The government is struggling already with the simplest of elements. One day it is the Kurdish initiative, the following day it is democratic initiative, then it turns into a “national unity project.”

It is understandable that navigating in the social waters and its sensitivities may be required, but once one chooses to address, too, the very social and ethnic segment whose status is to be reformed, it must be a very clearly defined path with which they will be presented.

It is therefore understandable that Kurds, still hopeful as they are, now start to mumble about their suspicions. Worse, still, their political actors, too, find a pretext to feed these doubts. The baby risks being born dead.

One of the easiest steps to be taken has been about establishing a Kurdology department, and the application by Mardin University was applauded as a fine step. But, in an apparent move of watering down the step, the Higher Education Board (YÖK) declined to have anything to do with the name Kurdish and turned it into a “living languages” department.

As long as allergy, fear and “latent denial” lead to such hesitations, the project -- and process -- is doomed to be hit by half measures.

It is commendable that the Justice and Development Party (AK Party) government seeks consensus with the rivals in opposition. It should be applauded that it is forcing the Republican People's Party (CHP) to start talking business. It should certainly continue to do so.

But the past experience -- of the last, turbulent five years or so -- should also have shown observers that, in reality, it is the AK Party itself that has to go it alone. No matter how willing the CHP becomes, it will remain an utterly unreliable partner -- because of the obviously volatile behavior of its leader -- and it will be up to Erdoğan to lead, with the risks that involves.

The AK Party has now given up on the Nationalist Movement Party (MHP), which will conduct a fierce opposition under the flag of nationalism and with the help of threatening rhetoric. Still, people ask whether the CHP will be, at least, a partner in dialogue.

It may be. Cunningly, Erdoğan is now exerting pressure on the leadership of the CHP to discuss the Kurdish reform proposals that bear the stamp of the CHP, dating back to 1989-90. He says he is ready to absorb some of its elements into the current process because there are many things in common with what the AK Party intends to do.

The letter to Baykal, which Erdoğan mentioned before flying to New York, is to be written and sent to the CHP leader. Baykal, the master of swing, will most probably chew over the correspondence and will try to avoid contact by a dense rhetoric filled with new conditions and demands.

There may be nothing wrong with this waltz. It will serve in favor of the AK Party, but still not damage the CHP severely, since it aims at keeping its “conservative” pro-republican vote. The CHP may only be involved in the “silent support” of insignificant steps -- such as Kurdish translators in hospitals, etc., -- but will maintain its right to oppose major ones.

Erdoğan should also know that the apparently hesitant and fragile support from the top command is the best he can get. (This, too, should show how important the element of time is.) The focus, therefore, must be on what the AK Party knows and does. Sending the wrong messages will increase the damage to the expectant public. If the AK Party renews the motion of cross-border operations into Iraq, it will alienate the Iraqi actors as well as spreading confusion among the Kurds of Turkey. 

23 September 2009, Wednesday
YAVUZ BAYDAR
   
Articles of Today
The ‘Armenian problem,’ intellectuals and politicians in Turkey
ŞAHİN ALPAY
Process (mis) management
YAVUZ BAYDAR
It’s good to know you’re in good hands
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
Can the AK Party change the Constitution?
İHSAN DAĞI
How to go for growth in Turkey
ASIM ERDİLEK
From zero problems to zero progress
ÖMER TAŞPINAR
Fraudulent activity regarding deeds -- Bodrum and other cities (1)
BERK ÇEKTİR
Reasons behind Erdoğan’s controversial statement
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK

Other Articles of the Columnist

  Pace is of the essence
  Full of promises
  A mayor without a sound reason
  Anxiety, dilemma and old habits
  Unbearable lightness of press freedom
  Threat of the vicious circle
  A good neighbor
  Without much delay
  ‘Process management’ needed, or else…
  MHP’s rage: burning bridges or ‘venting’?
  Between a rock and a hard place
  Great divergence
  Gül’s vision, Erdoğan’s courage
  Network unfolding: Ergenekon stage three
  MHP already playing with fire
  The point of no return?
  Battlefield judiciary
  ‘Kurdish process’: with or without Öcalan?
  Greece must be involved actively in Cyprus process
  A final chance on the Kurdish issue?
Columnists
ABDULHAMİT BİLİCİ
ABDULLAH BOZKURT
ALİ BULAÇ
ALİ H. ASLAN
AMANDA PAUL
ANDREW FINKEL
ASIM ERDİLEK
AYŞE KARABAT
BEJAN MATUR
BERİL DEDEOĞLU
BERK ÇEKTİR
BÜLENT KENEŞ
BÜLENT KORUCU
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
DOĞU ERGİL
EKREM DUMANLI
EMRE USLU
ETYEN MAHÇUPYAN
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK
FİKRET ERTAN
GÜRKAN ZENGİN
HASAN KANBOLAT
HÜSEYİN GÜLERCE
İBRAHİM KALIN
İBRAHİM ÖZTÜRK
İHSAN DAĞI
İHSAN YILMAZ
KATHY HAMILTON
KERİM BALCI
KLAUS JURGENS
LALE KEMAL
MEHMET KAMIŞ
MICHAEL KUSER
MUHAMMED ÇETİN
MÜMTAZER TÜRKÖNE
NICOLE POPE
ÖMER TAŞPINAR
ORHAN KEMAL CENGİZ
PAT YALE
ŞAHİN ALPAY
SELÇUK GÜLTAŞLI
SUAT KINIKLIOĞLU
YAVUZ BAYDAR