After Balyoz
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
25 May 2013 Saturday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 23 September 2012, Sunday 1 0 0 0
MÜMTAZER TÜRKÖNE
m.turkone@todayszaman.com

After Balyoz

The delivery of a final verdict in the coup plot case known as Balyoz (Sledgehammer) is indicative of Turkey having entered an advanced stage in terms of democracy. The court has done its best.

 It has concluded the case despite all threats, challenges and black propaganda for undermining and discrediting these trials. Recognizing this great success, which shows that nothing will be the same after this point, is important because of some certain challenges that the court has overcome during the trial period:

The first one: There are 360 suspects in the Sledgehammer coup case, and some of them were retired or active duty members of the Turkish Armed Forces (TSK). Active duty military officers who assume critical positions and who command tens of thousands of military personnel were tried. The army as a professional bureaucratic organization has come together in solidarity against the case. It was a dreadful situation for court members. During the hearings, the threats coming from the suspects, or some groups lending support to the Sledgehammer coup case suspects, attempted to exert pressure on the court.

The second: The coup plotters tried to derive public support for the Balyoz case. They wanted to increase the pressure that they exert on the court by lending political support. They wanted to use the families of military personnel to manipulate the public’s perception. Moreover, the case has been presented as one representing the secularism versus anti-secularism polarization in Turkey. Thus, the coup plotters have gained political support. A recent public opinion poll shows that 17 percent of Turkish society still finds military coups justifiable. Considering that this 17 percent supports the coup plotters being tried in the Balyoz case is a great example of the challenges that the court has overcome.

The support of the İstanbul Bar Association is a concrete example of this support. The association linked itself to the Balyoz case suspects and waged an ideological war instead of simply defending them in court. The lawyers representing suspects in the Sledgehammer coup plot trial boycotted the court and did not attend the hearings in order to extend the trial period.

The coup supporters wanted to associate the opposition to the case with an opposition to the government. They wanted to give the impression that it is the Justice and Development Party (AK Party) itself who is actually hearing the case.

The military coup attempt in question was made in 2004. The suspects are punished on charges of attempting to render the elected government dysfunctional. In short, the victim of the Balyoz coup plan is the AK Party government that still rules Turkey. If this plan had achieved its ends, the members of the government would have been the people to be arrested and tried. Although the government is the victim of the coup plan, they did not join the case as a co-plaintiff. In order not to contribute to the coup supporters’ strategy to create a political polarization, the government never intervened the case, and did not use its natural right. The debates surrounding the case prove that the attitude of the government was correct.

Retired or active duty military officials are charged and sentenced on a failed attempt to destroy Parliament and overthrow the government through violent acts. According to the plan, in order create a chaotic atmosphere that will pave the way for a military coup, Turkish military aircraft were to provoke Greek pilots by entering Greek airspace and bombs were to be placed in the courtyard of a mosque during the Fridays prayers. The thing that makes the case interesting is that every step concerning the coup plan has been officially recorded. Moreover, then-Chief of General Staff retired Gen. Hilmi Özkök, who testified to an İstanbul court as a witness in early August, admitted that the seminar went beyond its intended purpose and that he had the events investigated. In a nutshell, every detail of the aborted coup attempt has been documented and proven. This is why the final verdict of the court did not come as a surprise to anyone.

For the first time, Turkey tried a coup attempt that resulted in a conclusion. Now, those who want to stage a coup have to consider the risk of being tried. The conclusion of the Balyoz case is the biggest evidence of the fact that a military coup will not be staged in Turkey again. If Turkey can try the coup attempts, no one will dare to stage a coup.

Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
20 May 2013
‘Pan-Islamic thought in Turkey'
19 May 2013
The Syrian agenda
13 May 2013
Reyhanlı calculations
12 May 2013
New phase of politics
6 May 2013
AK Party's presidential system tactic
5 May 2013
The colors of Central Asia
29 April 2013
Winds of ‘ijma' beginning to pick up speed
28 April 2013
The peace plan
22 April 2013
Turkish separatism
21 April 2013
MHP’s resistance chips away at an opportunity
15 April 2013
Alevi Kurds' problem
14 April 2013
Is violence on the rise in universities?
8 April 2013
What do the Turks say in this all?
7 April 2013
Blessings, both given and received
1 April 2013
What does the public think?
31 March 2013
Political parties’ test with negotiation process
25 March 2013
The presidential system in chess terms
24 March 2013
A fresh start
18 March 2013
What does the MHP think?
17 March 2013
What will be the status of Kurds?
11 March 2013
Coups and negotiations
10 March 2013
Expectations
4 March 2013
What will happen if peace is attained in Turkey?
3 March 2013
The leak
25 February 2013
‘A new era has begun'
24 February 2013
How will peace come?
18 February 2013
As the Ergenekon case winds down
17 February 2013
The generals who are in prison
11 February 2013
Pardoning coup perpetrators politically
10 February 2013
The fourth judicial reform package
4 February 2013
High hopes
3 February 2013
Turkish and Kurdish nationalisms
28 January 2013
AK Party's election calculations
27 January 2013
Which way will the CHP go: left or right?
21 January 2013
Who seeks to vindicate the coup perpetrators?
20 January 2013
Do the Kurds want a state?
14 January 2013
Post-solution Turkey
13 January 2013
What will Iran do?
7 January 2013
Open negotiations with Öcalan
6 January 2013
Feb. 28 case is like a good action flick
31 December 2012
Political puzzle for 2013
30 December 2012
As 2012 comes to an end: MHP and BDP
24 December 2012
As 2012 nears end: CHP
23 December 2012
Parties toward the end of 2012: the AK Party
17 December 2012
War over constitutions in Arab Spring countries
16 December 2012
As the Ergenekon myth comes to an end
10 December 2012
Turkey-Egypt: Islamism to what extent?
9 December 2012
The politics of feeling
3 December 2012
Counter revolution in Egypt
2 December 2012
End of coups
26 November 2012
‘Magnificent’ politics
25 November 2012
Öcalan’s rise
19 November 2012
The Egypt-Turkey axis and Israel
18 November 2012
Politics and the death penalty
12 November 2012
After Atatürk
11 November 2012
Have the hunger strikes served their purpose?
5 November 2012
Enemies of the MHP
4 November 2012
MHP, just like it was
29 October 2012
Owners of the republic
22 October 2012
Democracy settles in Tunisia
21 October 2012
The anatomy of a coup
15 October 2012
The will of Said Nursi
14 October 2012
President and party ties
8 October 2012
As Turkey confronts coups: past and present
5 October 2012
Will negotiations resume?
1 October 2012
Is there something new?
30 September 2012
The new AK Party
24 September 2012
How are coups prevented?
23 September 2012
After Balyoz
17 September 2012
Islam and violence
16 September 2012
Secularism consensus in new constitution
10 September 2012
Signs of softening
9 September 2012
Will immunities be lifted for the BDP?
3 September 2012
Turkey’s Syria reality
2 September 2012
The front Syria is opening in Turkey
27 August 2012
Can negotiations with the PKK begin again?
26 August 2012
The PKK’s total war
19 August 2012
Peace for war
13 August 2012
The Ergenekon organization in Egypt
12 August 2012
Could Iran win?
6 August 2012
What is happening in Hakkari?
5 August 2012
Abdullah Gül has put on his boots
30 July 2012
Alevism as an issue of the state
29 July 2012
Islamism vs. AK Party
23 July 2012
Apolitical manifestations of religiosity
22 July 2012
What was changed by the CHP party convention?
16 July 2012
Delayed justice
15 July 2012
What is happening with the AK Party?
9 July 2012
Is Davutoğlu Enver Jr.?
8 July 2012
The Halki Seminary will soon be opened!
2 July 2012
Has the state crisis come to an end?
1 July 2012
Why are special courts being abolished?
25 June 2012
Morsi’s victory
24 June 2012
What does the PKK want?
18 June 2012
Who will become president?
17 June 2012
Will the Kurdish issue be solved?
11 June 2012
Is there judicial tutelage?
10 June 2012
Is a solution possible without the MHP?
4 June 2012
Reaching compromise with coup supporters
3 June 2012
Revenge
...