About us | Advertising | Contact | Get Home Delivery | Archive
Mar 22, 2010 Homepage
News
Business
Interviews
Columnists
Op-Ed
Arts & Culture
Expat Zone
Features
Travel
Leisure
Life
Cartoons
Women
Health Briefs
Weird But True
Sports
Turkish Press Review
Today's think tanks
Turkey in Foreign Press

Columnists
DOĞU ERGİL d.ergil@todayszaman.com Columnists

Problems of nationalism


Turkey is at a crossroads. It will dilute and contain an increasingly aggressive wave of nationalism, or this surge will invade the streets and end up with a quasi-fascistic political atmosphere that will throw Turkey off balance.

Today's interactive toolbox
Bookmark and Share
Video Photo Audio
Send to print Send to my friend
Post your comments
Read comments
What are the origins of Turkish nationalism? For sure nationalism in the Turkish context is a creature of the state. When the multi-national empire collapsed and its state elite founded the republic, they had all the instruments of statecraft in their toolbox. What they missed was the nation. They set out to forge a nation out of the mixed horde of people they inherited from a past that was no more.

The founders of the republic were Ottoman soldiers, bureaucrats and middle-class intelligentsia. They had played important roles in the last two decades of the empire that collapsed over their heads. Yet, they blamed the failure on two culprits: the imperialist Western countries that were then called Allies (as opposed to the Axis powers where the last Ottoman government dragged the country into); and non-Turkish peoples of the empire that rebelled to have their own nation-states.

When the republic was declared the founders of the national state were keen on creating a homogeneous society to avoid “treason” and to never allow foreign intervention again. The national anthem adopted unanimously by the Parliament on 12th of March 1921 reflects these national concerns. In the first verse the lines read:

“Fear not, the crimson flag, waving in these dawns will never fade

Before the last hearth that is burning in my nation vanishes.|In the sixth verse, it reads:

|Fear not, you are great! How a dragon with one remaining tooth Called ‘Civilization,’ could drown such faith?|

The fear of extinction is obvious but what is interesting is the way the West is portrayed: not a civilization but in fact an aggressive beast that relies on one thing, its military power (one tooth). It is devoid of the humanity and moral superiority that are the sources of the Turks’ greatness. The Turk’s faith in his greatness is his power.

Today, the fear and the myth are back. Many Turks believe that their country is under siege and the same imperialist powers are here to dismantle the country by instigating non-Turkish minorities like the Kurds and Christians. Now we have to draw on our greatness once again. How we came to this point is the subject matter of another article.

One thing must be emphasized, though. The depiction of the nation is in school books and the statements of the founders. Officially the nation reflects political, linguistic, racial and ethnic (they called this “origin”) unity and historical and moral similarity. Given this description, a nation designed as such could either be built by eliminating or suppressing differences. This meant ousting of the idea of reconciling differences and rejecting the reality of ethnic, linguistic and cultural plurality. Hence democracy would not be among the instruments in forging the nation. That is why “democracy” does not exist in the six arrow emblem of the Republican People’s Party whose political philosophy dominated statecraft until 1950. The existing arrows or principles were statism, nationalism, reformism, laicism, populism and republicanism.

Of these, statism is of particular importance because the state preceded the nation and invested in itself the right and authority to shape the nation like a plastic entity without a sociological, historical and cultural character. This hierarchical relationship between state and society overpowered the former and disempowered the latter, rendering society totally dependent on the state, not only for its security but also for its livelihood.

Socio-economic development on the one hand and globalization (put EU membership in this category) on the other brought enormous pressure to bear on this format. The challenge for the ruling cadres of Turkey is obvious: either go along with the tide of the times or cling onto the existing institutional structure and legal system that upholds it and become a pariah of the modern world. Somewhere along the way, it is hoped that the people are heard too. Fortunately there are elections ahead and maybe the people may have a chance to express themselves.

02 March 2007, Friday
DOĞU ERGİL
   
Articles of Today
The ‘Armenian problem,’ intellectuals and politicians in Turkey
ŞAHİN ALPAY
Process (mis) management
YAVUZ BAYDAR
It’s good to know you’re in good hands
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
Can the AK Party change the Constitution?
İHSAN DAĞI
How to go for growth in Turkey
ASIM ERDİLEK
From zero problems to zero progress
ÖMER TAŞPINAR
Fraudulent activity regarding deeds -- Bodrum and other cities (1)
BERK ÇEKTİR
Reasons behind Erdoğan’s controversial statement
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK

Other Articles of the Columnist

  Problems of nationalism
Columnists
ABDULHAMİT BİLİCİ
ABDULLAH BOZKURT
ALİ BULAÇ
ALİ H. ASLAN
AMANDA PAUL
ANDREW FINKEL
ASIM ERDİLEK
AYŞE KARABAT
BEJAN MATUR
BERİL DEDEOĞLU
BERK ÇEKTİR
BÜLENT KENEŞ
BÜLENT KORUCU
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
DOĞU ERGİL
EKREM DUMANLI
EMRE USLU
ETYEN MAHÇUPYAN
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK
FİKRET ERTAN
GÜRKAN ZENGİN
HASAN KANBOLAT
HÜSEYİN GÜLERCE
İBRAHİM KALIN
İBRAHİM ÖZTÜRK
İHSAN DAĞI
İHSAN YILMAZ
KATHY HAMILTON
KERİM BALCI
KLAUS JURGENS
LALE KEMAL
MEHMET KAMIŞ
MICHAEL KUSER
MUHAMMED ÇETİN
MÜMTAZER TÜRKÖNE
NICOLE POPE
ÖMER TAŞPINAR
ORHAN KEMAL CENGİZ
PAT YALE
ŞAHİN ALPAY
SELÇUK GÜLTAŞLI
SUAT KINIKLIOĞLU
YAVUZ BAYDAR