About us | Advertising | Contact | Get Home Delivery | Archive
Mar 22, 2010 Homepage
News
Business
Interviews
Columnists
Op-Ed
Arts & Culture
Expat Zone
Features
Travel
Leisure
Life
Cartoons
Women
Health Briefs
Weird But True
Sports
Turkish Press Review
Today's think tanks
Turkey in Foreign Press

Columnists
HÜSEYİN GÜLERCE h.gulerce@todayszaman.com Columnists

Will those who don’t wear the headscarf be subject to persecution?


A new debate was sparked in Turkey after it became evident that the new draft constitution would include a provision to abolish the headscarf ban.

Today's interactive toolbox
Bookmark and Share
Video Photo Audio
Send to print Send to my friend
Post your comments
Read comments
However, a number of public surveys have shown that a clear majority, 70 percent, agree that wearing a headscarf is not contrary to secularism. The meaning of these surveys is obvious -- society does not have any problem with the headscarf. There are certain circles that try to incite polarization and tension based on an artificial headscarf issue. Part of the problem also concerns the Justice and Development Party (AK Party). Some assert that the number of women who wear a headscarf is on the rise because the AK Party administration promotes and encourages wearing it. The need for some form of revenge is becoming stronger; this is based on hatred. Recently, a girl with a headscarf was seen selling a communist journal in Istanbul. Her eyes reflected hatred.

So who does this girl hate? Given the paper in her hands, we might say she hates the “dominant classes,” the “bourgeoisies.” If we consider her headscarf, we might say that she hates the “secularists.”

“The number of people with the headscarf is on the rise in the environment created by the AK Party.”

Is it right to reach such a solid sociological conclusion based on a single photo? Why would an aware Muslim embrace an outdated ideology instead of making efforts for the betterment of other people? What if this was a plot? Isn’t it normal to make up stories in the holy month of Ramadan based on false reports, alleging that somebody was beaten because he was not fasting? Isn’t it this kind of approach that actually incites hatred and provokes division in society? Every belief and faith has its radicals. But the rational majority is what should be considered. The rational majority of Turkey does not endorse politics over religion; but it also disagrees with those who oppose religion.

Now there is another popular assertion on the abolition of the headscarf ban -- that those who do not wear a headscarf will be subjected to increasing pressure and threats because of the justifying effect of the new constitution.

Is there anything graver than this for one who wears a headscarf because of her religious beliefs? Doesn’t this mean that the religious people who defend tolerance and respect for others’ choices are negating their stance? Will they ever be able to be convincing if they resort to this sort of action? Yes, there might be some who hold such concerns. They may assert that nobody knows where Turkey is heading. This is simply because our country is currently suffering from a loss of faith and confidence. This is a prevalent problem in families, business life, on the streets and even in state institutions. For this reason, keeping records on individuals is still commonplace in this country.

This lack of confidence sometimes turns into paranoia. We simply turn our lives into a living hell. Turkey’s rational majority is the primary assurance for this country. The majority which embraces the true and core premises of religion and is tolerant of all beliefs is the assurance of domestic peace in this country. We will either have trust and confidence in each other or will seek to inflict harm on each other based on assumptions and paranoia. Promotion of democracy fortified by the rule of law and freedom is the only way to maintain our confidence. A simple question for all of us to ask ourselves is, are we really democratic?

07 December 2007, Friday
HÜSEYİN GÜLERCE
   
Articles of Today
The ‘Armenian problem,’ intellectuals and politicians in Turkey
ŞAHİN ALPAY
Process (mis) management
YAVUZ BAYDAR
It’s good to know you’re in good hands
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
Can the AK Party change the Constitution?
İHSAN DAĞI
How to go for growth in Turkey
ASIM ERDİLEK
From zero problems to zero progress
ÖMER TAŞPINAR
Fraudulent activity regarding deeds -- Bodrum and other cities (1)
BERK ÇEKTİR
Reasons behind Erdoğan’s controversial statement
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK

Other Articles of the Columnist

  Will those who don’t wear the headscarf be subject to persecution?
  ‘Let trucks -- not tanks -- come’
  ‘They even photographed my head!’
  Gülen’s new step for the Southeast
  Don’t listen to the man with the pincers
  New constitution and the Abant spirit
  Hands unite in our hands
  Turkish schools in northern Iraq
  301: Resistance to democracy
  We didn’t fall into the trap
  What will the result of the summit be?
  Gülen conference in London
  Terrorism, military and government
  Motion passes, but…
  Question on terrorism: What is going on?
  The gallant voice of the new Turkey
  An iftar dinner in New York
  New Turks have something new to offer
  Neighborhoods are afraid of urban transformation
  İftars: How many people are expecting us...
Columnists
ABDULHAMİT BİLİCİ
ABDULLAH BOZKURT
ALİ BULAÇ
ALİ H. ASLAN
AMANDA PAUL
ANDREW FINKEL
ASIM ERDİLEK
AYŞE KARABAT
BEJAN MATUR
BERİL DEDEOĞLU
BERK ÇEKTİR
BÜLENT KENEŞ
BÜLENT KORUCU
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
DOĞU ERGİL
EKREM DUMANLI
EMRE USLU
ETYEN MAHÇUPYAN
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK
FİKRET ERTAN
GÜRKAN ZENGİN
HASAN KANBOLAT
HÜSEYİN GÜLERCE
İBRAHİM KALIN
İBRAHİM ÖZTÜRK
İHSAN DAĞI
İHSAN YILMAZ
KATHY HAMILTON
KERİM BALCI
KLAUS JURGENS
LALE KEMAL
MEHMET KAMIŞ
MICHAEL KUSER
MUHAMMED ÇETİN
MÜMTAZER TÜRKÖNE
NICOLE POPE
ÖMER TAŞPINAR
ORHAN KEMAL CENGİZ
PAT YALE
ŞAHİN ALPAY
SELÇUK GÜLTAŞLI
SUAT KINIKLIOĞLU
YAVUZ BAYDAR