About us | Advertising | Contact | Get Home Delivery | Archive
Mar 20, 2010 Homepage
News
Business
Interviews
Columnists
Op-Ed
Arts & Culture
Expat Zone
Features
Travel
Leisure
Life
Cartoons
Women
Health Briefs
Weird But True
Sports
Turkish Press Review
Today's think tanks
Turkey in Foreign Press

Columnists
ALİ BULAÇ a.bulac@todayszaman.com Columnists

Will the civilian massacres stop?


Thirty-seven civilians -- 23 children and 10 women -- were killed in an air strike conducted by American forces in Kandahar, a southern Afghan city, on the day when the black Democrat Barack Obama was elected the new president of the United States.

Today's interactive toolbox
Bookmark and Share
Video Photo Audio
Send to print Send to my friend
Post your comments
Read comments
Eyewitnesses noted at the hospital where the injured survivors were taken that the strike happened all of a sudden, leaving many dead civilians in its wake.

In his message of congratulation to Obama on his election as US president, Afghan President Hamid Karzai expressed hope that the new president would put an end to the ongoing situation in his country. The Afghan leader said: "Our hope is that there will be no civilian casualties in Afghanistan. We can't win the war against terror through air strikes. Stopping civilian casualties will be my first request from the new US president." Karzai has often criticized civilian casualties resulting from air strikes in the past.

The US military has announced that 33 civilians were killed in an air strike in Azizabad on Aug. 22. The Afghan government and the United Nations, however, said 90 civilians -- 60 of those being children - were killed in the strikes. The US initially announced seven civilian casualties, subsequently increasing the death toll after publication of cell phone footage. Likewise, 47 civilians were killed in another air strike against a wedding ceremony in Nangarhar in July. Human Rights Watch notes that 116 civilians were killed in air strikes in 2006, 321 in 2007 and 540 in the first eight months of this year.

Obama says he may seek to have unconditional talks with Iran and Syria, if necessary, and gradually withdraw their troops from Iraq over the course of the next 16 months. However, Obama has not made similar hopeful remarks when it comes to Afghanistan; he even stresses they will be decisive in their struggle against the Taliban. Of course, a relative easing and relief in relations with Iran, Afghanistan and Iraq is promising, but it should be remembered that the primary reason for growing anti-American sentiments in the world is the ongoing tragedy in Palestine and undoubtedly, the baseless American occupation of Afghanistan. Even before Obama announced his victory, Israel launched an air strike for no apparent reason, killing six innocent Palestinians. I wonder if Israeli hawks intended to give the message, "The president may change in the US, but it does not matter to us." The truth is, the world community, which holds the US responsible for occupations in Palestine, Iraq and Afghanistan, has difficulty understanding civilian massacres. Especially in Afghanistan, US warplanes carry out air strikes against civilians on a regular basis, killing people indiscriminately.

Obama was elected president by attracting the support of black people and Hispanics, who were weak, excluded and subject to unfair treatment; and the poor, crushed by liberal markets. The wider political and strategic interests and considerations of Afghanistan are a whole different story. I only am referring to civilian massacres committed by US soldiers. Above all, the whole world is expecting Obama to stop these massacres.

07 November 2008, Friday
ALİ BULAÇ
Comments on this article

Begüm Burak , Nov 09 2008 00:00, Sunday
The US foreign policy may show differences but they will not in my opinion, be big differences!
Cem Arda , Nov 07 2008 00:00, Friday
No matter who wins the American general elections, i don't think American foreign policy will ever change, but could cha...

Click to read the details of comments
   
Articles of Today
The ‘genocide’ problem: states, parliaments and people
BERİL DEDEOĞLU
Greek Cypriots blocking Turkey’s judicial reform
ABDULHAMİT BİLİCİ
Opportunity for judicial reform
MÜMTAZER TÜRKÖNE
Who is who?
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
Either the state or a raven’s carcass
MEHMET KAMIŞ
Let it play out for everyone’s sake
ABDULLAH BOZKURT
‘Model partner’ or ‘genocide offender’?
GÜRKAN ZENGİN
Can (Turkish) soccer hooliganism be stopped?
KLAUS JURGENS
A small package but a big step for democracy
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK

Other Articles of the Columnist

  Will the civilian massacres stop?
  Kurdistan in northern Iraq and PKK
  Olmert’s will
  A critical time
  Modern and intimate
  Is non-Western modernization possible?
  A macro outlook on the Kurdish question
  Torture and apology
  Why can’t the Kurdish question be resolved?
  What is the Kurdish issue?
  Civilians and soldiers
  Impressions from the United States
  ‘Religious diversity’ should be an asset
  Religions and modern civilization
  ‘Conflict’ doctrine and EU membership
  How will the religion obstacle be overcome?
  Religion factor
  EU membership and obstacles
  As US vessels set sail to Black Sea
  Global problem
Columnists
ABDULHAMİT BİLİCİ
ABDULLAH BOZKURT
ALİ BULAÇ
ALİ H. ASLAN
AMANDA PAUL
ANDREW FINKEL
ASIM ERDİLEK
AYŞE KARABAT
BEJAN MATUR
BERİL DEDEOĞLU
BERK ÇEKTİR
BÜLENT KENEŞ
BÜLENT KORUCU
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
DOĞU ERGİL
EKREM DUMANLI
EMRE USLU
ETYEN MAHÇUPYAN
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK
FİKRET ERTAN
GÜRKAN ZENGİN
HASAN KANBOLAT
HÜSEYİN GÜLERCE
İBRAHİM KALIN
İBRAHİM ÖZTÜRK
İHSAN DAĞI
İHSAN YILMAZ
KATHY HAMILTON
KERİM BALCI
KLAUS JURGENS
LALE KEMAL
MEHMET KAMIŞ
MICHAEL KUSER
MUHAMMED ÇETİN
MÜMTAZER TÜRKÖNE
NICOLE POPE
ÖMER TAŞPINAR
ORHAN KEMAL CENGİZ
PAT YALE
ŞAHİN ALPAY
SELÇUK GÜLTAŞLI
SUAT KINIKLIOĞLU
YAVUZ BAYDAR