About us | Advertising | Contact | Get Home Delivery | Archive
Mar 19, 2010 Homepage
News
Business
Interviews
Columnists
Op-Ed
Arts & Culture
Expat Zone
Features
Travel
Leisure
Life
Cartoons
Women
Health Briefs
Weird But True
Sports
Turkish Press Review
Today's think tanks
Turkey in Foreign Press

Columnists
İBRAHİM KALIN i.kalin@todayszaman.com Columnists

‘Who speaks for Islam?’


This is a question you get all the time when the conversation turns to Islam and the Muslim world. And it is usually followed by another set of questions: What do Muslims think about terrorist attacks?

Today's interactive toolbox
Bookmark and Share
Video Photo Audio
Send to print Send to my friend
Post your comments
Read comments
Do they really believe in democracy and human rights? Are women treated equally in Muslim societies? Can Muslims live in peace with other religions and cultures?

While the question of "who speaks for Islam" is a major theme for scholarly debate, a new book by John Esposito and Dalia Mogahed turns to ordinary Muslims and asks what they think about the issues just mentioned. The book "Who Speaks for Islam: What A Billion Muslims Really Think" (Gallup Press, 2008), which has just been released, is based on Gallup's world poll. Between 2001 and 2007, Gallup surveyed about 50,000 people from 35 nations that are predominantly Muslim or have substantial Muslim populations. This is a huge sampling representing the vast majority of the Muslim world. The authors call them "the silenced majority" of Islam.

Every major finding of the book flies in the face of the commonly held perceptions about Islam and the Muslim world. Here is a summary of the findings: Muslims do not see the West as a monolithic block. They respect certain aspects of Western societies such as science, technology and education. Most of their criticism concentrates on Western policies. They also cite the West's moral decay and loss of traditional values.

These are in conformity with the findings of a survey recently published by the SETA Foundation called "Perceptions of the West in Turkish Society." The book, based on in-depth interviews, asks a number of questions about what is perceived as Western culture, religion, society and politics. One key result is that there is no opposition in Turkey to the West based on religion and culture. All of the major criticisms focus on Western policies. (A summary of the book in English appears in the latest issue of "Insight Turkey" published by SETA; for details, see www.setav.org))

According to "Who Speaks for Islam," a substantial majority of Muslims reject attacks on civilians and terrorism. Among those who condone acts of terrorism feature both religious and non-religious people. Muslim men and women advocate equal rights for women while preserving their religious traditions. While many favor religious law (which in the case of Islam means not only law but also ethical conduct) as a source of legislation, they do not want religious scholars to have a direct role in writing a constitution. What do Muslims want from the West? As the authors of the book put it, they want R.E.S.P.E.C.T, i.e., respect for their cultural and religious traditions.

Given these findings and the current perceptions of Muslims, there is a disturbing disconnection between the two. According to the Gallup surveys, about one-quarter of Americans say that they would not want a Muslim as a neighbor and only less than half believe that American Muslims are loyal to the United States. In a similar way, a 2006 USA Today and Gallup survey found out that 44 percent of Americans believe that Muslims are too extreme in their religious beliefs. I don't think anybody can claim that things are any better in Europe.

Now, finally we have a major study that presents a truthful picture of what people in the Muslim world really think about these critical issues. It is not the self-professed "Islam, terrorism and Middle East expert" (all at the same time!) or the Muslim apologist speaking here. It is the ordinary people, the "silenced majority" that speaks for reason. This is extremely significant not only for correcting the Western perceptions of Islam but also for understanding the underlying beliefs, hopes and aspirations of Muslims across the Islamic world. The study also shows that there is a disconnection between what Muslims want and what they have in their countries.

In contrast to many so-called expert studies of the Muslim world, the book by Esposito and Mogahed does not interpret the absence of democratic institutions in Muslim countries as evidence for the absence of belief in the principles of the rule of law, human rights and democracy. The chapter called "Democracy or Theocracy" (pp. 29-63) provides key findings: "Muslims see no contradiction between democratic values and religious principles." They support a political model where religious principles and democratic values and institutions are combined. In short, the vast majority of Muslims oppose both theocracy and secularism, opting instead for a model of conservative modernity. "Who Speaks for Islam: What a Billion Muslims Really Think" provides ample evidence to go beyond simplistic categories and start an intelligible debate about Islam, Muslims and the West.

27 March 2008, Thursday
İBRAHİM KALIN
   
Articles of Today
All in the family
NICOLE POPE
A new closure case under way?
YAVUZ BAYDAR
Taner Akçam’s letter to the prime minister regarding the Armenian question
ORHAN KEMAL CENGİZ
How many hundreds of thousands of informants are there in Turkey?
HÜSEYİN GÜLERCE
Misled by appearance
ALİ BULAÇ
Saving face
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
The Armenian genocide and disgrace
ETYEN MAHÇUPYAN
Erdoğan’s unwelcome remarks
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK

Other Articles of the Columnist

  ‘Who speaks for Islam?’
  Goal of judicial coup PM Erdoğan, not AK Party
  Getting closer to a solution
  Iraq, violence and the triumph of modernity
  Talking about religion in Turkey
  A hierarchy of freedoms
  Letter from Obama
  Roles shifting in the headscarf debate
  Owning modernity in the Turkish public space
  Is freedom a threat to Turkey?
  Will the Alevi initiative share the destiny of the Kurdish initiative?
  Gül’s visit heralds a new phase in US-Turkish relations
  Turkey’s confidence consolidated in 2007
  Differences are too important to ignore
  A new chapter in Turkish higher education
  The headscarf and secular democracy
  Turkey’s new identities
  How to lose the war on terrorism
  The Middle East peace process comes to Ankara
  Turkey’s resolve and wrong expectations
Columnists
ABDULHAMİT BİLİCİ
ABDULLAH BOZKURT
ALİ BULAÇ
ALİ H. ASLAN
AMANDA PAUL
ANDREW FINKEL
ASIM ERDİLEK
AYŞE KARABAT
BEJAN MATUR
BERİL DEDEOĞLU
BERK ÇEKTİR
BÜLENT KENEŞ
BÜLENT KORUCU
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
DOĞU ERGİL
EKREM DUMANLI
EMRE USLU
ETYEN MAHÇUPYAN
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK
FİKRET ERTAN
GÜRKAN ZENGİN
HASAN KANBOLAT
HÜSEYİN GÜLERCE
İBRAHİM KALIN
İBRAHİM ÖZTÜRK
İHSAN DAĞI
İHSAN YILMAZ
KATHY HAMILTON
KERİM BALCI
KLAUS JURGENS
LALE KEMAL
MEHMET KAMIŞ
MICHAEL KUSER
MUHAMMED ÇETİN
MÜMTAZER TÜRKÖNE
NICOLE POPE
ÖMER TAŞPINAR
ORHAN KEMAL CENGİZ
PAT YALE
ŞAHİN ALPAY
SELÇUK GÜLTAŞLI
SUAT KINIKLIOĞLU
YAVUZ BAYDAR