About us | Advertising | Contact | Get Home Delivery | Archive
Mar 21, 2010 Homepage
News
Business
Interviews
Columnists
Op-Ed
Arts & Culture
Expat Zone
Features
Travel
Leisure
Life
Cartoons
Women
Health Briefs
Weird But True
Sports
Turkish Press Review
Today's think tanks
Turkey in Foreign Press

Columnists
İBRAHİM ÖZTÜRK i.ozturk@todayszaman.com Columnists

Recent sources of competitive dynamics in Turkish industry


In my last column I started analyzing the competitive strength of Turkish industries in the recent past. Today I want to continue on the same topic.

Today's interactive toolbox
Bookmark and Share
Video Photo Audio
Send to print Send to my friend
Post your comments
Read comments
Four variables have been found to have critical importance in maintaining the competitiveness of the Turkish manufacturing industry. These are the surge in productivity, keeping wage increases below the productivity level, product differentiation and contribution of cheap imported inputs and the cost of capital.

As measured in terms of these parameters, it can be observed that the auto manufacturing, electrical equipment (consumer durables), industrial machinery and equipment, and chemical and steel production sectors have successfully managed the recent competitive pressures and transformation process. In their good performance, productivity growth, setting wages in line with normal profitability, the capacity to reduce capital and input costs and finally success in differentiating product mix have been critical factors. This success has brought about remarkable output expansion as well as high export and employment performance.

However, there are other sectors that failed to adjust to the environment of increased competition. Among the sunset industries, traditionally low-skilled labor and low-cost local input sectors stand out the most. And among this set, the textiles and apparel industry -- which represents one-third of total manufacturing output and employment - is the most prominent. These sectors failed to increase their productivity, moderate their wages and differentiate their products at a sufficient pace to maintain their competitiveness. It is not surprising, therefore, to see that their output, export and employment performance declined significantly. The most serious negatives in the erosion of their competitive strength are cost factors due to labor intensity, in which China has incomparable advantages.

Other than these two groups, there is a large group of sectors somewhere in the middle on the competitive spectrum. According to the findings, they experienced varying levels of price pressures, productivity and wage growth. Gains on capital and input costs were generally significant but not large enough to neutralize pressures on competitiveness. The manufacture of electronic goods (radio, TV and communications equipment), furniture, plastics and food products are in this category. Their output, export and employment performance generally remained average.

As we can see from the figures below, quality improvements and rising productivity have been the most prominent factors in preserving competitive strength in Turkey. This is quite good news. However, it is also true that the real exchange rate, wages and export prices have not been favorable in the last six years.

Based on these observations, the following sectors are predicted to have competitive power in the future.

Apparel and clothing accessories
Textile yarn and related products
Land vehicles
Iron and steel
Electrical machinery and appliances
Vegetables and fruits


13 August 2008, Wednesday
İBRAHİM ÖZTÜRK
   
Articles of Today
Basic (wrong) instincts
ANDREW FINKEL
Wasted youth
AYŞE KARABAT
Tough days for Obama
AMANDA PAUL
İzmir’s future: urban (re-)development
KLAUS JURGENS
Armenians and our speaking prime minister
İHSAN YILMAZ
How much do we really know?
MICHAEL KUSER
Social and cultural impacts of globalization
DOĞU ERGİL
Impact of Iraqi elections on Kurdish politics
EMRE USLU

Other Articles of the Columnist

  Recent sources of competitive dynamics in Turkish industry
  Toward a new era in competitive dynamics of Turkish industry
  Reconsidering the performance of the Turkish giants
  Interest rate dynamics in Turkey
  Tragedy of Turkey’s rising current account deficit
  Return of the ‘Turkish disease’
  High growth fuels optimism despite external, domestic shocks
  Foreign perspective positive on Turkish economy
  Despite political stalemate, fiscal discipline still on track
  Turkey’s concern must be innovation rather than inflation
  Japan-Turkey relations: Just a fantasy
  ‘A great leap forward’ in the Southeastern Anatolia Project
  The sources of entrepreneurial legitimacy in Turkey
  Tight monetary, expansionary fiscal policy stance?
  Toward a new architecture: an exit scenario from the stabilization program in Turkey
  Managing the change in Turkey: the contribution of the World Bank
  Closing the external gap
  Is Turkey losing control of the current account deficit?
  Future prospects of Turkey’s inflation battle
  Fighting inflation, the slowing economy and exit scenarios for Turkey
Columnists
ABDULHAMİT BİLİCİ
ABDULLAH BOZKURT
ALİ BULAÇ
ALİ H. ASLAN
AMANDA PAUL
ANDREW FINKEL
ASIM ERDİLEK
AYŞE KARABAT
BEJAN MATUR
BERİL DEDEOĞLU
BERK ÇEKTİR
BÜLENT KENEŞ
BÜLENT KORUCU
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
DOĞU ERGİL
EKREM DUMANLI
EMRE USLU
ETYEN MAHÇUPYAN
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK
FİKRET ERTAN
GÜRKAN ZENGİN
HASAN KANBOLAT
HÜSEYİN GÜLERCE
İBRAHİM KALIN
İBRAHİM ÖZTÜRK
İHSAN DAĞI
İHSAN YILMAZ
KATHY HAMILTON
KERİM BALCI
KLAUS JURGENS
LALE KEMAL
MEHMET KAMIŞ
MICHAEL KUSER
MUHAMMED ÇETİN
MÜMTAZER TÜRKÖNE
NICOLE POPE
ÖMER TAŞPINAR
ORHAN KEMAL CENGİZ
PAT YALE
ŞAHİN ALPAY
SELÇUK GÜLTAŞLI
SUAT KINIKLIOĞLU
YAVUZ BAYDAR