About us | Advertising | Contact | Get Home Delivery | Archive
Mar 18, 2010 Homepage
News
Business
Interviews
Columnists
Op-Ed
Arts & Culture
Expat Zone
Features
Travel
Leisure
Life
Cartoons
Women
Health Briefs
Weird But True
Sports
Turkish Press Review
Today's think tanks
Turkey in Foreign Press

Columnists
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK f.zibak@todayszaman.com Columnists

Repercussions of Baykal’s call to settle accounts with Sept. 12


Main opposition Republican People's Party (CHP) leader Deniz Baykal drew the ire of many on Monday when he said Turkey can settle accounts with the Sept. 12, 1980 military coup, the third military intervention in the history of the republic and a bleeding wound on the country's path to democracy.

Today's interactive toolbox
Bookmark and Share
Video Photo Audio
Send to print Send to my friend
Post your comments
Read comments

Speaking during his party's parliamentary group meeting on Tuesday, Baykal also said that if the public desires to see the Sept. 12 coup leaders and other coup plotters called to account, he and his party are ready to give any kind of support. and called the government to try those who led coups. While supporting Baykal's call, analysts have also questioned his sincerity and motives.

Ahmet Kekeç from the Star daily agrees with Baykal's call to confront the Sept. 12 coup but has questions for him. “You say you oppose the Sept. 12 coup. Why then do you not oppose the others? Why do you not say with the same courage and clarity, ‘I also oppose the May 27 [1960 coup], the Feb. 28 [1997 postmodern coup], the April 27 [2007] e-memorandum and all memorandums',” he asks. Stating that he does not believe in Baykal's sincerity in opposing Sept. 12, Kekeç says the fact that Baykal has no problem with the institutions formed by the Sept. 12 coup is a sign of his lack of sincerity. “After all, I agree with you in that Turkey can settle accounts with coups and start settling my accounts with them. [Sept. 12 coup leader] Kenan Evren should be tried. Those who staged the Feb. 28 postmodern coup should be tried. Politicians [such as Baykal] who legitimized Feb. 28 by saying, ‘The military is a significant means of pressure contributing to the formation of civil public opinion,' should be tried,” he adds.

According to Radikal's Murat Yetkin, Baykal has other concerns while calling on the government to temporarily lift Article 15 of the Constitution, which exempts coup leaders from being tried. “Baykal's call seems to have been made by presupposing that the Justice and Development Party [AK Party] would not take such a step in order to avoid being at odds with the military once again [in the aftermath of a recently revealed alleged military action plan to undermine the ruling party],” he says.

Adem Yavuz Arslan from the Bugün daily elaborates on Baykal's remarks, drawing attention to legal obstacles in front of prosecutors who wish to try coup leaders, as Turkey has witnessed attempts to try coup leaders in the past. Recalling Baykal's remarks when he said, “Is there anybody preventing the government from trying coup leaders?” Arslan says: “It is not known whether there is something preventing the government from taking action. But there is something preventing the prosecutors [from taking action].” Recalling a past attempt by former prosecutor Sacit Kayasu, who prepared an indictment against Evren in 2000 that resulted in Kayasu's disbarment by the Supreme Board of Prosecutors and Judges (HSYK), he says the HSYK  is the biggest obstacle to such attempts.

25 June 2009, Thursday
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK
   
Articles of Today
Turkey and the SIPRI report
LALE KEMAL
Five questions for Mr. Başbuğ
HÜSEYİN GÜLERCE
Constructive ambiguity and destructive obscurity
KERİM BALCI
Will Turkey ever walk alone?
ANDREW FINKEL
Islam, democracy and Turkey
İBRAHİM KALIN
Wanted: democratic opposition in Turkey
MUHAMMED ÇETİN
Spring fever
PAT YALE
A direct intervention in the judiciary
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK

Other Articles of the Columnist

  Repercussions of Baykal’s call to settle accounts with Sept. 12
  Weighing in on Iranian unrest
  Fake or genuine?
  Plot brings the military judiciary into the spotlight
  A fabricated plot won’t save the military’s image
  Military-civilian relations and a controversial plot
  General Staff statement far from reassuring
  The politicians’ move in General Staff plan controversy
  TSK plot scandalous, disappointing
  Will change come to Iran?
  The CHP and internal opposition to Turkey’s EU entry
  Turkey in urgent need of reforms
  EP election results not an obstacle before Turkey’s EU entry
  The relationship between secularism and economic growth
  Obama speech promising, inspirational
  Demining bill passed, but debate continues
  Are critics right in their opposition to mine clearing?
  Turkey, northern Iraq bury the hatchet
  Turkey and peace, closer than ever
  Taking fingers off the trigger
Columnists
ABDULHAMİT BİLİCİ
ABDULLAH BOZKURT
ALİ BULAÇ
ALİ H. ASLAN
AMANDA PAUL
ANDREW FINKEL
ASIM ERDİLEK
AYŞE KARABAT
BEJAN MATUR
BERİL DEDEOĞLU
BERK ÇEKTİR
BÜLENT KENEŞ
BÜLENT KORUCU
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
DOĞU ERGİL
EKREM DUMANLI
EMRE USLU
ETYEN MAHÇUPYAN
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK
FİKRET ERTAN
GÜRKAN ZENGİN
HASAN KANBOLAT
HÜSEYİN GÜLERCE
İBRAHİM KALIN
İBRAHİM ÖZTÜRK
İHSAN DAĞI
İHSAN YILMAZ
KATHY HAMILTON
KERİM BALCI
KLAUS JURGENS
LALE KEMAL
MEHMET KAMIŞ
MICHAEL KUSER
MUHAMMED ÇETİN
MÜMTAZER TÜRKÖNE
NICOLE POPE
ÖMER TAŞPINAR
ORHAN KEMAL CENGİZ
PAT YALE
ŞAHİN ALPAY
SELÇUK GÜLTAŞLI
SUAT KINIKLIOĞLU
YAVUZ BAYDAR