About us | Advertising | Contact | Get Home Delivery | Archive
Mar 20, 2010 Homepage
News
Business
Interviews
Columnists
Op-Ed
Arts & Culture
Expat Zone
Features
Travel
Leisure
Life
Cartoons
Women
Health Briefs
Weird But True
Sports
Turkish Press Review
Today's think tanks
Turkey in Foreign Press

Columnists
BÜLENT KENEŞ b.kenes@todayszaman.com National

Kurdish deputies, risks and opportunities


The July 22 elections turned out to be a platform where our citizens of Kurdish descent gained the right of representation, according to their own politicized rhetoric, having come to be -- willingly or unwillingly -- associated with the outlawed Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) after being expelled from Turkish Parliament in 1993 as a result of a process that had been triggered in 1991 when they attempted to use the Kurdish language during the oath-taking ceremony upon entering Parliament.

Today's interactive toolbox
Bookmark and Share
Video Photo Audio
Send to print Send to my friend
Post your comments
Read comments
 With the help of the elections, pro-Kurdish deputies have managed to enter Parliament after 14 years.

Although an important portion of our Kurdish citizens have had the chance to be represented through Kurdish candidates nominated by other parties in all Parliaments since the expulsion and imprisonment in 1993 of Democracy Party (DEP) deputies, which was a great mistake according to me, the segment of our Kurdish citizens that came under the influence of the PKK obtained a genuine chance on July 22 for real representation with their expectations and wishes through the 22 independent DTP deputies who come right from the midst of the Kurdish problem.

I should immediately note that the re-entry of the deputies of Kurdish origin to Parliament offers very important opportunities as well as exposing some inherent risks. Above all, in the event proper working conditions and grounds for reconciliation are generated through these deputies, who are the most competent experts on the reasons for the sympathy of the eastern and southeastern regions for the PKK -- regions where Kurdish citizens are the majority -- we can cover a serious distance in terms of finishing off the terrorist group politically and divesting it of public support.

Of course, the first and foremost condition of generating proper working conditions is that these Kurdish deputies, who are currently independent but who will soon reunify under the roof of the DTP, must prove to be courageous enough to draw a very broad line between themselves and the terrorist group. It should be our most natural right to expect an attitude with which the independent DTP deputies, who are now a movement with a right to democratic representation in Parliament, should oppose, condemn and sideline the bloody terrorism of the PKK.

Without a doubt, the DTP deputies will be a part of a solution to the extent they are able to keep clear of the PKK’s actions and statements. Given the realities of the regions they come from, the greatest risk awaiting the DTP deputies, who share the same social base with the PKK, is the possibility that they might not have the courage to achieve the much-anticipated separation from the PKK. If they function as spokespeople of the bloody PKK in lieu of acting with the responsibility of deputies elected through democratic methods, they will become the malicious means of an ever-deepening problem, let alone being a part of any solution.

Alongs with the 22 independent DTP deputies, the deputies of Kurdish descent of the AK Party, who have a higher level of representation in the region, can also play a major role in forming a conciliatory ground by assuming a role of functional mediation. The democratic maturity expected of the AK Party, which will be the government and had a majority in the Parliament, will be the greatest opportunity for the DTP deputies in the new term. Benefiting from or wasting this opportunity will be determined by the DTP deputies’ attitude toward the PKK. Although it seems rather improbable that the DTP will show the maturity expected of the AK Party, I want to hope that they will at least endeavor to this end.

In addition, the fact that the independents of the DTP will come together with the nationalist MHP deputies under the same roof presents important opportunities along with the great risks it exposes. The attitude of the MHP deputies toward the independents of the DTP will be a determining factor as important as the attitude of the DTP toward the PKK. I can say this much at this stage: Parliament could well become a battlefield of ethnic-based nationalist mottos or, in contrast, a huge field of conciliation where the rigidity of these mottos might be curtailed to a significant degree.

The first possibility contains massive dangers, such as the terrorization of Parliament by the DTP and MHP deputies, causing it to stop functioning properly, while the second possibility offers an ointment to Turkey’s wound of terrorism and separatism, bleeding for a quarter century. Given the general principle that the most lasting conciliations and peace treaties are the ones between hawks, I hope that the independents of the DTP and the MHP deputies opt for the second path, which is the one in favor of our country and our nation.

I also hope that the attitude of the CHP -- which has been almost thoroughly blotted out from the East and Southeast, thereby becoming a regional party of the West -- toward the DTP will be different from their traditional status quo stance. At this point, I want to think that the CHP is intelligent enough to discern that their chances of becoming a national party again are directly related to their decision on whether to try to work with the DTP deputies or to clash with them.

The new Parliament, as I have pointed out, both exposes great risks and presents important opportunities. The decision and its concomitant responsibility are to be shouldered first by the deputies in Parliament and then by all of us.

30 July 2007, Monday
BÜLENT KENEŞ
   
Articles of Today
The ‘genocide’ problem: states, parliaments and people
BERİL DEDEOĞLU
Greek Cypriots blocking Turkey’s judicial reform
ABDULHAMİT BİLİCİ
Opportunity for judicial reform
MÜMTAZER TÜRKÖNE
Who is who?
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
Either the state or a raven’s carcass
MEHMET KAMIŞ
Let it play out for everyone’s sake
ABDULLAH BOZKURT
‘Model partner’ or ‘genocide offender’?
GÜRKAN ZENGİN
Can (Turkish) soccer hooliganism be stopped?
KLAUS JURGENS
A small package but a big step for democracy
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK

Other Articles of the Columnist

  Kurdish deputies, risks and opportunities
  Aliens among us
  What message did voters send and to whom?
  Winners and losers of July 22
  What sort of Turkey do I dream of for July 23?
  Turkey’s political sedimentation
  Today’s Zaman before historic elections
  A president like Sezer!
  Turkey and the Fourth World
  Separatism with a discourse on unity
  Who will people vote for? What will determine their decision?
  Unfair taxation on gas and politics over diesel
  CHP’s betrayal of democracy at certification phase
  Rising neo-nationalism and xenophobia
  What are the AK Party and the CHP promising in foreign policy?
  Minority test for parties
  Toward a new era in Palestine
  Hudson, ASELSAN and parliamentary review
  Brainstorming with our generals on how to sink Turkey
  Where on our agenda is global warming?
Columnists
ABDULHAMİT BİLİCİ
ABDULLAH BOZKURT
ALİ BULAÇ
ALİ H. ASLAN
AMANDA PAUL
ANDREW FINKEL
ASIM ERDİLEK
AYŞE KARABAT
BEJAN MATUR
BERİL DEDEOĞLU
BERK ÇEKTİR
BÜLENT KENEŞ
BÜLENT KORUCU
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
DOĞU ERGİL
EKREM DUMANLI
EMRE USLU
ETYEN MAHÇUPYAN
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK
FİKRET ERTAN
GÜRKAN ZENGİN
HASAN KANBOLAT
HÜSEYİN GÜLERCE
İBRAHİM KALIN
İBRAHİM ÖZTÜRK
İHSAN DAĞI
İHSAN YILMAZ
KATHY HAMILTON
KERİM BALCI
KLAUS JURGENS
LALE KEMAL
MEHMET KAMIŞ
MICHAEL KUSER
MUHAMMED ÇETİN
MÜMTAZER TÜRKÖNE
NICOLE POPE
ÖMER TAŞPINAR
ORHAN KEMAL CENGİZ
PAT YALE
ŞAHİN ALPAY
SELÇUK GÜLTAŞLI
SUAT KINIKLIOĞLU
YAVUZ BAYDAR