About us | Advertising | Contact | Get Home Delivery | Archive
Mar 22, 2010 Homepage
News
Business
Interviews
Columnists
Op-Ed
Arts & Culture
Expat Zone
Features
Travel
Leisure
Life
Cartoons
Women
Health Briefs
Weird But True
Sports
Turkish Press Review
Today's think tanks
Turkey in Foreign Press

Columnists
ÖMER TAŞPINAR o.taspinar@todayszaman.com Columnists

Ankara’s Kurdish opening and Washington


Turkey is once again showing at least some rhetorical willingness to find a peaceful solution to its deeply rooted Kurdish problem.

Today's interactive toolbox
Bookmark and Share
Video Photo Audio
Send to print Send to my friend
Post your comments
Read comments
This is certainly good news for Washington. The reason is simple. The Kurdish problem has been the most important issue poisoning Turkish-US relations and the persistently negative image of the US in Turkey. Despite the claims of some Turkish pundits in Washington that Turkish anti-Americanism is fueled by the rise of Islam and conservatism, US officials familiar with Turkey know that the real reason fueling a negative perception of Washington is the strongly held belief that the United States wants an independent Kurdish state in Iraq and thus foments Kurdish nationalism in the region.

 Sixty percent of Turks, according to recent opinion polls, believe that Washington and Europe are enemies of Turkey and that they are helping the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK). As I said, this is the perception and not the reality. But in international relations, as well as in human and social psychology, “perception is reality.”

This is why any attempt of the Turkish government to recognize that there is a Kurdish problem with domestic roots in Turkey and that a solution to the root causes of the Kurdish problem requires more democratization, as Minister of Interior Beşir Atalay emphasized last week, is good news for the United States. This is good news for Washington for an additional reason having to do with Turkey's regional ambition to play a high-profile mediation role in the Middle East and beyond. US officials are very familiar with the vision and narrative of the Justice and Development Party's (AKP) foreign policy, now under the direction of Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu. This vision puts Turkey at the center of major regional issues and promotes the geostrategic and political importance of Turkey as the only country that can talk to conflicting parts with a regional voice and historic experience. As a result, the Turkish government believes it is playing a very effective role in mediating between Israel and Syria, Afghanistan and Pakistan, Hamas and Fatah, Sunni Iraqis and Shiite Iraqis, Russia and Georgia, etc.

Washington is certainly appreciative of this Turkish vision and effort. It is also willing to support it when necessary. However, there is also a sense among US officials that this regional vision and ambition of Turkey takes away time and intellectual energy from Turkey's own foreign and domestic problems. In other words, there is a certain belief in Washington that Turkey should focus a bit more on solving its own major problems instead of spending so much time and energy on other countries' issues. The list of domestic issues Turkey could focus on is long. It starts with the Kurdish question, but it certainly does not end there. The normalization of relations with Armenia, the Cyprus question, more EU reforms and the democratization of civilian-military relations are additional areas where Washington would like to see a more engaged and forthcoming Turkish government.

Turkey's current verbal commitment to solve the Kurdish problem is a step in the right direction for Washington precisely because it shows that Ankara has at least some willingness and courage to focus on its own most crucial problem. US officials hope that with more democratization and specifically with more openings on Kurdish cultural rights, the PKK will lose political support. This, in turn, will pave the way for more peaceful Kurdish alternatives and political movements. It is with the same spirit that Washington has been supportive of improved relations between Ankara and the Kurdish Regional Government in Iraq.

However, one should not expect Washington to speak out loudly in favor of the AKP's Kurdish policy. There will be silence on these sensitive domestic issues and particularly on the need for an amnesty and rehabilitation program for PKK militants willing to lay down their arms. The reason is simple. The Obama administration is a strong believer in realpolitik. As it has shown this trait with its measured reaction to events in Iran, the new US administration does not want to interfere in sensitive areas such as human rights and democracy, the way the Bush administration's “freedom agenda” did in the Middle East between 2003 and 2005. The last thing the Obama administration wants is to provide ammunition to those who are willing to see an American conspiracy behind every effort at democratization. Given the persistent anti-Americanism in Turkey, Washington will do its best to maintain a low profile while Turks discuss their own Kurdish problem.

03 August 2009, Monday
ÖMER TAŞPINAR
   
Articles of Today
The ‘Armenian problem,’ intellectuals and politicians in Turkey
ŞAHİN ALPAY
Process (mis) management
YAVUZ BAYDAR
It’s good to know you’re in good hands
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
Can the AK Party change the Constitution?
İHSAN DAĞI
How to go for growth in Turkey
ASIM ERDİLEK
From zero problems to zero progress
ÖMER TAŞPINAR
Fraudulent activity regarding deeds -- Bodrum and other cities (1)
BERK ÇEKTİR
Reasons behind Erdoğan’s controversial statement
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK

Other Articles of the Columnist

  Ankara’s Kurdish opening and Washington
  Iran and Iraq: diverging Shiite patterns
  Domestic determinants of Turkish foreign policy (2)
  Domestic determinants of Turkish foreign policy
  De-mystifying political Islam
  Iran’s legitimacy crisis
  Iran’s election: Free and fair?
  Obama’s speech and Pakistan
  Oil: blessing or curse for Iraqi Kurds?
  Turkey’s about-face in the Caucasus
  A grand bargain in the Middle East?
  Ergenekon and the West
  Washington’s Pakistan predicament
  Dodging a bullet with Washington
  Obama’s diminishing expectations of the world
  NATO, Afghanistan and Turkey’s role
  Obama in Turkey, Turkey in Europe
  For the European Union, despite the European Union
  Smart public diplomacy
  Time to reward Obama
Columnists
ABDULHAMİT BİLİCİ
ABDULLAH BOZKURT
ALİ BULAÇ
ALİ H. ASLAN
AMANDA PAUL
ANDREW FINKEL
ASIM ERDİLEK
AYŞE KARABAT
BEJAN MATUR
BERİL DEDEOĞLU
BERK ÇEKTİR
BÜLENT KENEŞ
BÜLENT KORUCU
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
DOĞU ERGİL
EKREM DUMANLI
EMRE USLU
ETYEN MAHÇUPYAN
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK
FİKRET ERTAN
GÜRKAN ZENGİN
HASAN KANBOLAT
HÜSEYİN GÜLERCE
İBRAHİM KALIN
İBRAHİM ÖZTÜRK
İHSAN DAĞI
İHSAN YILMAZ
KATHY HAMILTON
KERİM BALCI
KLAUS JURGENS
LALE KEMAL
MEHMET KAMIŞ
MICHAEL KUSER
MUHAMMED ÇETİN
MÜMTAZER TÜRKÖNE
NICOLE POPE
ÖMER TAŞPINAR
ORHAN KEMAL CENGİZ
PAT YALE
ŞAHİN ALPAY
SELÇUK GÜLTAŞLI
SUAT KINIKLIOĞLU
YAVUZ BAYDAR