“With time, some of the necessary information may deteriorate or be lost entirely,” the IAEA chief Yukiya Amano wrote in a confidential report obtained by Reuters. US intelligence reports have said the site, known as either al-Kibar or Dair Alzour, was a nascent North Korean-designed nuclear reactor to produce bomb fuel.
Earlier this year the IAEA gave some weight to suspicions of illicit atomic activity at the site by saying that uranium traces found in a 2008 visit by inspectors pointed to nuclear-related activity.
“The features of the building and its connectivity to adequate cooling are similar to what may be found at a nuclear site,” the latest report said.
The agency wants to re-examine the site so it can take samples from rubble removed immediately after the air strike.
Amano urged Syria to cooperate and criticized it for failing to provide documents related to Dair Alzour and making only statements “limited in detail” about it. He also repeated a call for IAEA access to three other Syrian sites under military control whose appearance was altered by landscaping after inspectors asked for access.
Washington’s envoy to the IAEA said last month a “number of countries” were beginning to ask whether it was time to invoke the IAEA’s “special inspection” mechanism to give it the authority to look anywhere necessary in Syria at short notice. A leading Washington-based think tank said on Monday that the time was ripe for the IAEA to make such a move with the backing of its 35-nation board of governors. “A special inspection is necessary in order to gain a better understanding of Syria’s undeclared activities, some of which may continue,” the Institute for Science and International Security said.
“The sooner a special inspection takes place, the fewer opportunities Syria will have to cover up evidence about the project.”
The agency last resorted to special inspection powers in 1993 in North Korea, which still withheld access and later developed nuclear bomb capacity in secret. The IAEA lacks legal means to get Syria to open up because the country’s basic safeguards treaty with the UN nuclear watchdog covers only its one declared atomic facility, an old research reactor.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| BÜLENT KENEŞ | ![]() |
||
| What befell Niyazi-i Misri in the past is happening to Fethullah Gülen now | |||
| EKREM DUMANLI | ![]() |
||
| When a call for fairness and reason finds acceptance | |||
| ŞAHİN ALPAY | ![]() |
||
| Uludere, test case for democracy in Turkey | |||
| EMRE USLU | ![]() |
||
| Are the Kurds mentally divorced from Turkey? | |||
| GÖKHAN BACIK | ![]() |
||
| Erdoğan, Gül and Davutoğlu: the inner bargain on Turkish foreign policy | |||
| MARKAR ESAYAN | ![]() |
||
| Taking lessons from previous experiences with the military | |||
| YAVUZ BAYDAR | ![]() |
||
| Qualm | |||
| ÖMER TAŞPINAR | ![]() |
||
| A new phase in Syria? | |||
| İHSAN DAĞI | ![]() |
||
| Turkish foreign policy: Time for a re-evaluation | |||
| SEYFETTİN GÜRSEL | ![]() |
||
| Poor-friendly economic growth and the AK Party | |||
| CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON | ![]() |
||
| Missing women, missing opportunities | |||
| BERK ÇEKTİR | ![]() |
||
| Changes to incentives for investment in Turkey | |||
| MERVE BÜŞRA ÖZTÜRK | ![]() |
||
| The 1960 coup: a final test for democracy | |||
| AMANDA PAUL | ![]() |
||
| Ukraine: a lost country | |||
| MÜMTAZER TÜRKÖNE | ![]() |
||
| The 52nd anniversary of May 27 | |||
|
|
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||