About us | Advertising | Contact | Get Home Delivery | Archive
Mar 19, 2010 Homepage
News
Business
Interviews
Columnists
Op-Ed
Arts & Culture
Expat Zone
Features
Travel
Leisure
Life
Cartoons
Women
Health Briefs
Weird But True
Sports
Turkish Press Review
Today's think tanks
Turkey in Foreign Press

Columnists
LALE KEMAL loglu@todayszaman.com Diplomacy

The real message of the Turkish operation


It would not be wrong to say that early on Sunday morning Turkey conducted its biggest operation to date, both in terms of quantity and quality, against outlawed Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) terrorists in northern Iraq.

Today's interactive toolbox
Bookmark and Share
Video Photo Audio
Send to print Send to my friend
Post your comments
Read comments

Turkish forces have conducted around 24 operations against the PKK between 1983 and 1999 before the US invasion of Iraq in 2003, which changed the equation with regards to Turkey's neighbor.

In none of these previous operations have we, the Turks, had any information concerning a cost-benefit analysis.

We may not have one on the current operation either. But one thing is sure -- the difference of the latest operation from previous ones since the US has been supplying real-time intelligence, i.e., cooperation with Turkey, in the fight against the PKK and this cooperation has been endorsed not only by bureaucrats but by US President George W. Bush.

Many of Turkey's previous operations were conducted under a hot pursuit agreement between Turkey and Iraq, even after the first Gulf War of 1991, when northern Iraq came under the protection of the US-led forces operating from Turkey's İncirlik base.

In other words, those past operations, sometimes in cooperation with the Iraqi Kurds and sometimes while informing the US side to avoid possible friendly fire incidents, have been conducted within the legal context of the hot pursuit agreement, despite the fact that European countries in particular and the world public in general did not approve of Turkish incursions into its neighbor.

Though the current US real-time intelligence supplied to Turkey has never matched the previous intelligence given to Ankara on and off in the early 1990s, there is a previous record of Turkish-US cooperation on Turkey's incursions into northern Iraq. But as I wrote in one of my previous columns, intelligence support to Turkey was cut off by the US in the late 1990s, when Turkey allegedly engaged in grave human rights violations in northern Iraq.

We could then argue that the latest Turkish operation taking place after many years differs from the previous ones in many respects. Unlike the previous operations, the latest Turkish incursion is being conducted for the first time with fighters equipped with US-made Low Altitude Navigation and Targeting Infrared for Night (LANTIRN) night vision systems, which have enabled Turkish pilots to spot the right targets -- established by using the US real-time intelligence -- and to drop the bombs on the right places.

According to my information, not 50 as reported by the press, but around 10 to 13 F-16 fighters equipped with LANTIRN night vision systems participated in the night operations. More importantly, according to military sources, the US intelligence on the PKK hideouts played a crucial role in the operation.

We will know, perhaps later, the level of success of the operations by looking at whether the PKK threat has been minimized. But in my opinion one of the major messages that came out of the latest operation is that Turkey and the US have been working together against the PKK, which both defined as a common enemy after several years of US indifference to its close ally's PKK problem.

Have the Iraqi Kurds or the Iraqi central government approved this operation? My answer is no, but at least we could say that with the US pressure, they both have at least remained neutral.

The second key message that this operation should have sent is one for the PKK -- Turkey in a joint effort with the US can drop bombs on the terrorist camps. Lastly it has given the message to the Turkish public -- the majority of who were unfortunately prepared for an incursion as if it alone could be a solution to the PKK problem -- that Turkey can carry out an operation.

One of the biggest tasks at the moment is to prevent any possible conflict between Turkish forces and the PKK in northern Iraq following the operation. As long as Turkish-US cooperation in the fight against the KK continues, such a conflict is not expected to occur.

Now the big question is whether the Turkish government, which has so far successfully conducted crisis management through diplomatic channels, will be able to introduce a package that will involve partial amnesty for PKK members as well as offering the economic, social and political measures necessary for the region. Any operation falling short of any of these aspects will not succeed.

 

18 December 2007, Tuesday
LALE KEMAL
   
Articles of Today
All in the family
NICOLE POPE
A new closure case under way?
YAVUZ BAYDAR
Taner Akçam’s letter to the prime minister regarding the Armenian question
ORHAN KEMAL CENGİZ
How many hundreds of thousands of informants are there in Turkey?
HÜSEYİN GÜLERCE
Misled by appearance
ALİ BULAÇ
Saving face
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
The Armenian genocide and disgrace
ETYEN MAHÇUPYAN
Erdoğan’s unwelcome remarks
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK

Other Articles of the Columnist

  The real message of the Turkish operation
  Isolated analysis does not make sense
  Fresh but once again controversial amnesty attempt
  Who will oversee the military companies -- and how?
  Deceiving the public on arms purchases
  ‘You scratch my back and I’ll scratch yours’
  Turkey’s improved image contributes to better ties with Italy, too
  Turkey starts learning energy game
  Alarm bells ring on Turkey’s doorstep
  Tragicomic phenomena: Putting the blame on others
  Does the Turkish Parliament come from a different planet?
  When will the US halt actionable intelligence?
  US seeks Turkish policy change on Iran
  Turkey’s critical dance with democracy
  Psychological warfare may pave way for cool-headed decisions
  Turkey’s dangerous dance with isolationism
  Turkish dilemma: Lack of good governance
  Turkey has again trapped in cross border option
  State authority and Turkish Hizbullah
  Southeast: Economy versus security?
Columnists
ABDULHAMİT BİLİCİ
ABDULLAH BOZKURT
ALİ BULAÇ
ALİ H. ASLAN
AMANDA PAUL
ANDREW FINKEL
ASIM ERDİLEK
AYŞE KARABAT
BEJAN MATUR
BERİL DEDEOĞLU
BERK ÇEKTİR
BÜLENT KENEŞ
BÜLENT KORUCU
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
DOĞU ERGİL
EKREM DUMANLI
EMRE USLU
ETYEN MAHÇUPYAN
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK
FİKRET ERTAN
GÜRKAN ZENGİN
HASAN KANBOLAT
HÜSEYİN GÜLERCE
İBRAHİM KALIN
İBRAHİM ÖZTÜRK
İHSAN DAĞI
İHSAN YILMAZ
KATHY HAMILTON
KERİM BALCI
KLAUS JURGENS
LALE KEMAL
MEHMET KAMIŞ
MICHAEL KUSER
MUHAMMED ÇETİN
MÜMTAZER TÜRKÖNE
NICOLE POPE
ÖMER TAŞPINAR
ORHAN KEMAL CENGİZ
PAT YALE
ŞAHİN ALPAY
SELÇUK GÜLTAŞLI
SUAT KINIKLIOĞLU
YAVUZ BAYDAR