Kyrgyzstan’s new window of opportunity
by
Kelima Yakupova*

Kyrgyzstan, a majority-Muslim, Central Asian republic, has endured two coups d'état in the last five years. The first, the Tulip Revolution in March 2005, led to the downfall of the country's first post-Soviet president, Askar Akayev, whose 15 years in power ended amidst charges of corruption, nepotism and cronyism, and brought Bakiyev to power.

During the past several years, Bakiyev took the regime in an increasingly authoritarian direction, and on April 7, Scarlet Revolution protesters in Bishkek and several other cities rose up to drive yet another head of state from power.

Though lasting change eluded Kyrgyzstan in 2005, the Kyrgyz people now have an opportunity to ensure that history does not repeat itself.

The head of the interim government, Otunbayeva, has been active in Kyrgyz politics since 1981, serving as the USSR's emissary to the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) and ambassador to Malaysia, the United Kingdom and the United States. In keeping with their promises to restore democracy in Kyrgyzstan, the three major opposition parties have reached a consensus to build a parliamentary state without the domination of any one individual. With Bakiyev out and support from the major international powers, they have a unique opportunity to lead the country to economic recovery and representative government.

But the provisional government and its elected successor will have to work hard to earn back the trust of the Kyrgyz people.

Thanks in part to the Internet, which has made it easier for young Kyrgyz to form civil associations and keep one another informed, the Kyrgyz people have become more aware of government corruption. They watched as Bakiyev appointed members of his family to significant political positions and enjoyed the lion's share of US government largesse in exchange for the use of the air base at Manas, a vital resupply point in the war in Afghanistan.

Several times in the past two months, thousands have taken to the streets of major Kyrgyz cities to demand the release of political prisoners and an end to the government's harassment of the media: More than 60 journalists have been attacked since 2006 and at least two murdered. After electricity fees increased by 200 percent and heat by 400 percent over the winter, protesters demanded reductions in utility costs and called for Bakiyev's son, Maksim -- accused of embezzling at least $35 million from a Russian loan -- to leave the country.

Political activism does not come naturally to the Kyrgyz. Even after gaining their independence from the Soviet Union in 1991, they had a lingering fear of repression, little independent media, limited political speech and, above all, a lack of faith that citizen participation could bring about significant reforms.

However, recent events have encouraged dissatisfied citizens that public dissent is necessary and could be effective in the current climate. The Kyrgyz people must continue to press the provisional government to appoint public officials transparently and restart key institutions, including the constitutional court.

To address the country's most pressing challenges, the new government will have to develop a commitment to protect freedom of speech and independent media, as well as a long-term plan to jumpstart the economy, alleviate poverty and create new employment opportunities, which would provide a constructive opportunity for frustrated and unemployed youth.

Kyrgyzstan's Scarlet Revolution has not yet put an end to the country's cycle of turmoil. But thanks to the actions of Otunbayeva and her colleagues in the new government and the many citizens who have taken to the streets to demand a say in how it makes its decisions, the people of Kyrgyzstan have reason to believe that this time change is actually in the works.