About us | Advertising | Contact | Get Home Delivery | Archive
Mar 19, 2010 Homepage
News
Business
Interviews
Columnists
Op-Ed
Arts & Culture
Expat Zone
Features
Travel
Leisure
Life
Cartoons
Women
Health Briefs
Weird But True
Sports
Turkish Press Review
Today's think tanks
Turkey in Foreign Press

Columnists
İHSAN DAĞI i.dagi@todayszaman.com Columnists

The poverty of the ‘white Turks’


They are educated at the best high schools and universities in Turkey and the world; they are rich, belonging to a high social and economic class; they are professionals travelling the world. Yet they are intolerant, aggressive, narrow-minded, anti-democratic and militarist.

Today's interactive toolbox
Bookmark and Share
Video Photo Audio
Send to print Send to my friend
Post your comments
Read comments
This is the portrait of the “white Turks” as reflected in a piece of research conducted by academics Füsun Üstel and Birol Caymaz from İstanbul Bilgi University titled ”Elites and Social Distance.”

The researchers did in-depth interviews with 40 individuals who are professionals with top high school and university diplomas. They are Kemalist, nationalist (uluslacı) and Republican People's Party (CHP) voters, according to the research. They read daily newspapers Hürriyet, Cumhuriyet and Vatan.

The profiles of those interviewed by the researchers are high, but the responses received are very “low.” One is shocked by how an elite education and high social and economic standing can result in such poor political judgment and values. I can comfortably bet that you would get more inclusive, tolerant, democratic answers from the ordinary poor people of Turkey, even in a remote village coffeehouse. What we have at hand is an elite (the white Turks) who are well behind the ordinary people of the country. The white Turks are more conservative than the conservative-religious people, more reactionary and more opposed to change.

In short the white Turks represent, I think, the lowest degree of political values in Turkey. Their political and social ideas are anachronistic, outdated, reactionary and authoritarian. Theirs is poverty in full.

These best-educated people think that Turkey is under occupation. Occupation by whom? The foreign capital, for instance, they work for; Western countries to which they often travel. “Ordinary people” do not deserve citizenship: the Kurds, the Islamists and the non-Muslims are the groups that represent the ultimate “others” of the white Turks.

Against all this they think a “new war of liberation” needs to be waged. They do not, of course, have the guts to take up the struggle themselves but call on the military to do the “business” using the manpower -- soldiers -- who are the children of the people against which the war is to be conducted. Clever but not realistic, isn't it?

One says “the military is entitled to use force against the AKP [Justice and Development Party] either as a legal organization or as a paramilitary entity or a guerilla force.” This is reflective of the white Turks' understanding of legality, law and patriotism. It is obvious that they do not care if the country is in ashes. What matters is keeping their power intact.

The similarity to a statement last week from the chief public prosecutor is striking. Remember what Yalçınkaya said: "As conservative political parties became more concentrated on economic development and modernization, we forgot about secularism.” By "conservative" he is implying all center-right parties since the Democrat Party of the 1950s.

Secularism is the way in which the state is organized independent of religion. It does not block economic development or vice versa. But for him and others it is better to keep the level of economic development low so that society can be controlled by the Kemalist state.

In any case, the research also discloses a high degree of anti-Western and anti-EU attitude on the part of the white Turks. The reason for their objection to the EU differs, but the underlying factor is obvious: the democratic transformation that is required for the EU process. This is not surprising since this group is fearful of democracy and democratization; thus, the EU's demands on this line are viewed as threatening.

I really pity those “white Turks.” All their elite education and accumulated wealth do not help them overcome their neurotic state of mind.

Do they represent the elite of Turkey? Certainly not. They are the remnant of the old elite who are passé now. The new Turkish elite are more sophisticated and capable of understanding social, economic and political trends in Turkey and the world.

