About us | Advertising | Contact | Get Home Delivery | Archive
Mar 19, 2010 Homepage
News
Business
Interviews
Columnists
Op-Ed
Arts & Culture
Expat Zone
Features
Travel
Leisure
Life
Cartoons
Women
Health Briefs
Weird But True
Sports
Turkish Press Review
Today's think tanks
Turkey in Foreign Press

Columnists
İHSAN DAĞI i.dagi@todayszaman.com Columnists

Coup allegations: why is the military silent?


Since Nokta’s revelations last week, the Turkish media have been debating two coup attempts back in 2004.  Despite the allegations there is a strange silence on the part of the military, the institution whose highest-raking commanders are accused of plotting to overthrow the civilian government.

Today's interactive toolbox
Bookmark and Share
Video Photo Audio
Send to print Send to my friend
Post your comments
Read comments
 It is unusual because we are accustomed to reading the military’s public statements over comparatively insignificant issues, let alone coup allegations.

Why are they so silent this time?

One explanation is that the diary supposedly written by Adm. Örnek is authentic. It means that a junta within the military really attempted to stage coup twice in 2004. A journalist in Ankara, Aslı Aydıntaşbaş, who is close to military sources, wrote last week in the Sabah daily that the diary is being treated as authentic in Ankara circles. The personal impression of the journalist from her contacts with high ranking commanders, who do not rule out the authenticity of the diary, is affirmative too. The silence may therefore be interpreted as an acknowledgment of the truth of the content of the diary.  

The second explanation is that, true or false, the military is purposively refraining from denouncing this diary and the engagement of its top commanders in a coup. Behind the silence of the military there is an implicit message that such a line of action is possible, and is even being contemplated nowadays. The silence therefore is designed as a strategy to put pressure on the presidential election process, implying that the military keeps all options, including a coup, open.

  Authentic or used as an opportunity to send threatening messages to the government, both are unacceptable in a democracy.

In any case I cannot help but remember the strategy revealed in Admiral Örnek’s diary to add some social clothing to the attempted coups, which may explain some current developments.

Organize civil society: on April 14 the ADD (the Kemalist Thought Association) headed by a retired general, Şener Eruygur, who was the lead man in the 2004 coup attempts, is organizing a mass rally in Ankara that will certainly be used as an occasion to call on the “dynamic forces” to move in.

Mobilize the universities: universities seem actively involved in the ADD rally by postponing examinations and providing free transportation to Ankara. The Rectors Committee, an unconstitutional entity headed by a professor of constitutional law, issued a declaration last week explaining extra-constitutional conditions for presidential candidates. The declaration resembled the “fatwa” issued by the professors of law in 1960 to justify the bloody 1960 military coup leading to the execution of Prime Minister Menderes and two of his ministers.

Mobilize the like-minded media. Even in the mainstream media there is no shortage of journalists and columnist who are calling on the military to do something to stop PM Erdoğan or anyone from the AK Party from becoming president.

So, the strategy of staging a coup may well be in play at the moment too.

Should we take these possibilities seriously? Yes, indeed. I am pretty sure that those anti-globalization forces are determined to do whatever they are capable of to take Turkey away from integrating with the world so that they can establish a fascistic regime in this country isolated from the world. The last chance they have is to exploit the presidential elections to incite a coup.

Democratic vigilance is needed, which requires an investigation into the uncovered activities. The matter is now being investigated by the chief public prosecutor in Ankara, who will send the file to the chief of general staff and ask for his approval to open the case. You can guess what will happen next. The chief of general staff will reply that these are rumors warranting no investigation. How can we defend and consolidate democracy if an attempt at overthrowing the civilian government cannot be legally investigated. If the coup makers are successful, they make the law. If they fail, the civilians cannot dare to investigate the matter. Thus, militarism is the winner in any case.    

There is at least one option at hand. I will repeat myself: it is to set up a parliamentary commission comprising all the political parties within the parliament to investigate the attempted coup. This is a must as well as an opportunity to consolidate democracy and correct once and for all civilian supremacy over the military. Since any coup is directed at the notion of the supremacy of the national will and its embodiment, the parliament, it should be the parliament that should take the matter into its hands. Otherwise those adventurists in the military with political ambitions will always find the courage to turn their arms against the will of the nation.

09 April 2007, Monday
İHSAN DAĞI
   
Articles of Today
All in the family
NICOLE POPE
A new closure case under way?
YAVUZ BAYDAR
Taner Akçam’s letter to the prime minister regarding the Armenian question
ORHAN KEMAL CENGİZ
How many hundreds of thousands of informants are there in Turkey?
HÜSEYİN GÜLERCE
Misled by appearance
ALİ BULAÇ
Saving face
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
The Armenian genocide and disgrace
ETYEN MAHÇUPYAN
Erdoğan’s unwelcome remarks
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK

Other Articles of the Columnist

  Coup allegations: why is the military silent?
  Will the EU suspend negotiations with Turkey over coup talks?
  Does the European Court of Human Rights need a liberal judge?
  Prospects for peace in Europe, and Turkey’s role
  European Union as a peace project
  Mind the Copenhagen Criteria
  If not Erdoğan, who?
  ‘Pro-Western Kemalists’: A Western illusion
  Who is not profiled by the military?
  Is the AK Party pro-Western?
  February 28 and the transformation of the Islamic political identity
  The ‘fear factor’: A shortcut to undemocratic rule
  Rethinking ‘Islam and the West’
  Taking the ‘clash of civilizations’ seriously
  Gül, Büyükanıt and the Unıted States
  Is civic nationalism a possibility?
  Rule by fear
  Democratization and anti-Americanism: any relation?
  Anti-Americanism, nationalism and the US Congress
  Time to integrate the Kurdish movement into national politics
Columnists
ABDULHAMİT BİLİCİ
ABDULLAH BOZKURT
ALİ BULAÇ
ALİ H. ASLAN
AMANDA PAUL
ANDREW FINKEL
ASIM ERDİLEK
AYŞE KARABAT
BEJAN MATUR
BERİL DEDEOĞLU
BERK ÇEKTİR
BÜLENT KENEŞ
BÜLENT KORUCU
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
DOĞU ERGİL
EKREM DUMANLI
EMRE USLU
ETYEN MAHÇUPYAN
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK
FİKRET ERTAN
GÜRKAN ZENGİN
HASAN KANBOLAT
HÜSEYİN GÜLERCE
İBRAHİM KALIN
İBRAHİM ÖZTÜRK
İHSAN DAĞI
İHSAN YILMAZ
KATHY HAMILTON
KERİM BALCI
KLAUS JURGENS
LALE KEMAL
MEHMET KAMIŞ
MICHAEL KUSER
MUHAMMED ÇETİN
MÜMTAZER TÜRKÖNE
NICOLE POPE
ÖMER TAŞPINAR
ORHAN KEMAL CENGİZ
PAT YALE
ŞAHİN ALPAY
SELÇUK GÜLTAŞLI
SUAT KINIKLIOĞLU
YAVUZ BAYDAR