About us | Advertising | Contact | Get Home Delivery | Archive
Mar 20, 2010 Homepage
News
Business
Interviews
Columnists
Op-Ed
Arts & Culture
Expat Zone
Features
Travel
Leisure
Life
Cartoons
Women
Health Briefs
Weird But True
Sports
Turkish Press Review
Today's think tanks
Turkey in Foreign Press

Columnists
İBRAHİM KALIN i.kalin@todayszaman.com Columnists

Does Islam need enlightenment?


Let's face it: The traditional Islamic ontology that shaped the worldview of Muslims is alien to the modern world. The Muslim notion of placing everything within a framework of transcendence has little appeal in an aggressively secular world. Muslims are torn between a glorious past, a miserable present and an uncertain future.

Today's interactive toolbox
Bookmark and Share
Video Photo Audio
Send to print Send to my friend
Post your comments
Read comments
Many ask how and why the Muslim world, which produced one of the most advanced civilizations in human history, has become so desolate, backward, uncreative and chaotic today. How can the Muslim world get out of this state of affairs and recover its past glory? Can it create another world civilization while maintaining its core values and by bracketing Western modernity? Is Islam the last foe of the project of the Enlightenment? Does Islam need enlightenment?

These are critical questions for the Muslim world and the world at large. But the calls for an “Islamic enlightenment” usually betray a Euro-centric bent and assume that the intellectual framework of the Enlightenment can be reproduced in other cultural contexts to create more rational, pluralistic and tolerant societies. The experience of the 18th-century European Enlightenment is deemed to be applicable to other cultures and societies. This essentially makes the 18th-century Enlightenment an ahistoric experience. This assumption goes against the critical spirit of the Enlightenment.

But there are other reasons that make the idea of an Islamic enlightenment questionable. The first is that the main thrust of the Enlightenment project has become largely defunct, obsolete and dysfunctional in the late modernity in which we live. The ideas of ideological rationalism, Promethean individual, autonomous reason, scientism, positivism, anthropomorphism and Eurocentrism have been mostly abandoned in favor of a more humane and humble concept of reality. Today, no one is so naïve as to believe in pure reason, absolute objectivity or equality with tacit racism. True, the critical spirit of the Enlightenment can certainly serve as an educational tool to prevent the ossification of tradition. But no society can live on criticism alone; one has to build a terra firma as well to dwell in a safe moral and philosophical space.

Secondly, if there is any sense of talking to the Muslim faith to induce it to develop a more tolerant and inclusive worldview, it will happen only by recovering these values from within the Islamic tradition, not from outside. Attempts at injecting overtly Western-capitalist cultural values under the guise of universal principles have failed and mostly backfired. Muslim societies have rejected not the universal values that they share with other cultures but what has been imposed upon them as the value system and political economy of global capitalism.

The Muslim world needs to recover its own intellectual tradition and moral compass to face up to the challenges of the modern world. The core values of the Enlightenment are too secular, convoluted and Eurocentric to provide a context of meaning and analysis for Muslim societies in the 21st century. It is a common mistake to think that the realities of the modern world require everyone to surrender to the moral demands of modernity. The phenomena of late modernity show that traditional ways are still relevant and continue to survive in the most hyper and post-modern realms of the modern world. In some cases, maintaining the tradition makes more sense in the face of numerous contemporary challenges.

The Muslim world needs an enlightenment of its own, but only if it comes, in the words of the great Muslim sage Suhrawardi (d. 1191), as an ishraq, i.e., “illumination,” not as the “Afklarung” of 18th-century Europe. There is a world of difference between “enlightenment,” produced by a self-worshipping reason, and “illumination,” which reveals the larger reality of which we are only a part. In contrast to enlightenment, illumination does not reject tradition and does not reduce reality to my (limited) understanding of it. It is this epistemic humility rather than rationalistic hubris that should guide our search for truth and justice.

27 August 2009, Thursday
İBRAHİM KALIN
Comments on this article

Dyz , Aug 28 2009 13:59, Friday
"This essentially makes the 18th-century Enlightenment an ahistoric experience. This assumption goes against the critica...
dara , Aug 28 2009 01:18, Friday
Dear Mr Kalin, with respect, I do not wish to hurt anybodies feeling I just share my view. Guide our search for truth ...
K.Gangopadhyay , Aug 27 2009 21:22, Thursday
I want to know why all terrorist all over the world-Thailand, Phillipine, India, Bangladesh, Nigeria,KenyaEtc. are Musli...

Click to read the details of comments
   
Articles of Today
The ‘genocide’ problem: states, parliaments and people
BERİL DEDEOĞLU
Greek Cypriots blocking Turkey’s judicial reform
ABDULHAMİT BİLİCİ
Opportunity for judicial reform
MÜMTAZER TÜRKÖNE
Who is who?
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
Either the state or a raven’s carcass
MEHMET KAMIŞ
Let it play out for everyone’s sake
ABDULLAH BOZKURT
‘Model partner’ or ‘genocide offender’?
GÜRKAN ZENGİN
Can (Turkish) soccer hooliganism be stopped?
KLAUS JURGENS
A small package but a big step for democracy
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK

Other Articles of the Columnist

  Does Islam need enlightenment?
  Islam and the Enlightenment
  Strategic depth at work
  ‘The Turkish problem’ or is a win-win situation possible?
  The Turkish role and the aspirations of a rising global power
  What has changed in the Kurdish issue?
  Did Erdoğan call it genocide?
  Obama in Russia: What is in it for Turkey?
  Michael Jackson, Islam and globalization
  Back to Europe?
  Talking about religion and science in İstanbul
  They are coming: a note on the fate of pluralism in Europe
  Obama’s message in Egypt
  What is the ‘historic opportunity’?
  The Cabinet reshuffle and Erdoğan’s next move
  Europe, Islam and Turkey
  Style and substance in Turkish foreign policy
  Turkish military and the Kurdish question
  Obama and Turkey
  The ‘message’ of the elections
Columnists
ABDULHAMİT BİLİCİ
ABDULLAH BOZKURT
ALİ BULAÇ
ALİ H. ASLAN
AMANDA PAUL
ANDREW FINKEL
ASIM ERDİLEK
AYŞE KARABAT
BEJAN MATUR
BERİL DEDEOĞLU
BERK ÇEKTİR
BÜLENT KENEŞ
BÜLENT KORUCU
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
DOĞU ERGİL
EKREM DUMANLI
EMRE USLU
ETYEN MAHÇUPYAN
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK
FİKRET ERTAN
GÜRKAN ZENGİN
HASAN KANBOLAT
HÜSEYİN GÜLERCE
İBRAHİM KALIN
İBRAHİM ÖZTÜRK
İHSAN DAĞI
İHSAN YILMAZ
KATHY HAMILTON
KERİM BALCI
KLAUS JURGENS
LALE KEMAL
MEHMET KAMIŞ
MICHAEL KUSER
MUHAMMED ÇETİN
MÜMTAZER TÜRKÖNE
NICOLE POPE
ÖMER TAŞPINAR
ORHAN KEMAL CENGİZ
PAT YALE
ŞAHİN ALPAY
SELÇUK GÜLTAŞLI
SUAT KINIKLIOĞLU
YAVUZ BAYDAR