It's not a space that will remain empty for long, and some of the ugliest currents in state politics already are seeping in. They'll soon have permission to function freely. The state's illegal immigrants -- 70 percent of them from Mexico -- are usually the target of choice when times get tough, and this year is no exception. Some of the same people who tore California apart with Proposition 187, a 1994 initiative that would have denied illegal immigrants state services had it not been held unconstitutional, are back for another turn at the wheel.
This time, they're raising funds to begin gathering signatures for a ballot measure that would deny welfare benefits to the 100,000 US-born children of immigrant parents who would qualify for public assistance if they weren't in the country illegally. The children, of course, are US citizens, and the proposal is almost certainly unconstitutional. Even so, it's probably only the first such measure that's going to surface. Given our dysfunctional initiative system -- which allows anyone with a few million dollars to hire professional signature gatherers to qualify virtually any measure for the ballot -- one or more of these dangerous and divisive measures is going to be decided in some future election.
Even the campaign to qualify the sort of initiative the anti-immigration factions now propose will be a wretched affair. In the state that is home to America's largest Hispanic population, such an effort to deprive mostly Mexican-American children of their rights as US citizens is bound to engender understandable resentment and fear. In some ways, it could be an even uglier affair than the Republican-backed campaign for Proposition 187, which alienated Hispanic voters from the GOP in ways that have reverberated through California politics ever since.
It's a prospect made all the more pointless by the fact that in one of the places where government still functions -- Washington, believe it or not -- realistic steps are being taken to address the actual issues involved with illegal immigration. The fact is there's little appetite in most quarters to uproot and deport the 11 million immigrants estimated to be living in the United States without papers. It takes very little imagination to foresee just how laced with multiple indecencies such a process would be. That's why most serious polls continue to show that a majority of Americans would favor some sort of "path to citizenship" for the 11 million without papers -- if the government simultaneously takes responsibility for seeing that their numbers are not constantly replenished.
Sen. Charles Schumer, D-NY, has said he will introduce a comprehensive immigration reform bill sometime in the fall. Meanwhile, the Obama administration has begun a low-key crackdown on employers, as opposed to mass roundups of their mostly blue-collar workers. The White House recently said it would require companies seeking federal contracts to check their workers' status against the computerized E-Verify database, which contains Social Security and other personal records. At the same time, Immigration and Customs Enforcement has begun systematically examining the records of companies in industries known to make regular use of illegal immigrants. The $150,000 fine recently leveled against Los Angeles-based American Apparel for employing 1,800 illegals among its 5,600 factory workers was part of that effort.
In other words, what we're likely to see is proposed immigration reform that addresses both the human reality of the illegal immigrants already inside the United States and popular anxiety over the issue's dimensions.
There will doubtless be a fight over Schumer's proposal; there always is when the question involves immigration. Still, it's something of a relief to see government actually working, as opposed to the willfully feckless mess that both parties have made of things in California.
The debate over Schumer's bill may take many turns, but none will be as bad as the viciously loony idea of stripping children of their rights as American citizens, a proposal that has crawled out of the inexcusable political sinkhole where Sacramento used to be. © Los Angeles Times, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| BERİL DEDEOĞLU | ![]() |
||
| Yemen and beyond | |||
| ABDULLAH BOZKURT | ![]() |
||
| Turkey and Mexico: Distant yet so close | |||
| ABDÜLHAMİT BİLİCİ | ![]() |
||
| Google kidnaps Gül! | |||
| İHSAN YILMAZ | ![]() |
||
| The Egyptian elections, Islam and Islamists | |||
| MARKAR ESAYAN | ![]() |
||
| There is need for a new initiative | |||
| EMRE USLU | ![]() |
||
| Operational errors | |||
| HASAN KANBOLAT | ![]() |
||
| Are Russian tourists being discouraged from visiting Turkey? | |||
| CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON | ![]() |
||
| The modern ‘Great Game’: women’s role and status | |||
| KLAUS JURGENS | ![]() |
||
| Back to the ’80s | |||
| KATHY HAMILTON | ![]() |
||
| Random acts of violence | |||
| MERVE BÜŞRA ÖZTÜRK | ![]() |
||
| Adding insult to injury in Uludere | |||
| NICOLE POPE | ![]() |
||
| Shifting responsibility | |||
| YAVUZ BAYDAR | ![]() |
||
| ‘Errorism’ | |||
| ORHAN MİROĞLU | ![]() |
||
| ‘Strategic vision’ | |||
| ORHAN KEMAL CENGİZ | ![]() |
||
| Turkey through Amnesty International’s eyes | |||
|
|
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||