About us | Advertising | Contact | Get Home Delivery | Archive
Mar 20, 2010 Homepage
News
Business
Interviews
Columnists
Op-Ed
Arts & Culture
Expat Zone
Features
Travel
Leisure
Life
Cartoons
Women
Health Briefs
Weird But True
Sports
Turkish Press Review
Today's think tanks
Turkey in Foreign Press

Columnists
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK f.zibak@todayszaman.com Columnists

General Staff statement not surprising


A statement released by the General Staff's Military Prosecutor's Office on Wednesday disclosing the results of an investigation into an alleged military plot to discredit the ruling Justice and Development Party (AK Party) and the faith-based Gülen movement has fallen short of answering many questions regarding the plan.

Today's interactive toolbox
Bookmark and Share
Video Photo Audio
Send to print Send to my friend
Post your comments
Read comments
In the statement, the prosecutor's office stressed that it reached the conclusion that there was no evidence the document was prepared by any department of the General Staff. “No indication of an order for the preparation of such a document [by members of the military] has been discovered. As the original version of the document has not been found, the General Staff's Military Prosecutor's Office has decided that there is no need for legal proceedings against the colonel [Dursun Çiçek, who allegedly signed the document],” read the statement. When this investigation was launched by the Military Prosecutor's Office, almost everyone was sure that it would not bear satisfactory results or punish those responsible for preparing such an outrageous plan because there were serious doubts about the neutrality of the military judiciary, and Wednesday's statement proved that these doubts were justified.

 In consideration of the military prosecutor's statement, Sabah's Emre Aköz wonders why the General Staff did not deny the existence of this document at the very first moment and why this investigation, which could have been completed in two days, lasted 12 days. “Why were the civilian prosecutors prevented from investigating Col. Çiçek? When the criminal reports proved that the signature on the document belonged to Çiçek, why did the General Staff release such a contradictory statement? Do General Staff personnel prepare action plans in their spare time in tea houses?” asks Aköz. He says the statements, accusations and evidence circulating over the past 12 days suggest that this document was prepared in the General Staff headquarters, noting that he has no doubts about this. “But the rest of the scenario is complicated: the action plan was either prepared upon an order from Chief of General Staff Gen. İlker Başbuğ or a pro-coup group within the Turkish Armed Forces (TSK) that is against Başbuğ,” writes Aköz.

Yeni Şafak's Ali Bayramoğlu interprets the military prosecutor's statement as acknowledging the existence of such a document but leaving questions about where it came from, whether it is fake or genuine and whether it belongs to Col. Çiçek unanswered. He says the Military Prosecutor's Office did not expand the investigation; it issued a verdict and saw the launch of a case into the colonel as unnecessary. Questioning this, Bayramoğlu says this means an end to judicial proceedings into the document. “Some may find this harsh but a coup investigation that was launched upon a military order can only bear this much. The military judiciary is as successful as military music,” he says.

Star's Mehmet Altan says he was not surprised by the military prosecutor's statement because he was not expecting the General Staff to expel those involved in the conspiracy from the military at the end of the investigation. He even says Wednesday's statement has strengthened his belief in the authenticity of the alleged military action plan.

26 June 2009, Friday
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK
   
Articles of Today
The ‘genocide’ problem: states, parliaments and people
BERİL DEDEOĞLU
Greek Cypriots blocking Turkey’s judicial reform
ABDULHAMİT BİLİCİ
Opportunity for judicial reform
MÜMTAZER TÜRKÖNE
Who is who?
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
Either the state or a raven’s carcass
MEHMET KAMIŞ
Let it play out for everyone’s sake
ABDULLAH BOZKURT
‘Model partner’ or ‘genocide offender’?
GÜRKAN ZENGİN
Can (Turkish) soccer hooliganism be stopped?
KLAUS JURGENS
A small package but a big step for democracy
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK

Other Articles of the Columnist

  General Staff statement not surprising
  Repercussions of Baykal’s call to settle accounts with Sept. 12
  Weighing in on Iranian unrest
  Fake or genuine?
  Plot brings the military judiciary into the spotlight
  A fabricated plot won’t save the military’s image
  Military-civilian relations and a controversial plot
  General Staff statement far from reassuring
  The politicians’ move in General Staff plan controversy
  TSK plot scandalous, disappointing
  Will change come to Iran?
  The CHP and internal opposition to Turkey’s EU entry
  Turkey in urgent need of reforms
  EP election results not an obstacle before Turkey’s EU entry
  The relationship between secularism and economic growth
  Obama speech promising, inspirational
  Demining bill passed, but debate continues
  Are critics right in their opposition to mine clearing?
  Turkey, northern Iraq bury the hatchet
  Turkey and peace, closer than ever
Columnists
ABDULHAMİT BİLİCİ
ABDULLAH BOZKURT
ALİ BULAÇ
ALİ H. ASLAN
AMANDA PAUL
ANDREW FINKEL
ASIM ERDİLEK
AYŞE KARABAT
BEJAN MATUR
BERİL DEDEOĞLU
BERK ÇEKTİR
BÜLENT KENEŞ
BÜLENT KORUCU
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
DOĞU ERGİL
EKREM DUMANLI
EMRE USLU
ETYEN MAHÇUPYAN
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK
FİKRET ERTAN
GÜRKAN ZENGİN
HASAN KANBOLAT
HÜSEYİN GÜLERCE
İBRAHİM KALIN
İBRAHİM ÖZTÜRK
İHSAN DAĞI
İHSAN YILMAZ
KATHY HAMILTON
KERİM BALCI
KLAUS JURGENS
LALE KEMAL
MEHMET KAMIŞ
MICHAEL KUSER
MUHAMMED ÇETİN
MÜMTAZER TÜRKÖNE
NICOLE POPE
ÖMER TAŞPINAR
ORHAN KEMAL CENGİZ
PAT YALE
ŞAHİN ALPAY
SELÇUK GÜLTAŞLI
SUAT KINIKLIOĞLU
YAVUZ BAYDAR