About us | Advertising | Contact | Get Home Delivery | Archive
Mar 22, 2010 Homepage
News
Business
Interviews
Columnists
Op-Ed
Arts & Culture
Expat Zone
Features
Travel
Leisure
Life
Cartoons
Women
Health Briefs
Weird But True
Sports
Turkish Press Review
Today's think tanks
Turkey in Foreign Press

Columnists
ŞAHİN ALPAY s.alpay@todayszaman.com Columnists

How does the Muslim world view Turkey-EU relations?


What are the perceptions of the European Union in the Muslim world? How does the Muslim world view Turkey and its relationship with the EU? Have perceptions and views been changing recently?

Today's interactive toolbox
Bookmark and Share
Video Photo Audio
Send to print Send to my friend
Post your comments
Read comments
I suppose it is not necessary to emphasize the importance of these questions to understanding the Muslim world, Turkey and relations between the West and the Muslim world, especially in the aftermath of Sept. 11.

 Last month the Open Society Foundation of Turkey published a study providing responses to the questions posed above. This most pertinent study deals with widespread perceptions in the Muslim world regarding Turkey and the Turkey-EU relationship, as well as the changes that have taken place following the coming to power of the post-Islamist Justice and Development Party (AKP) in 2002. The study, titled “Reflections of Turkey-EU Relations in the Muslim World,” has two parts. The first, co-authored by Yousef al-Sharif of Al Jazeera-Turkey and Samir Salha of Kocaeli University, reviews how the Turkey-EU relationship has been covered in the Arab media. The second, written by Rasul Bakhsh Rais of Lahore University, analyzes the debates on that topic among the Muslims of Pakistan and India. It is possible to summarize the conclusions as follows:

 During the 1980s, Turkey was perceived, especially among the Arabs, as a society which had turned its back on Islam and a state that had become a lackey of the West and an ally of Israel, which occupies and oppresses the Palestinian people. The efforts of Turkey to join the EU, regarded as nothing other than a “Christian club,” were seen as an odd endeavor that would never be achieved. One could not come across even a single positive comment in the Arab media on Turkey's EU bid, which was largely reproached and ridiculed.

 Beginning with the declaration of Turkey as a candidate for membership at the EU's 1999 Helsinki Summit and especially after the Brussels Summit, where the European Council decided to open accession talks with Ankara, perceptions in the Arab world regarding Turkey, the EU and the Turkey-EU relationship started to change. The AKP government, which initiated substantial political and economic reforms to fulfill the Copenhagen political criteria of the EU, began to be seen as an example which demonstrated that Islam, modernity and democracy are indeed compatible. The AKP was regarded as a party similar to the Christian Democratic parties of Western Europe. Ankara's refusal in 2003 to allow the deployment on Turkish soil of US troops to invade Iraq was taken as a sign showing that Turkey was not a lackey of the West, but a country that pursued its national interests.

 The radically altered image of the country which increased interest in and respect for Turkey among the Arabs peaked when Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan protested the Israeli invasion of Gaza at the Davos conference in January 2009. The number of Arab visitors to Turkey multiplied, and “despite fatwas issued by religious leaders who frowned on the Western-style culture and values that these series inculcated,” Arab TV channels started buying, dubbing and broadcasting Turkish drama series of high demand among viewers.

 The increasing interest of the Muslim world in the Turkey-EU relationship led to more than 200 reporters from Muslim countries covering the EU's Brussels Summit on Dec. 17, 2004, where the decision to open accession talks with Turkey was on the agenda. That decision also changed the image of the EU among Arabs. The EU began to be viewed not as a “Christian club,” but as a union of democracies, whatever their religion and culture. The EU would live up to its ideal of “unity in diversity” with Turkey joining the union. Turkish membership of the EU would help overcome the growing tensions between Islam and the West in the aftermath of Sept. 11, building a bridge between the two worlds. Arab liberals expected Turkish membership in the EU to boost democratization in neighboring Muslim countries.

