21 July 2009 / AKŞAM DENİZ ÜLKE ARIBOĞAN,
Treatment without diagnosis winds up making problems more serious and more difficult to solve. It is generally the “reasons” for these problems that possess the clearest information which then points the way toward solutions.
For example, even thinking about trying to eliminate the Kurdish problem in Turkey without first considering the reasons for it is useless. And because incorrect diagnoses, and thus incorrect treatments, were applied beforehand, the new problem is now different from the original problem, in other words, the disease may have advanced. For example, we must be open to analyzing not only international balances when it comes to the “new Kurdish problem,” but also the nation's economic structure, social traumas, developing dialectic movement and other factors. To wit, when you are in a situation in which the problem is branching out, a single-centered treatment is no good.