About us | Advertising | Contact | Get Home Delivery | Archive
Mar 21, 2010 Homepage
News
Business
Interviews
Columnists
Op-Ed
Arts & Culture
Expat Zone
Features
Travel
Leisure
Life
Cartoons
Women
Health Briefs
Weird But True
Sports
Turkish Press Review
Today's think tanks
Turkey in Foreign Press

Columnists
ŞAHİN ALPAY s.alpay@todayszaman.com Columnists

Obama is good for the US, the world and Turkey, too


In a column that appeared at the beginning of this year, in reference to debates in Turkey about the nature of the US, I mainly argued as follows: America is a great democracy with a capacity to learn from its mistakes and correct itself.

Today's interactive toolbox
Bookmark and Share
Video Photo Audio
Send to print Send to my friend
Post your comments
Read comments
In the US there are basically two Americas in rivalry with each other -- one liberal and open to renewal, and the other conservative and resistant to change. If the former is in charge, America’s enormous power can be put in the service of the interests of mankind.

I, then, continued to say: “I consequently think that the US presidential election this year is of great importance for the global community. The Republican Party is dominated by neoconservatives (the core of the Israel lobby in the US) and Christian Zionists, both of which work against the interests of both the US and Israel itself. I therefore clearly am in favor of a Democratic president. I would not at all be disappointed if Hillary Clinton is elected the next president of the US, not only because that would constitute a great victory for women, but also because that would mean the return of the Clintons to the White House. But my real preference for the White House is surely Barack Obama, because part of his roots come from Africa, because his middle name is Hussein and because he seems to have the capacity to re-brand the US.” And I closed saying, “I admit, however, that my preferences rarely coincide with those of the American electorate.” (Jan. 14, 2008)

The American electorate’s choice in this election has, however, coincided with the choice of the people of the world. By electing Obama, the son of a black Muslim from Kenya and a white Protestant from Kansas, who has gone to school in Hawaii and Indonesia, attended the best American universities on scholarship and is a man of admirable intelligence and character, the US has proven that it is a great democracy that has the power to renew itself. By electing Obama president, the US is moving into the postmodern age, the age -- which means before anything else -- when irrespective of race, religion and ethnicity, all are accorded equal worth. The US has put in charge a truly global leader with ideas and a personality which people all over the world have respect for.

Some argue that if the financial crisis had not broken out just a few weeks before Election Day, if the Republicans had nominated a better candidate than John McCain, if McCain had not chosen the ignorant Sarah Palin as his running mate, if Dick Cheney had not made public his support for the Republican ticket, etc., Obama would not have been able to win. There is no doubt that the Republicans have failed, and failed badly in many respects. But the victory in this election was surely earned by the democrats of America and, especially, by the youth of America, who have mobilized their energy for change in the US and with it the world.

The US needed change, and the world needed change in the US. The Bush administration is not only responsible for the current financial crisis in the US, which is hurting economies worldwide, but its arrogant, unilateralist policies have ruined the image and reputation of the US all over the world. As underlined by Obama in his victory speech, the real power of the US rests not in the power of its economy or military, but in the power of the ideals of liberty and democracy which it stands for. People for peace, freedom and democracy all over the world now expect that with Obama in charge the US will no longer be what it was under President George W. Bush and will listen to its allies, respect international law, avoid militarism and use its enormous power to help solve problems of global concern.

Bush’s militarist policies have ruined the image and reputation of the US around the world, but perhaps nowhere as badly as in Turkey. A clear majority of Turks expressed favorable views of the US during the presidency of Bill Clinton, whereas the percentage of those who supported the US fell to single digits during the Bush administration. It was surely not anti-Americanism, but anti-Bushism that became so rampant in this country. The hope now is that Obama will repair the damage that has been done and will establish good relations between Ankara and Washington based on a mutual respect for national interests.

During his election campaign, Obama did not fail to underline “the importance of close relations between the US and a stable and democratic Turkey, the most advanced democracy in the Muslim world” and promised to restore the strategic partnership with Turkey that “has been deeply strained in recent years, most importantly by the Bush administration’s misguided and mismanaged intervention in Iraq.”

The election of Obama as president is not only good for the US and the world, but surely also for Turkey, if for no other reason than this one alone: Neoconservatives, who have openly preferred to see the military in charge in Ankara, will no longer be able to influence the White House. Militarists and coup plotters in Turkey can no longer count on support from Washington.

10 November 2008, Monday
ŞAHİN ALPAY
Comments on this article

jasper mortimer , Nov 13 2008 00:00, Thursday
A very nice piece, Sahin. A welcome departure from the nail-biting reaction to Obama's election that one encounters on t...
Cem Arda , Nov 10 2008 00:00, Monday
No matter who wins, i don't think American policy all over the world will change
umut , Nov 10 2008 00:00, Monday
I am little hopeless about Barrack Obama. It is known that outside of the copra is black, but if examine its inside, it ...

Click to read the details of comments
   
Articles of Today
Basic (wrong) instincts
ANDREW FINKEL
Wasted youth
AYŞE KARABAT
Tough days for Obama
AMANDA PAUL
İzmir’s future: urban (re-)development
KLAUS JURGENS
Armenians and our speaking prime minister
İHSAN YILMAZ
How much do we really know?
MICHAEL KUSER
Social and cultural impacts of globalization
DOĞU ERGİL
Impact of Iraqi elections on Kurdish politics
EMRE USLU

Other Articles of the Columnist

  Obama is good for the US, the world and Turkey, too
  Recognize Kurdish rights, isolate PKK
  Eradicate ‘Ergenekon,’ consolidate democracy
  Aktütün debate good for both army and democracy
  What ‘common European values’?
  Lessons in political public relations
  How to improve the Turkish media
  Congratulations President Gül
  Normalize relations with Armenia
  Ahmadinejad’s visit to Turkey is welcome
  Why sigh rather than celebrate?
  What if the AKP is closed?
  Checks and balances problem of Turkish democracy
  A Swedish witness to the ‘silent revolution’: Turkey decoded
  Why is the Turkish military involved in politics?
  End of the road to accession?
  Is nationalism fading in the Balkans?
  High time for post-Kemalism
  Does the West care?
  Who cares for democracy in Turkey?
Columnists
ABDULHAMİT BİLİCİ
ABDULLAH BOZKURT
ALİ BULAÇ
ALİ H. ASLAN
AMANDA PAUL
ANDREW FINKEL
ASIM ERDİLEK
AYŞE KARABAT
BEJAN MATUR
BERİL DEDEOĞLU
BERK ÇEKTİR
BÜLENT KENEŞ
BÜLENT KORUCU
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
DOĞU ERGİL
EKREM DUMANLI
EMRE USLU
ETYEN MAHÇUPYAN
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK
FİKRET ERTAN
GÜRKAN ZENGİN
HASAN KANBOLAT
HÜSEYİN GÜLERCE
İBRAHİM KALIN
İBRAHİM ÖZTÜRK
İHSAN DAĞI
İHSAN YILMAZ
KATHY HAMILTON
KERİM BALCI
KLAUS JURGENS
LALE KEMAL
MEHMET KAMIŞ
MICHAEL KUSER
MUHAMMED ÇETİN
MÜMTAZER TÜRKÖNE
NICOLE POPE
ÖMER TAŞPINAR
ORHAN KEMAL CENGİZ
PAT YALE
ŞAHİN ALPAY
SELÇUK GÜLTAŞLI
SUAT KINIKLIOĞLU
YAVUZ BAYDAR