About us | Advertising | Contact | Get Home Delivery | Archive
Mar 21, 2010 Homepage
News
Business
Interviews
Columnists
Op-Ed
Arts & Culture
Expat Zone
Features
Travel
Leisure
Life
Cartoons
Women
Health Briefs
Weird But True
Sports
Turkish Press Review
Today's think tanks
Turkey in Foreign Press

Columnists
İBRAHİM KALIN i.kalin@todayszaman.com Columnists

‘The Turkish problem’ or is a win-win situation possible?


We Turks have a unique talent: while trying to solve one problem, we produce another one. When we fail to create a win-win situation for all stakeholders, we end up making things worse.

Today's interactive toolbox
Bookmark and Share
Video Photo Audio
Send to print Send to my friend
Post your comments
Read comments
This is where we are with the Kurdish issue. There is a new renewed optimism about the Kurdish issue. Even most pessimists seem to have a brighter view of things this time. The radicals on all sides are following the developments closely and waiting for more to happen. But the key question remains: will a lasting solution to the Kurdish issue be a win-win situation for everyone?

 Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan started a new initiative and instructed Interior Minister Beşir Atalay to prepare an action plan to find a lasting solution to the Kurdish problem. In his address to his party group, he even said, “This [Justice and Development Party (AK Party)] group will see this problem solved,” referring to the numerous failed attempts since Turgut Özal's efforts in the late 1980s.

 The goal is to bring the outlawed Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) fighters down from the mountains, bring an end to violence, disarm the PKK and expand the field of democratic rights for all citizens of Turkey, including the Kurds. This entails removing the main obstacles to the use of the Kurdish language and taking bold steps in other areas of democratization. The government is also planning to boost the economic development of the region by finishing the multi-billion dollar Southeastern Anatolia Project (GAP), which will provide new jobs for the young generation in the Kurdish-populated areas. Last year, the government allocated $12 billion to GAP.

 Will all of this be enough to create a win-win situation for all citizens of Turkey? We do not know yet if the Kurdish political leaders will be satisfied with the new package. They may ask for more and get less. The reason is that while trying to solve the Kurdish issue, Turkey may end up with a “Turkish problem.”

 What is the Turkish problem? It is the rise of a new nationalism against the Kurdish initiative. This new nationalism does not have to have any of the colors of classical nationalism, no trace of Turkism, no shade of even political nationalism. Rather, it may have all the elements of an oppositional identity: the new Turkish identity versus the Kurds.

 The initial reaction of Devlet Bahçeli, the leader of the Turkist Nationalist Movement Party (MHP), to the new Kurdish initiative already gives some signals. Bahçeli not only rejected the initiative but also threatened to take the fight back to the mountains themselves. He is implying that if the AK Party government and the Turkish military do not fight against the PKK, his party will do so, even if it means “going up to the mountains for 50 years.” His party officials later tried to “clarify” his statement, but the message is clear.

This threat is not to be taken lightly. Bahçeli's statement can easily become the voice of many in Turkey and a new anti-Kurdish Turkish identity may easily spread across the various social and political segments of Turkish society. We may end up with a deadlier Turkish problem while struggling with the Kurdish problem.

 What can the AK Party government do? There is a lot the Erdoğan government can do, and it is already doing it. The action plan for a new democratization package is yet to be announced, but the government seems to be determined.

 President Abdullah Gül and Prime Minister Erdoğan are among the most respected national leaders in Turkey. In many polls, Erdoğan emerges as the most “nationalist leader,” i.e., the most patriotic leader. Both Gül and Erdoğan have these credentials and will have to use their own personal cache to convince everyone of a win-win situation.

 Much of Turkish nationalism is based on sentimentality; it is not a rational political philosophy but a powerful feeling of community, history and tradition. Both leaders will have to use Ottoman history as a model to soften the sharp edges of anti-Kurdish, anti-Arab and anti-Persian Turkish nationalism. If successful, this process will deeply transform Turkish nationalism and bring it back closer to its Ottoman roots.

It looks like an Ottoman model of national diversity will be the only model to create a win-win situation for everyone.

06 August 2009, Thursday
İBRAHİM KALIN
Comments on this article

ayhan , Aug 06 2009 18:56, Thursday
ı'm agree wiht the author. it is vital to include all segments of society. to put on the agenda the martyries and deaths...

Click to read the details of comments
   
Articles of Today
Basic (wrong) instincts
ANDREW FINKEL
Wasted youth
AYŞE KARABAT
Tough days for Obama
AMANDA PAUL
İzmir’s future: urban (re-)development
KLAUS JURGENS
Armenians and our speaking prime minister
İHSAN YILMAZ
How much do we really know?
MICHAEL KUSER
Social and cultural impacts of globalization
DOĞU ERGİL
Impact of Iraqi elections on Kurdish politics
EMRE USLU

Other Articles of the Columnist

  ‘The Turkish problem’ or is a win-win situation possible?
  The Turkish role and the aspirations of a rising global power
  What has changed in the Kurdish issue?
  Did Erdoğan call it genocide?
  Obama in Russia: What is in it for Turkey?
  Michael Jackson, Islam and globalization
  Back to Europe?
  Talking about religion and science in İstanbul
  They are coming: a note on the fate of pluralism in Europe
  Obama’s message in Egypt
  What is the ‘historic opportunity’?
  The Cabinet reshuffle and Erdoğan’s next move
  Europe, Islam and Turkey
  Style and substance in Turkish foreign policy
  Turkish military and the Kurdish question
  Obama and Turkey
  The ‘message’ of the elections
  The Turkish military, democracy and a top general
  How to engage political Islam (III)
  How to engage political Islam (II)
Columnists
ABDULHAMİT BİLİCİ
ABDULLAH BOZKURT
ALİ BULAÇ
ALİ H. ASLAN
AMANDA PAUL
ANDREW FINKEL
ASIM ERDİLEK
AYŞE KARABAT
BEJAN MATUR
BERİL DEDEOĞLU
BERK ÇEKTİR
BÜLENT KENEŞ
BÜLENT KORUCU
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
DOĞU ERGİL
EKREM DUMANLI
EMRE USLU
ETYEN MAHÇUPYAN
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK
FİKRET ERTAN
GÜRKAN ZENGİN
HASAN KANBOLAT
HÜSEYİN GÜLERCE
İBRAHİM KALIN
İBRAHİM ÖZTÜRK
İHSAN DAĞI
İHSAN YILMAZ
KATHY HAMILTON
KERİM BALCI
KLAUS JURGENS
LALE KEMAL
MEHMET KAMIŞ
MICHAEL KUSER
MUHAMMED ÇETİN
MÜMTAZER TÜRKÖNE
NICOLE POPE
ÖMER TAŞPINAR
ORHAN KEMAL CENGİZ
PAT YALE
ŞAHİN ALPAY
SELÇUK GÜLTAŞLI
SUAT KINIKLIOĞLU
YAVUZ BAYDAR