About us | Advertising | Contact | Get Home Delivery | Archive
Mar 18, 2010 Homepage
News
Business
Interviews
Columnists
Op-Ed
Arts & Culture
Expat Zone
Features
Travel
Leisure
Life
Cartoons
Women
Health Briefs
Weird But True
Sports
Turkish Press Review
Today's think tanks
Turkey in Foreign Press

Columnists
ÖMER TAŞPINAR o.taspinar@todayszaman.com Columnists

Turkish-Russian pipelines of realpolitik


Turkey's growing partnership with Russia has been a source of concern for Washington for the last few years. Although Turkish-Russian relations appear to be fueled mainly by oil and gas, American officials often wonder whether there are more strategic political dimensions in this emerging partnership.

Today's interactive toolbox
Bookmark and Share
Video Photo Audio
Send to print Send to my friend
Post your comments
Read comments
This is why Vladimir Putin's visit to Ankara was carefully followed and analyzed in Washington. The conclusion reached by many is that Turkish-Russian relations are based on the firm grounds of pipeline realpolitik. The two countries are purely and simply following their very own national economic and strategic interests. Ankara's intentions are clear: It wants to keep its options open in terms of becoming an energy hub. Surrounded by Iraq, Iran, the Caspian states and Russia, Turkey is uniquely well placed to control the flow of gas into Europe. In other words, it would take much more than vague hopes of European Union membership to convince Ankara not to sign major energy agreements with Moscow.

Simply put, Turkey is in no mood to see Russia as a potentially aggressive expansionist power. This, however, is exactly how most American analyst have seen Moscow since last year's confrontation in Georgia. The consensus in Washington is that Russia has now become a mafia state willing to assert a sphere of influence in the former Soviet territories with its main weapon: gas. There were high hopes at the end of the Cold War that a new relationship would emerge with Moscow. That optimism is now gone. A few commentators, such as Tom Freidman, from The New York Times, still blame Washington for rapidly expanding NATO in the 1990s. But the majority of the American power establishment has moved on. The big debate now is whether Ukraine and Georgia should be included in the club.

Another dimension of this need to once again “contain” Russia is of course about energy and pipelines and this is where Turkey enters the picture. Washington has long been a strong supporter of alternative pipelines bringing Caspian and Central Asian energy resources to Western markets without going through Russian territory. The classic example is the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (TBC) pipeline linking Azerbaijani oil with Europe through Georgia and Turkey. Last month, another major project to sideline Russia gained the green light for construction when the EU and Turkey signed the Nabucco project, the 3,300-kilometer-long gas pipeline from Central Asia to Europe.

But Putin's visit to Turkey made a mockery of Nabucco's very own raison d'être. Under the deal signed on Thursday, Turkey granted the Russian natural gas giant Gazprom the right to use its territorial waters in the Black Sea, under which the company wants to route a second South Stream pipeline to gas markets in Eastern and Southern Europe. Needless to say, this Russian pipeline, called the South Stream, will directly compete with Nabucco. The project needs Ankara's consent because the planned route passes through Turkish territorial waters.

It was not clear that Turkey would agree to the project since South Stream bypassed Turkish territories. Turkey has been a regular customer of Russian gas through the Blue Stream pipeline and was believed to fear that some of that gas would instead be diverted to the EU with the South Stream. This is why Ankara needed to be convinced by Putin.

To buy Ankara's support, Russia agreed to pay a high price. Russia will now help finance important projects for Turkey, including an oil pipeline from Samsun to Ceyhan and one or more nuclear power stations. Steps toward relying less on natural gas and oil by launching its own nuclear stations has been a Turkish strategic objective since 2003. In that sense, the deal with Russia is a long-cherished dream for Turkish politicians.

Russia, for its part, now achieves its long-cherished goal of selling gas to Europe without doing so to Ukraine. This way Russia can assert itself in its near abroad without paying a high price in terms of economic relations with Europe. As the Financial Times clearly put it, “the principal motive for South Stream is Russia's ambition to bypass Ukraine, which is the transit country for 80 percent of Russia's gas exports to the EU. As became obvious in January, in the latest flare-up of its long-running dispute with Ukraine over gas prices, Russia has no way to cut off the gas to Ukraine without also cutting off most of its European customers.” In that sense, South Stream and its sister pipeline Nord Stream, intended to run under the Baltic, will manage to fully isolate Ukraine, the crown jewel in Russia's sphere of influence.

10 August 2009, Monday
ÖMER TAŞPINAR
   
Articles of Today
Turkey and the SIPRI report
LALE KEMAL
Five questions for Mr. Başbuğ
HÜSEYİN GÜLERCE
Constructive ambiguity and destructive obscurity
KERİM BALCI
Will Turkey ever walk alone?
ANDREW FINKEL
Islam, democracy and Turkey
İBRAHİM KALIN
Wanted: democratic opposition in Turkey
MUHAMMED ÇETİN
Spring fever
PAT YALE
A direct intervention in the judiciary
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK

Other Articles of the Columnist

  Turkish-Russian pipelines of realpolitik
  Ankara’s Kurdish opening and Washington
  Iran and Iraq: diverging Shiite patterns
  Domestic determinants of Turkish foreign policy (2)
  Domestic determinants of Turkish foreign policy
  De-mystifying political Islam
  Iran’s legitimacy crisis
  Iran’s election: Free and fair?
  Obama’s speech and Pakistan
  Oil: blessing or curse for Iraqi Kurds?
  Turkey’s about-face in the Caucasus
  A grand bargain in the Middle East?
  Ergenekon and the West
  Washington’s Pakistan predicament
  Dodging a bullet with Washington
  Obama’s diminishing expectations of the world
  NATO, Afghanistan and Turkey’s role
  Obama in Turkey, Turkey in Europe
  For the European Union, despite the European Union
  Smart public diplomacy
Columnists
ABDULHAMİT BİLİCİ
ABDULLAH BOZKURT
ALİ BULAÇ
ALİ H. ASLAN
AMANDA PAUL
ANDREW FINKEL
ASIM ERDİLEK
AYŞE KARABAT
BEJAN MATUR
BERİL DEDEOĞLU
BERK ÇEKTİR
BÜLENT KENEŞ
BÜLENT KORUCU
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
DOĞU ERGİL
EKREM DUMANLI
EMRE USLU
ETYEN MAHÇUPYAN
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK
FİKRET ERTAN
GÜRKAN ZENGİN
HASAN KANBOLAT
HÜSEYİN GÜLERCE
İBRAHİM KALIN
İBRAHİM ÖZTÜRK
İHSAN DAĞI
İHSAN YILMAZ
KATHY HAMILTON
KERİM BALCI
KLAUS JURGENS
LALE KEMAL
MEHMET KAMIŞ
MICHAEL KUSER
MUHAMMED ÇETİN
MÜMTAZER TÜRKÖNE
NICOLE POPE
ÖMER TAŞPINAR
ORHAN KEMAL CENGİZ
PAT YALE
ŞAHİN ALPAY
SELÇUK GÜLTAŞLI
SUAT KINIKLIOĞLU
YAVUZ BAYDAR