About us | Advertising | Contact | Get Home Delivery | Archive
Mar 19, 2010 Homepage
News
Business
Interviews
Columnists
Op-Ed
Arts & Culture
Expat Zone
Features
Travel
Leisure
Life
Cartoons
Women
Health Briefs
Weird But True
Sports
Turkish Press Review
Today's think tanks
Turkey in Foreign Press

Columnists
LALE KEMAL loglu@todayszaman.com Columnists

Gönül as Turkish defense minister


The government finally made a long-awaited major Cabinet reshuffle late last week, anticipated since it first took office following the November 2002 general elections. Since then two elections -- early general elections in July 2007 and the March 29 local elections this year - have been held. The ruling Justice and Development Party's (AK Party) roughly 8 percent loss in the municipal elections, compared to the 2004 elections, played the main role in the major reshuffle. There was a minor Cabinet reshuffle following the 2007 July elections, which did not signal a fresh start at all.

Today's interactive toolbox
Bookmark and Share
Video Photo Audio
Send to print Send to my friend
Post your comments
Read comments

The reshuffle has come late because Turkey has needed a fresh start since 2005, the year that it has abandoned major military and civilian reforms, disappointing those Turks who extended overwhelming support to the AK Party's first term, during which historic democratic steps were made.

In the 27-member Cabinet, eight ministers were removed and nine new faces became ministers. Seven were moved to different posts. The performance of the new ministers will tell us whether the major change in ministries will mean the resumption of reforms in all spheres.

Minister of Health Recep Akdağ and Minister of Defense Vecdi Gönül, however, have broken a record by retaining their posts since the November 2002 elections that brought the AK Party to power.

Akdağ has pioneered serious reforms in the health sector, though it is still deprived of a budget that can effectively address the ailing sector's huge problems. His reforms helped redress the grievances of the health sector to a certain extent, but he could not break the strong lobby of doctors that run lucrative private clinics while refusing to treat patients at a much cheaper price in the hospitals that they work for.

The Turkish Defense Ministry under Gönül has also introduced a new defense procurement strategy that has been boosting the domestic production of arms systems, for which Turkey has relied upon imports for decades, by about 25 percent. However, in this positive change, credit should be given to Murad Bayar, the head of the Undersecretariat for the Defense Industry (SSM), who has played a major role in boosting the domestic defense industry while reducing the intervention of the military in arms procurement. A clear-cut division in the relationship of the user (the military) and the buyer (civilians) in the defense industry is among the key elements of transparency and accountability; such a relationship also avoids accusations of corruption against the military.

But apart from supporting Bayar and the government in the introduction of a policy to make the domestic industry more efficient in the local production of arms systems, Gönül has not made any efforts to help the government reduce the political power of the country's Turkish Armed Forces (TSK). He is still the only civilian at the Ministry of Defense, which is stuffed full of uniformed men; meanwhile, the TSK is not subordinated to him, but to Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan.

Chief of General Staff Gen. İlker Başbuğ's two latest meetings with the press, during which he talked on political issues that do not fall within the military's responsibilities, have displayed Gönül and the political authority's inability, in general, to fully take political issues under the ministry's control.

By keeping Gönül in the position of defense minister, the government has made a statement that it is no different than that of previous governments in Turkey when it comes to appointing low-profile figures to this controversial position.

Turkish defense ministers, thus, can neither satisfy the reformists in Turkey nor the TSK, as both represent opposing views, with the former seeking to bring democratic standards to the TSK and the latter resisting a reduction of its power in politics.

Low-profile defense ministers are always caught between those two opposing views, failing to satisfy either side.

Gen. Başbuğ's April 14 speech reaffirmed the military's thinking that there is a special situation in Turkey that does not require the military to reduce its power in politics. However, Başbuğ underlined how urgent the military reforms are for Turkey, in order to enable the TSK to execute its sole duty of defending the country against possible threats.

05 May 2009, Tuesday
LALE KEMAL
   
Articles of Today
All in the family
NICOLE POPE
A new closure case under way?
YAVUZ BAYDAR
Taner Akçam’s letter to the prime minister regarding the Armenian question
ORHAN KEMAL CENGİZ
How many hundreds of thousands of informants are there in Turkey?
HÜSEYİN GÜLERCE
Misled by appearance
ALİ BULAÇ
Saving face
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
The Armenian genocide and disgrace
ETYEN MAHÇUPYAN
Erdoğan’s unwelcome remarks
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK

Other Articles of the Columnist

  Gönül as Turkish defense minister
  Turkish-Syrian military cooperation
  Military’s rationale behind PKK-DTP operations
  High-ranking military not to be further scrutinized in Ergenekon probe
  Ergenekon’s possible link with Council of State attack
  Gen. Başbuğ’s emphasis on democracy versus media ban
  Azerbaijan’s dangerous dance with Russia
  Obama puts his stamp on a new era with Turkey
  Turkey’s nuisance value has its limits
  Kurdish message to Ankara: Respect us
  Time for reforms
  Turkey’s dilemma at NATO: France and Rasmussen
  Turkish Parliament should assume its duty
  Obama may select Iran as venue for major speech
  Gül clarifies Turkish policy on Iran’s nuclear ambitions
  Return to reforms is essential for Turkish cohesion
  Hillary’s Turkey visit and genocide claims
  Is Turkey vital for US exit strategy from Iraq?
  Command center in Arbil and tactical problems
  Defense spending and democracy
Columnists
ABDULHAMİT BİLİCİ
ABDULLAH BOZKURT
ALİ BULAÇ
ALİ H. ASLAN
AMANDA PAUL
ANDREW FINKEL
ASIM ERDİLEK
AYŞE KARABAT
BEJAN MATUR
BERİL DEDEOĞLU
BERK ÇEKTİR
BÜLENT KENEŞ
BÜLENT KORUCU
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
DOĞU ERGİL
EKREM DUMANLI
EMRE USLU
ETYEN MAHÇUPYAN
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK
FİKRET ERTAN
GÜRKAN ZENGİN
HASAN KANBOLAT
HÜSEYİN GÜLERCE
İBRAHİM KALIN
İBRAHİM ÖZTÜRK
İHSAN DAĞI
İHSAN YILMAZ
KATHY HAMILTON
KERİM BALCI
KLAUS JURGENS
LALE KEMAL
MEHMET KAMIŞ
MICHAEL KUSER
MUHAMMED ÇETİN
MÜMTAZER TÜRKÖNE
NICOLE POPE
ÖMER TAŞPINAR
ORHAN KEMAL CENGİZ
PAT YALE
ŞAHİN ALPAY
SELÇUK GÜLTAŞLI
SUAT KINIKLIOĞLU
YAVUZ BAYDAR