About us | Advertising | Contact | Get Home Delivery | Archive
Mar 20, 2010 Homepage
News
Business
Interviews
Columnists
Op-Ed
Arts & Culture
Expat Zone
Features
Travel
Leisure
Life
Cartoons
Women
Health Briefs
Weird But True
Sports
Turkish Press Review
Today's think tanks
Turkey in Foreign Press

Columnists
LALE KEMAL loglu@todayszaman.com Columnists

Gül clarifies Turkish policy on Iran’s nuclear ambitions


Since Turkey launched a "zero problem" policy several years ago with neighbors it had been at odds with for centuries, rapprochement with Iran has remained a cause of friction because of the two countries' differing political systems. Despite its shortcomings, Turkey is governed by democratic secular principles while Iran is ruled by religious law.

Today's interactive toolbox
Bookmark and Share
Video Photo Audio
Send to print Send to my friend
Post your comments
Read comments

In the past several years there has been a standoff between Iran and the international community due to Iran's nuclear energy program, which is suspected of intending to obtain nuclear arms through uranium enrichment. Turkey, a party to the Treaty on the Non-proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), has stressed its opposition to the proliferation of nuclear arms in the Middle East but has, at the same time, been advocating dialogue with Iran as a means of persuading Tehran to abandon such plans -- if it has any. Turkey has also been against the severe sanctions imposed on Tehran; this stance was a source of friction with the US under former President George W. Bush's administration in particular as well as with Israel -- both countries that possess nuclear weapons.

However, Ankara has been supporting the international community's effort to convince Tehran to abandon its possible development of nuclear arms. At the same time, Ankara does not want its nuclear energy program to be prevented by the arguments used against Iran.

Generally the Turkish political authorities as well as the politically powerful Turkish Armed Forces (TSK) underline that the Middle East -- including Israel -- should be a nuclear-free zone.

In this sense, Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan's remarks made in Washington on Nov. 15 of last year that Turkey is against the proliferation of nuclear arms in its region fell in line with the abovementioned general policy of Ankara. Following his remarks was a statement noting that those who urge Iran not to acquire nuclear arms should not have nuclear arms in their own inventories; this position has sparked controversy among some nations -- mainly the US and Israel.

President Abdullah Gül's latest remarks on Iran's nuclear policy, however, come as a clarification of Turkey's policy on this issue.

On his way to Tehran to participate in the Economic Cooperation Organization (ECO) meeting held on Tuesday, Gül said Turkey would oppose Iran's desire to acquire nuclear weapons.

Gül's remarks not only clarified Turkey's stand on Iran's possible nuclear ambitions, but also marked a slight change in the Turkish perception that a nuclear Iran would not pose a threat to its Muslim neighbor.

A shift in the US's policy under President Barack Obama to seek dialogue with Iran, meanwhile, will alleviate Turkish-US unease over how to deal with Iran.

Turkey itself has decided to build nuclear plants as a means of meeting its growing energy needs in this energy-scarce country. But influential figures in the US have raised fears by arguing that if Iran was not prevented from enriching uranium, then regional countries -- including Turkey -- would be compelled to have the same capabilities as they move toward the development of their civilian nuclear power plants.

Brent Scowcroft, national security adviser to former President George H.W. Bush, testified on March 5 before the US Senate Committee on Foreign Relations and offered an outline of what he thought President Obama's approach to Iran should be. Scowcroft suggested that the United States offer to provide Iran and other countries with enriched uranium for nuclear power plants at a discount rate and take control of removing spent nuclear fuel.

"If Iran continues to enrich uranium, I suspect that Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Turkey will be compelled to have the same capability as they move toward development of their civilian nuclear power program," he said.

As a matter of fact, Turkey has already initiated a long-range missile program to thwart a possible missile threat that may come from its neighbors.

Murad Bayar, head of the Undersecretariat for the Defense Industry (SSM), was telling me recently that Turkey does not perceive Iran as a threat, but he also added that Ankara should include long-range missiles in its inventory for the first time, in order to protect the homeland against such threats.

A request for proposal (RfP) is expected to be released in April for the acquisition of 12 long-range air and missile defense systems (T-LORAMIDS) worth around $4 billion; this is a sign of the Turkish determination to accelerate this long-delayed project.

If Iran is not controlled, it is not out of the question that Turkey may resort to developing nuclear arms while accelerating its long-range missile acquisition project.

12 March 2009, Thursday
LALE KEMAL
Comments on this article

a.c , Mar 12 2009 05:53, Thursday
That exactlly what west wants for us to destroy each other in a split second ruther then figthing with each ither for ...

Click to read the details of comments
   
Articles of Today
The ‘genocide’ problem: states, parliaments and people
BERİL DEDEOĞLU
Greek Cypriots blocking Turkey’s judicial reform
ABDULHAMİT BİLİCİ
Opportunity for judicial reform
MÜMTAZER TÜRKÖNE
Who is who?
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
Either the state or a raven’s carcass
MEHMET KAMIŞ
Let it play out for everyone’s sake
ABDULLAH BOZKURT
‘Model partner’ or ‘genocide offender’?
GÜRKAN ZENGİN
Can (Turkish) soccer hooliganism be stopped?
KLAUS JURGENS
A small package but a big step for democracy
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK

Other Articles of the Columnist

  Gül clarifies Turkish policy on Iran’s nuclear ambitions
  Return to reforms is essential for Turkish cohesion
  Hillary’s Turkey visit and genocide claims
  Is Turkey vital for US exit strategy from Iraq?
  Command center in Arbil and tactical problems
  Defense spending and democracy
  Parliament neglects responsibility for probing questionable activities
  The gendarmerie’s ‘human face’
  Ergenekon appears to be going nowhere
  A NATO test for Turkey
  Strong Turkish-Israeli ties will create a better Middle East
  Crisis to revisit Turkish-US relations
  Will Gen. Koşaner maintain compromise?
  Turkey signals return to democratic process
  TSK a solid anchor for Israel, for now
  Ergenekon’s role in the delay of new counterterrorism unit
  Turkish NGO goes local to ease prejudices
  Intelligence wars in Ankara
  Turkish defense industry and the economic crisis
  Turbulent years ahead for Turkish democracy
Columnists
ABDULHAMİT BİLİCİ
ABDULLAH BOZKURT
ALİ BULAÇ
ALİ H. ASLAN
AMANDA PAUL
ANDREW FINKEL
ASIM ERDİLEK
AYŞE KARABAT
BEJAN MATUR
BERİL DEDEOĞLU
BERK ÇEKTİR
BÜLENT KENEŞ
BÜLENT KORUCU
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
DOĞU ERGİL
EKREM DUMANLI
EMRE USLU
ETYEN MAHÇUPYAN
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK
FİKRET ERTAN
GÜRKAN ZENGİN
HASAN KANBOLAT
HÜSEYİN GÜLERCE
İBRAHİM KALIN
İBRAHİM ÖZTÜRK
İHSAN DAĞI
İHSAN YILMAZ
KATHY HAMILTON
KERİM BALCI
KLAUS JURGENS
LALE KEMAL
MEHMET KAMIŞ
MICHAEL KUSER
MUHAMMED ÇETİN
MÜMTAZER TÜRKÖNE
NICOLE POPE
ÖMER TAŞPINAR
ORHAN KEMAL CENGİZ
PAT YALE
ŞAHİN ALPAY
SELÇUK GÜLTAŞLI
SUAT KINIKLIOĞLU
YAVUZ BAYDAR