|  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
May 28, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 17 July 2010, Saturday 0 0 0 0
BERİL DEDEOĞLU
b.dedeoglu@todayszaman.com

The burqa problem, the burqa problematic

Finally, the burqa will become a matter of criminal law in France, where this issue has been debated for some time. The lower house of parliament has approved, by a great majority, a ban on face-covering veils in all public places in France. The bill will go to the senate in September and if it passes, anyone who wears a full veil will risk a fine of 150 euros and anyone convicted of forcing someone else to wear it will risk a year of prison and a 30,000-euro fine.

Women who wear this sort of garb must think about whether the full veil is a practical dress choice given the circumstances of modern life and they should also discuss the consequences of giving the impression that they want to be invisible. In Europe, burqa-like veils don’t have the same connotation as headscarves and the former is generally perceived as the symbol of radical religious trends. Above all, the fact that the burqa has become a legislative matter in France and elsewhere in Europe deserves a thorough debate.

The French bill, as with its Belgian equivalent, is seen more than anything else like a step aspiring to punish the women. The fact that those who oblige women to wear burqas risk higher fines is probably justified through human rights principles. However, does France need an additional law on this? The current legislation seems to be sufficient to protect women when they claim to be put under pressure for one reason or another. The problem is that most people are totally convinced that Muslim women wear face-covering veils, or even headscarves, just because they are forced to wear them. No one seems to think that there may be women who dress like this because of their personal choices motivated by religious feelings and maybe these are not just ignorant, immature women who only think about making more babies. These laws probably limit some women’s free choices, which is a paradox in a secular democratic and pluralist environment.

Another problem about this ban concerns the “public area” dimension of the law. It is not a totally unfounded argument that burqas may become a security matter as they make people who wear them unrecognizable to others. Nonetheless, who can know for sure that a woman wearing a burqa sitting in a park, and not a random man shopping at the market, will place a bomb in the metro station later on? The desire to ban burqas in public places is probably the result of the French habit of ignoring what they don’t like. From this perspective, if these women stay at home, no one will see them; everyone will forget they even exist and the problem will then be “resolved.”

Nevertheless, this issue can’t be managed simply by confining these women to their houses. Fines will not make these women and their families more docile citizens. Besides, such legislation will certainly affect Muslim countries’ perception towards France and the distrust of Paris will grow stronger.

There are those in France who criticize this bill because they don’t see why a law is needed when there are less than 2,000 women in the country who wear face-covering veils. They are not wrong, but the problem is not about the numbers. Even if there is only one person concerned, the subject deserves debate because of the EU’s values, norms and laws. If it was the contrary, we would have to ask how many women wearing burqas are necessary to propose a ban.

It’s not too hard to understand why this matter is so important for the French people, and some of their reasons are even justified. However, such a ban can’t be the best option. Because excluding some people from social life and making them “invisible” may create bigger social problems in the future

BÜLENT KENEŞ BÜLENT KENEŞ
What befell Niyazi-i Misri in the past is happening to Fethullah Gülen now
EKREM DUMANLI EKREM DUMANLI
When a call for fairness and reason finds acceptance
ŞAHİN ALPAY ŞAHİN ALPAY
Uludere, test case for democracy in Turkey
EMRE USLU EMRE USLU
Are the Kurds mentally divorced from Turkey?
GÖKHAN BACIK GÖKHAN BACIK
Erdoğan, Gül and Davutoğlu: the inner bargain on Turkish foreign policy
MARKAR ESAYAN MARKAR ESAYAN
Taking lessons from previous experiences with the military
YAVUZ BAYDAR YAVUZ BAYDAR
Qualm
ÖMER TAŞPINAR ÖMER TAŞPINAR
A new phase in Syria?
İHSAN DAĞI İHSAN DAĞI
Turkish foreign policy: Time for a re-evaluation
SEYFETTİN GÜRSEL SEYFETTİN GÜRSEL
Poor-friendly economic growth and the AK Party
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
Missing women, missing opportunities
BERK ÇEKTİR BERK ÇEKTİR
Changes to incentives for investment in Turkey
MERVE BÜŞRA ÖZTÜRK MERVE BÜŞRA ÖZTÜRK
The 1960 coup: a final test for democracy
AMANDA PAUL AMANDA PAUL
Ukraine: a lost country
MÜMTAZER TÜRKÖNE MÜMTAZER TÜRKÖNE
The 52nd anniversary of May 27
Weather
City>>
ISTANBUL
Today Tue Wed
15C°
21C°
15C°
22C°
16C°
22C°