This is one of the symbols of change following Bachelet’s historic tenure as the first female president of Chile -- a country where conservatism, tradition and machismo have long been thought to govern alongside our (invariably male) leaders. Yet last Thursday, Bachelet finished her presidency with an 84 percent approval rating, a level never before attained by a Chilean president.
I remember the first day this transformation became evident. It was the day Bachelet took office, March 11, 2006, when thousands of women took to the streets, smiling, confident and wearing the presidential sash over their clothes; all of us won, they said. But Chile’s political, economic and intellectual elites had a harder time coming to terms with Bachelet, and she had more difficulty earning their respect than that of the masses of men and women who voted for her.
In those early months, she was sometimes dismissed because of her physique (some called her la gordi, “the fatty”) or her leadership style. In whispers, Santiago’s powerful mocked her overt emotion and her talk of intuition, and questioned her intelligence and management skills. Some predicted that Bachelet would perform so poorly that Chile would not elect another woman for a long time to come. Others criticized her efforts to appoint a cabinet balanced between men and women. After all, they wondered, where would all those qualified women come from?
Her performance as our head of state has had highs and lows, triumphs and mistakes. The difficulties included the troubled introduction of an ambitious public transportation system, Transantiago, designed by the prior government; massive protests by high school students in 2006 regarding the quality of education; and strikes by various labor unions. But, even in the crossfire, she showed the strength and resolve to endure.
Beyond the missteps, her positive legacies will be long-lasting: More daycare centers were built during her presidency than ever before in our history; a reformed pension system is now accessible to parts of our population that have too often been left behind; a stronger network of social protections is in place for the poorest; as are laws dealing with violence against women. As for the global financial crisis of the past year, Chile was prepared because Bachelet had adopted fiscally prudent economic policies and stayed true to them.
Perhaps most important, Bachelet remained faithful to her personality -- maternal, affable, nonconfrontational. Even as defense minister, and later as president, she never compensated for her gender by becoming the toughest person in the room. She was our anti-Thatcher, not adopting but transforming the old male-dominated codes of power. She proved that women can wield power in a variety of styles. Hers was not the stuff of brilliant oratory or populist inspiration; it was warmth, closeness, empathy. The instant intimacy she forged with the public compelled everyone, from the lowest socio-economic classes to our most prominent chief executives, to admire her.
Even after the recent devastating earthquake in Chile -- when the response was marred by delays in aid, confusion over a tsunami alert and criticism that the military was not dispatched to the streets quickly enough -- she garnered high approval for her handling of the crisis.
Now, those who criticized her supposed sentimentalism are taking classes in emotional intelligence, while Chile’s politicians must all pass the “Bachelet test” (that is, having “heart” and being close to the people). Our major public and private institutions strive to show they have women in high positions, and if they don’t, they must explain themselves. Indeed, our new president, Sebastian Pinera, has received some criticism for appointing six female cabinet ministers out of 22 positions.
Much remains to be done to improve the lives of women in Chile and resolve many issues: salary discrimination, the dearth of women on top corporate boards and in parliament and the need for greater labor flexibility to address the balance between work and home. But symbolically and mentally, we’ve made a huge leap, thanks to Bachelet, and that is a great source of pride for Chilean women. In this small land at the bottom of the world’s maps, little girls now want to be president, and no one wonders if it’s possible.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| AMANDA PAUL | ![]() |
||
| Ukraine: a lost country | |||
| MÜMTAZER TÜRKÖNE | ![]() |
||
| The 52nd anniversary of May 27 | |||
| ABDULLAH BOZKURT | ![]() |
||
| Turkey and Mexico: Distant yet so close | |||
| BERİL DEDEOĞLU | ![]() |
||
| Yemen and beyond | |||
| ARZU KAYA URANLI | ![]() |
||
| On Memorial Day a few words to make your day memorable | |||
| ABDÜLHAMİT BİLİCİ | ![]() |
||
| Google kidnaps Gül! | |||
| CUMALİ ÖNAL | ![]() |
||
| Critical months for Egypt | |||
| GÖKHAN BACIK | ![]() |
||
| Erdoğan, Gül and Davutoğlu: the inner bargain on Turkish foreign policy | |||
| DOĞU ERGİL | ![]() |
||
| Qualities of power | |||
| İHSAN YILMAZ | ![]() |
||
| The Egyptian elections, Islam and Islamists | |||
| EMRE USLU | ![]() |
||
| Operational errors | |||
| MARKAR ESAYAN | ![]() |
||
| There is need for a new initiative | |||
| JOOST LAGENDIJK | ![]() |
||
| Europe can’t have it all. Or can it? | |||
| HASAN KANBOLAT | ![]() |
||
| Are Russian tourists being discouraged from visiting Turkey? | |||
| MELİH ARAT | ![]() |
||
| Handmade | |||
|
|
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||