About us | Advertising | Contact | Get Home Delivery | Archive
Mar 19, 2010 Homepage
News
Business
Interviews
Columnists
Op-Ed
Arts & Culture
Expat Zone
Features
Travel
Leisure
Life
Cartoons
Women
Health Briefs
Weird But True
Sports
Turkish Press Review
Today's think tanks
Turkey in Foreign Press

Columnists
SUAT KINIKLIOĞLU s.kiniklioglu@todayszaman.com Columnists

Now or never in Cyprus


ANKARA -- Cyprus is back on the international agenda, with leaders of the island's rival Greek and Turkish communities engaged in intense negotiations to resolve the divided country's status. But, although new talks are under way, the international community is, not surprisingly, tired of dealing with the issue.

Today's interactive toolbox
Bookmark and Share
Video Photo Audio
Send to print Send to my friend
Post your comments
Read comments

After all, the Cyprus conflict has dragged on since 1974, wearing out United Nations secretary-generals and special representatives of all sorts, as well as bringing down governments in both Greece and Cyprus.

In 2004, the European Union, the United States and a good part of the international community invested considerable energy in trying to resolve the conflict once and for all. Then UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan and his team drafted a plan, which Turkey's government took very significant political risks in supporting. The government convinced the Turkish Cypriots to make a leap of faith and vote in favor of the Annan plan in order to reunite the island.

Regrettably, the Greek Cypriot leadership at that time actively campaigned against the UN plan. Consequently, whereas 65 percent of Turkish Cypriots voted in favor of the plan when it was put to a vote on the island, 76 percent of Greek Cypriots rejected it. Worse yet, Greek Cyprus joined the EU literally days after it spurned the will of the international community, while the EU reneged on its promises to end the Turkish community's isolation if it supported Annan's plan.

Today, many people might think that all of this is water under the bridge. But the fate of the Annan plan remains very much a part of Turkish thinking on the Cyprus issue.

In 2008, the UN started a new negotiation process for Cyprus. Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has given his full blessing to a negotiated settlement and, similar to 2004, Turkey supports the Turkish Cypriots' willingness to find a viable solution to the division of Cyprus under the UN umbrella.

But it should be clear that the current talks are the last chance for a negotiated settlement on the island. So it is imperative that the transatlantic community recognize that the current talks constitute a historic opportunity. No one -- not the US, the EU, Turkey, Greece or the two Cypriot communities -- can afford to waste it. Either the island will reunite under a UN plan accepted by both sides or the status quo will need to change by some other means. The isolation of the Turkish Cypriots, who opted in favor of an internationally acceptable solution, cannot be sustained any longer.

The talks between Turkish Cypriot President Mehmet Ali Talat and Greek Cypriot President Dimitris Christofias are now entering a critical phase. Both leaders need the full support of the transatlantic community.

The US is particularly well situated to contribute to the process in a positive manner, and its engagement at the appropriate level will be needed in the coming months. The US-Turkish partnership, badly strained by the war in Iraq, was reinvigorated by President Barack Obama's visit to Turkey in April. American participation in resolving the Cyprus conflict would ensure that the relationship remains on a sound footing.

Contrary to many previous rounds of Cyprus negotiations, the issue this time is not confined to the island alone but embraces the wider region. The outcome of the ongoing talks, for example, will have a big impact on how Turkey assesses its relations with the EU. Should the talks fail, the side that behaves in an uncompromising manner will bear full responsibility for dividing the island forever.

Moreover, failure to resolve the Cyprus issue would deadlock already strained security cooperation between NATO and the EU. The recent visit to Ankara by the new NATO secretary-general, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, only highlighted again how urgent a Cyprus settlement really is. Failure might also have security implications in the Balkans, the Black Sea and the Eastern Mediterranean -- all areas where the US and the EU have vital interests.

It is for these reasons that the transatlantic community should invest its time and energy in the ongoing UN-sponsored talks. Neither the US nor the EU can afford another failure in Cyprus. There is simply too much at stake.

*Suat Kınıklıoğlu is deputy chairman for external affairs for Turkey's ruling Justice and Development Party (AK Party) and spokesman of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the Turkish Parliament. © Project Syndicate, 2009

11 September 2009, Friday
SUAT KINIKLIOĞLU
Comments on this article

Kibris , Sep 12 2009 01:37, Saturday
The sad truth is there will never be a united cyprus again, its evident the greeks do not want to obide by the rules tha...
Ara Arseven , Sep 11 2009 17:18, Friday
The Cyprus Republic was established in 1960 as a partnership. In 1963, Greek Cypriots forced their Turkish Cypriot part...
Ayse Sener , Sep 11 2009 16:50, Friday
The Cyprus Problem was solved in 1974 when Turkish Cypriots were liberated from Greek oppresssion. No Greek official wa...

Click to read the details of comments
   
Articles of Today
All in the family
NICOLE POPE
A new closure case under way?
YAVUZ BAYDAR
Taner Akçam’s letter to the prime minister regarding the Armenian question
ORHAN KEMAL CENGİZ
How many hundreds of thousands of informants are there in Turkey?
HÜSEYİN GÜLERCE
Misled by appearance
ALİ BULAÇ
Saving face
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
The Armenian genocide and disgrace
ETYEN MAHÇUPYAN
Erdoğan’s unwelcome remarks
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK

Other Articles of the Columnist

  Now or never in Cyprus
  Normalization and changing the status quo
  Paranoia
  Normalization and Peace in the South Caucasus: Is it still possible?
  ‘Meds Yeghern’
  Foreign policy reflections in the aftermath of local Elections
  The Obama visit: risks and opportunities
  Greek police and conservative democracy
  Turkish media and its flaws
  Obama and the Armenian issue
  The US and Turkey in January 2009
  Turkey’s Armenia policy
  Russia, Georgia and Turkey’s fragile EU drive
  Sarkozy’s Turcophobia
  France and Turkey: Friends or foes in Europe?
  Hillary, Obama and McCain: US presidential primaries from a Turkish perspective
  Europe’s French problem: How Paris manages to jeopardize the future of the union
  The rise of a regional hegemon
  Kurdish cats and ticking clocks
  The illusion of Turkish-American partnership
Columnists
ABDULHAMİT BİLİCİ
ABDULLAH BOZKURT
ALİ BULAÇ
ALİ H. ASLAN
AMANDA PAUL
ANDREW FINKEL
ASIM ERDİLEK
AYŞE KARABAT
BEJAN MATUR
BERİL DEDEOĞLU
BERK ÇEKTİR
BÜLENT KENEŞ
BÜLENT KORUCU
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
DOĞU ERGİL
EKREM DUMANLI
EMRE USLU
ETYEN MAHÇUPYAN
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK
FİKRET ERTAN
GÜRKAN ZENGİN
HASAN KANBOLAT
HÜSEYİN GÜLERCE
İBRAHİM KALIN
İBRAHİM ÖZTÜRK
İHSAN DAĞI
İHSAN YILMAZ
KATHY HAMILTON
KERİM BALCI
KLAUS JURGENS
LALE KEMAL
MEHMET KAMIŞ
MICHAEL KUSER
MUHAMMED ÇETİN
MÜMTAZER TÜRKÖNE
NICOLE POPE
ÖMER TAŞPINAR
ORHAN KEMAL CENGİZ
PAT YALE
ŞAHİN ALPAY
SELÇUK GÜLTAŞLI
SUAT KINIKLIOĞLU
YAVUZ BAYDAR