 Opposition to Turkish membership in the EU by French President Nicolas Sarkozy and German Chancellor Angela Merkel, despite commitments to Turkey by the EU, was heavily criticized in the Arab media. It was assessed as a sign of discrimination against Muslims by Europeans. The view that the exclusion of Turkey from the union would breed radicalism among Muslims was often expressed.

 The day I concluded reading the study summarized above, Aug. 6, The Guardian published an article by Tariq Ramadan titled “Turkey is part of Europe. Fear keeps it out of the EU.” Ramadan was saying mainly the following: “It is time for the countries of Europe to overcome their fear of Islam; time for them to stop turning Turkish EU membership into a cultural battleground. … We need courageous European politicians who will develop a new vision of Turkish-EU relations, who will remind their citizens that Turkey, by virtue of its economic power, geography, history and natural position as go-between with the ‘Muslim world,' is a major asset for Europe and for its future.” Ramadan, surely, reflects how the Muslims of Europe view the Turkey-EU relationship.

10 August 2009, Monday
ŞAHİN ALPAY
Comments on this article

zeynep , Aug 10 2009 17:38, Monday
thank you for this very useful article. it virtually broadened my mind. as a person who is about to attend a master prog...
Jen L. Jones , Aug 10 2009 16:32, Monday
If Tariq Ramadan wants Europeans to "overcome their fear of Islam" he would be well advised to go to the source and advi...

Click to read the details of comments
   
Articles of Today
The ‘Armenian problem,’ intellectuals and politicians in Turkey
ŞAHİN ALPAY
Process (mis) management
YAVUZ BAYDAR
It’s good to know you’re in good hands
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
Can the AK Party change the Constitution?
İHSAN DAĞI
How to go for growth in Turkey
ASIM ERDİLEK
From zero problems to zero progress
ÖMER TAŞPINAR
Fraudulent activity regarding deeds -- Bodrum and other cities (1)
BERK ÇEKTİR
Reasons behind Erdoğan’s controversial statement
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK

Other Articles of the Columnist

  How does the Muslim world view Turkey-EU relations?
  Turkey is preparing for peace at home
  The future of the political role of the military in Turkey
  What keeps the ‘Sèvres Syndrome’ alive and kicking?
  Why did Ankara congratulate Ahmadinejad?
  Democratic control of the military is imperative
  The Turkish Armed Forces’ dignity is at stake
  Why the great distrust in the US and the EU?
  What sort of politician is Prime Minister Erdoğan?
  Turkey can no longer be taken for granted
  Why does the EU matter for Turkey?
  Opportunity for peace at home must not be missed
  Why is Turkish secularism so problematic?
  Commendable move by Ankara and Yerevan
  A redefinition of the military’s political role?
  Obama’s support for democracy in Turkey most welcome
  A big win for democracy in Turkey
  Rasmussen for NATO: a very bad idea
  Justice and Development Party: sins and good deeds
  Our recovering alliance with the US
Columnists
ABDULHAMİT BİLİCİ
ABDULLAH BOZKURT
ALİ BULAÇ
ALİ H. ASLAN
AMANDA PAUL
ANDREW FINKEL
ASIM ERDİLEK
AYŞE KARABAT
BEJAN MATUR
BERİL DEDEOĞLU
BERK ÇEKTİR
BÜLENT KENEŞ
BÜLENT KORUCU
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
DOĞU ERGİL
EKREM DUMANLI
EMRE USLU
ETYEN MAHÇUPYAN
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK
FİKRET ERTAN
GÜRKAN ZENGİN
HASAN KANBOLAT
HÜSEYİN GÜLERCE
İBRAHİM KALIN
İBRAHİM ÖZTÜRK
İHSAN DAĞI
İHSAN YILMAZ
KATHY HAMILTON
KERİM BALCI
KLAUS JURGENS
LALE KEMAL
MEHMET KAMIŞ
MICHAEL KUSER
MUHAMMED ÇETİN
MÜMTAZER TÜRKÖNE
NICOLE POPE
ÖMER TAŞPINAR
ORHAN KEMAL CENGİZ
PAT YALE
ŞAHİN ALPAY
SELÇUK GÜLTAŞLI
SUAT KINIKLIOĞLU
YAVUZ BAYDAR