About us | Advertising | Contact | Get Home Delivery | Archive
Mar 22, 2010 Homepage
News
Business
Interviews
Columnists
Op-Ed
Arts & Culture
Expat Zone
Features
Travel
Leisure
Life
Cartoons
Women
Health Briefs
Weird But True
Sports
Turkish Press Review
Today's think tanks
Turkey in Foreign Press

Columnists
İHSAN DAĞI i.dagi@todayszaman.com Columnists

Is the West supporting coup supporters?


I don't know of any other country where democracy is wanted so badly and is deemed so fit, yet is under so much of a threat. One the one hand, democracy is the key to solving all problems and, on the other hand, it is the most feared thing.

Today's interactive toolbox
Bookmark and Share
Video Photo Audio
Send to print Send to my friend
Post your comments
Read comments
Those who fear democracy and plan conspiracies against it are actually a small minority in both Turkey and the world. It is for this reason the “conspiracies” are not supported by the majority of the public or by other global powers.

We know that in the past those who could not find public support for anti-democratic activities sought and ultimately won the support of “foreign bosses.” Every coup until now has explicitly or implicitly been supported by the US. Generals that are standing trial today for attempting a coup in the past tried to win the US's support in 2003 and 2004 for their coup plans. But when the US refused, they turned to Russia. By the time they realized that they would not be able to stage a coup with Russia's support and turned back to the US in 2007, the neocons with which they had connections had already lost their influence in Washington. The situation completely changed after Barack Obama was elected president. Turkish coup leaders had no connections with the new administration nor any known neocons left in Washington. While the Ergenekon investigation continued, instead of directly intervening in politics, the military willingly retreated to its traditional “tutelage regime.”

It's impossible for coup leaders to find support in the US after this hour. With the withdrawal process starting in Iraq, the instability in Afghanistan, the ongoing chaos in Pakistan and the uncertainty in Iran following the presidential elections, the last thing the US administration wants is for chaos to start in Turkey.

Turkey's “democratic stability” is integral and indispensable for the international system. If Turkey's democratic stability is damaged as a result of the bureaucratic traps set against society and political institutions, then Turkey will turn into not only a regional but a global “security” problem. Everyone knows that instead of resolving problems with the Kurds in Iraq, the Armenians in the Caucasus and the Greeks in Cyprus, Turkey will be in constant conflict with them.

It is for this reason that Turkey's “democratic stability” is necessary for regional and global balances. It is Turkey's democracy that makes it valuable and powerful. We know that was not the case in the past. During the Cold War years, the only reason Turkey was a member of the Western bloc was because of its strategic location for the US. How and by whom Turkey was led was not important for them. But today, their views are much different. There is a general view that a Turkey that lacks democracy will not only cause instability within the country, but also constitute a problem for the region. More importantly, a Turkey without democracy will create a problem for the US.

The reason for this is clear since anti-democratic forces similar to the Ergenekon gang clearly aim to separate Turkey from the West and isolate it. Moreover, it is certain that in the event of this kind of an administration, Turkey will no longer be a country that gives stability and security to the region. Authoritarian regimes are known for adopting aggressive foreign policies in an effort to find legitimacy and social support, provoking neighbors and other world governments and wanting to strengthen the regime by inciting tension in the public.

In the end, the US's vision for Turkey is not based on absolute “strategic” plans; the “democracy” element is indispensable as well. In other words, the news is bad for coup enthusiasts. Now Turkey has an opportunity to strengthen its democracy. It can achieve that by reviving the European Union process, continuing democratic reforms and proceeding with the Ergenekon investigation in a determined and legal fashion. As for the military, it must get rid of coup and junta supporters. No one can tolerate juntas within a NATO army any longer.

A Turkey that loses its democratic character will not have a place in the Western world or influence in the East.

29 June 2009, Monday
İHSAN DAĞI
Comments on this article

ekundayo80 , Jun 29 2009 14:33, Monday
This article is very good because you revealed good projections for Turkey's politician life and its' importance of all ...

Click to read the details of comments
   
Articles of Today
The ‘Armenian problem,’ intellectuals and politicians in Turkey
ŞAHİN ALPAY
Process (mis) management
YAVUZ BAYDAR
It’s good to know you’re in good hands
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
Can the AK Party change the Constitution?
İHSAN DAĞI
How to go for growth in Turkey
ASIM ERDİLEK
From zero problems to zero progress
ÖMER TAŞPINAR
Fraudulent activity regarding deeds -- Bodrum and other cities (1)
BERK ÇEKTİR
Reasons behind Erdoğan’s controversial statement
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK

Other Articles of the Columnist

  Is the West supporting coup supporters?
  Can the islamic republic survive?
  The Turkish military: asset or liability?
  The poverty of the ‘white Turks’
  Islamization of population by the Kemalists
  Why is it the right time to solve the Kurdish question?
  The militarist right as an alternative to the AK Party
  Who is Demirel? Where is the center right?
  Appeasing the military by abandoning the EU
  Davutoğlu: Turkey’s new foreign policy chief
  What is Başbuğ trying to do?
  The Armenian question, Turkey and the US
  The university of Ergenekon
  Turkey between Armenia and Azerbaijan
  Has the AK Party been defeated?
  What’s next?
  Toward a post-PKK era in Kurdish politics
  Islamic identity in post-Kemalist Turkey and the West
  Who will stop the AK Party?
  Is democracy possible with this military?
Columnists
ABDULHAMİT BİLİCİ
ABDULLAH BOZKURT
ALİ BULAÇ
ALİ H. ASLAN
AMANDA PAUL
ANDREW FINKEL
ASIM ERDİLEK
AYŞE KARABAT
BEJAN MATUR
BERİL DEDEOĞLU
BERK ÇEKTİR
BÜLENT KENEŞ
BÜLENT KORUCU
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
DOĞU ERGİL
EKREM DUMANLI
EMRE USLU
ETYEN MAHÇUPYAN
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK
FİKRET ERTAN
GÜRKAN ZENGİN
HASAN KANBOLAT
HÜSEYİN GÜLERCE
İBRAHİM KALIN
İBRAHİM ÖZTÜRK
İHSAN DAĞI
İHSAN YILMAZ
KATHY HAMILTON
KERİM BALCI
KLAUS JURGENS
LALE KEMAL
MEHMET KAMIŞ
MICHAEL KUSER
MUHAMMED ÇETİN
MÜMTAZER TÜRKÖNE
NICOLE POPE
ÖMER TAŞPINAR
ORHAN KEMAL CENGİZ
PAT YALE
ŞAHİN ALPAY
SELÇUK GÜLTAŞLI
SUAT KINIKLIOĞLU
YAVUZ BAYDAR