About us | Advertising | Contact | Get Home Delivery | Archive
Mar 18, 2010 Homepage
News
Business
Interviews
Columnists
Op-Ed
Arts & Culture
Expat Zone
Features
Travel
Leisure
Life
Cartoons
Women
Health Briefs
Weird But True
Sports
Turkish Press Review
Today's think tanks
Turkey in Foreign Press

Columnists
GÜRKAN ZENGİN g.zengin@todayszaman.com Columnists

Sarkozy’s head, EU’s vision


News from Paris reveals that Monsieur Nicolas Sarkozy intends to turn the issue of Turkey's membership in the EU into a “blood feud.” We know that opposition to Turkey gets a lot of public attention on the European political stage.

Today's interactive toolbox
Bookmark and Share
Video Photo Audio
Send to print Send to my friend
Post your comments
Read comments
Besides, no one can claim that Sarkozy's political character is very far removed from populism. It is for this reason that his disregard for the views expressed in a report published last week by the Independent Commission on Turkey, or the “wise men's” report, is not surprising. But one does not need to be a “wise man” to foresee the negative effects this type of mentality will have on Europe in the future.

The Sarkozy and Angela Merkel duo appear to be determined to build a “Paris-Berlin barricade” against Turkey. While The Economist weekly reported on this in its latest edition, it wrote that the Sarkozy/Merkel pair is waiting for the results of the elections to be held in Germany to consolidate the barrier they are setting up against Turkey. If Merkel finds a new partner that is colder toward Turkey, then the one person that may be happier about it then Merkel herself is the French president. As The Economist wrote, this will allow them to “place their cards on the table.” This means that the search for granting a “privileged partnership” or a “special status” to Turkey instead of full membership will gain momentum by the end of the year. More explicitly, they are going to say “Turkey cannot join our club.” Under the influence of this pair, it seems Europe is setting sail toward a colonialist mentality known as “Bonne pour l'orient,” which reeks a little bit of racism and a little bit of religious fanaticism.

Sarkozy's opposition to Turkey's membership should not be surprising. We see France trying to solidify its leadership in the EU over its conciliatory role as a country that can handle complicated issues in the East and overcome crises. It doesn't deny doing this either. However, when we look at its performance since coming to power, it hasn't achieved anything impressive related to these issues. People know how France lost credibility in the eyes of Russians and Georgians after its intervention in the Georgia-Russia war. After intervening in ceasefire talks during Israel's attack on Gaza, France quickly realized that it was way over its head.   

Considering that the French leader is in a hurry to reinforce its leadership position in the EU by pointing to its successful intervention in crises in the Middle East and the Caucasus, there's nothing more natural than for him to not want a country that has realized he won't be able to handle its impact in these areas.

I must note, however, that the ability to make a minimal contribution to crises look like a maximum contribution must be applauded.  

When it comes to Turkey's membership, the real job is left to the other EU members. It would be good if other member countries realized that Sarkozy does not have a “Europe vision” and took a stance accordingly, for Monsieur Sarkozy is playing his own game, but Europe will lose in the end.

The future of a Europe that excludes Turkey is uncertain. At a time when power centers are rapidly shifting from the West to the East, the European continent must see that it needs Turkey in every sense.

Besides, everyone should bear in mind that if a “Berlin-Paris wall” is built against Turkey, then Ankara will have walls to build of it own. Take for example a “Turkish-Russia wall.”  

Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu had said: “Some Europeans have this in their mind. They think Turkish people and the Turkish Republic are not European. But Turkey's geography is a geography that Europeans can use as they wish. Turkish-European relations cannot make progress with this kind of a mentality. It is a big contradiction that some countries that have undersigned projects that create problems for our country in the EU process and that see our people as non-European as well as countries that support these countries have big expectations when it comes to energy projects.”

Take these words spoken by Davutoğlu concerning the energy sector and apply them to all other areas. Hopefully these words will help in the treatment of Europe's “strategic blindness.” Otherwise, the Sarkozy/Merkel mentality, which sees Turkey on Europe's periphery, will eventually turn the European Union into a “periphery” in the “global game.”

12 September 2009, Saturday
GÜRKAN ZENGİN
Comments on this article

.M.G.Ikossi MD,PhD , Sep 12 2009 15:01, Saturday
Possibly you should consider that for the majority of the Europeans who object to the idea of Turkey joining the RU the ...
dimitris kipouros , Sep 12 2009 09:41, Saturday
Dear sir,you say :"Otherwise, the Sarkozy/Merkel mentality, which sees Turkey on Europe's periphery, will eventually tur...
Wolf , Sep 12 2009 08:28, Saturday
Instead of just jointly decide that France and Germany are racists and colonial, why do we not ask ourselves "what can w...

Click to read the details of comments
   
Articles of Today
Turkey and the SIPRI report
LALE KEMAL
Five questions for Mr. Başbuğ
HÜSEYİN GÜLERCE
Constructive ambiguity and destructive obscurity
KERİM BALCI
Will Turkey ever walk alone?
ANDREW FINKEL
Islam, democracy and Turkey
İBRAHİM KALIN
Wanted: democratic opposition in Turkey
MUHAMMED ÇETİN
Spring fever
PAT YALE
A direct intervention in the judiciary
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK

Other Articles of the Columnist

  Sarkozy’s head, EU’s vision
  MHP’s nationalism
  MHP should lend ear to Halil İnalcık
  Bringing the opposition down from the mountains
  Turkey’s Mesopotamian vision
  Commander
  Harmony at the state level
  Neither with nor without Öcalan
  A call to Nimet Çubukçu
  Turkey won’t accept the Mosul carrot
  Is a Kurdish Obama possible?
  Document and ‘survivability question’
  İlker Başbuğ’s historic mission
  Turkish challenge
Columnists
ABDULHAMİT BİLİCİ
ABDULLAH BOZKURT
ALİ BULAÇ
ALİ H. ASLAN
AMANDA PAUL
ANDREW FINKEL
ASIM ERDİLEK
AYŞE KARABAT
BEJAN MATUR
BERİL DEDEOĞLU
BERK ÇEKTİR
BÜLENT KENEŞ
BÜLENT KORUCU
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
DOĞU ERGİL
EKREM DUMANLI
EMRE USLU
ETYEN MAHÇUPYAN
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK
FİKRET ERTAN
GÜRKAN ZENGİN
HASAN KANBOLAT
HÜSEYİN GÜLERCE
İBRAHİM KALIN
İBRAHİM ÖZTÜRK
İHSAN DAĞI
İHSAN YILMAZ
KATHY HAMILTON
KERİM BALCI
KLAUS JURGENS
LALE KEMAL
MEHMET KAMIŞ
MICHAEL KUSER
MUHAMMED ÇETİN
MÜMTAZER TÜRKÖNE
NICOLE POPE
ÖMER TAŞPINAR
ORHAN KEMAL CENGİZ
PAT YALE
ŞAHİN ALPAY
SELÇUK GÜLTAŞLI
SUAT KINIKLIOĞLU
YAVUZ BAYDAR