Reading about the white Turks' thoughts and beliefs and the way they understand the world one easily understands why they are hateful, angry and losers. Such primitive thinking cannot survive in this complicated world. It is time to say “adios” to them and their allies in bureaucracy, civil society and media.  

We know today that there are new and competing elites in Turkey, in which the Kemalist white Turks are a very small minority. Among them are the conservative elite. It would be striking to compare the views of the white Turks and the conservative elite on democracy, EU membership, the role of the military in politics, and rights and freedoms. Then one will see which elite group is more in tune with global trends. For this I recommend an article by Kamil Yılmaz that appeared in Insight Turkey (Vol.11, No.2, 2009), “The Emergence and Rise of Conservative Elite in Turkey.”

08 June 2009, Monday
İHSAN DAĞI
Comments on this article

Kaya , Nov 12 2009 17:23, Thursday
What do you mean by White Turks? I as a Turk consider myself white, along with many of my fellow countrymen. We form ...
T. Kilinc , Sep 29 2009 00:11, Tuesday
Mr. Dagi: I find it quite amusing that you and your "tolerance" refer to white Turks as hateful, intolerant, angry and ...
Duygu Aysun , Aug 14 2009 14:02, Friday
The only fact that this work is a "research work" done in Academia does not give any legitimacy to these ridiculous clai...

Click to read the details of comments
   
Articles of Today
All in the family
NICOLE POPE
A new closure case under way?
YAVUZ BAYDAR
Taner Akçam’s letter to the prime minister regarding the Armenian question
ORHAN KEMAL CENGİZ
How many hundreds of thousands of informants are there in Turkey?
HÜSEYİN GÜLERCE
Misled by appearance
ALİ BULAÇ
Saving face
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
The Armenian genocide and disgrace
ETYEN MAHÇUPYAN
Erdoğan’s unwelcome remarks
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK

Other Articles of the Columnist

  The poverty of the ‘white Turks’
  Islamization of population by the Kemalists
  Why is it the right time to solve the Kurdish question?
  The militarist right as an alternative to the AK Party
  Who is Demirel? Where is the center right?
  Appeasing the military by abandoning the EU
  Davutoğlu: Turkey’s new foreign policy chief
  What is Başbuğ trying to do?
  The Armenian question, Turkey and the US
  The university of Ergenekon
  Turkey between Armenia and Azerbaijan
  Has the AK Party been defeated?
  What’s next?
  Toward a post-PKK era in Kurdish politics
  Islamic identity in post-Kemalist Turkey and the West
  Who will stop the AK Party?
  Is democracy possible with this military?
  The liberal turn in Turkish foreign policy
  If Israel loses Turkish public support
  Who can answer these questions?
Columnists
ABDULHAMİT BİLİCİ
ABDULLAH BOZKURT
ALİ BULAÇ
ALİ H. ASLAN
AMANDA PAUL
ANDREW FINKEL
ASIM ERDİLEK
AYŞE KARABAT
BEJAN MATUR
BERİL DEDEOĞLU
BERK ÇEKTİR
BÜLENT KENEŞ
BÜLENT KORUCU
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
DOĞU ERGİL
EKREM DUMANLI
EMRE USLU
ETYEN MAHÇUPYAN
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK
FİKRET ERTAN
GÜRKAN ZENGİN
HASAN KANBOLAT
HÜSEYİN GÜLERCE
İBRAHİM KALIN
İBRAHİM ÖZTÜRK
İHSAN DAĞI
İHSAN YILMAZ
KATHY HAMILTON
KERİM BALCI
KLAUS JURGENS
LALE KEMAL
MEHMET KAMIŞ
MICHAEL KUSER
MUHAMMED ÇETİN
MÜMTAZER TÜRKÖNE
NICOLE POPE
ÖMER TAŞPINAR
ORHAN KEMAL CENGİZ
PAT YALE
ŞAHİN ALPAY
SELÇUK GÜLTAŞLI
SUAT KINIKLIOĞLU
YAVUZ BAYDAR