Reasons and aims behind the merger of HAS and AK parties
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
24 May 2013 Friday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 13 July 2012, Friday 0 0 0 0
MERVE BÜŞRA ÖZTÜRK
b.ozturk@todayszaman.com

Reasons and aims behind the merger of HAS and AK parties

In a surprising move on Thursday, ruling Justice and Development Party (AK Party) Chairman and Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan met with Voice of the People Party (HAS Party) leader Numan Kurtulmuş with an offer to merge the two parties.

The HAS Party has yet to make a decision regarding the offer, but a majority of columnists believe that it will accept and that the merger of the parties will serve to increase Turkey’s process of democratization as well as the AK Party’s power in the political arena.

Bugün’s Ahmet Taşgetiren thinks the two parties will most probably merge in the end and that it will be to Turkey’s benefit. It would be healthier in a political sense if there had been a strong opposition party from the right wing against the AK Party. Before the HAS Party, the Felicity Party (SP) had such a mission, but the AK Party’s dominant politics stood in the way of these two parties becoming politically stronger. And the HAS Party must have realized that there is almost no chance that they will be able to constitute a powerful alternative to the AK Party, which is why Taşgetiren strongly believes they are going to accept Erdoğan’s offer.

As for Kurtulmuş’s role in the AK Party, the Bugün columnist says rumors that Kurtulmuş will be a candidate for the party’s leadership role is quite a premature speculation and that such useless speculation can only weaken the party. According to Sabah’s Mehmet Barlas, if the HAS Party merges with the AK Party, it will be a win-win situation for both parties. But the party that will see the biggest benefit from this merger will be the AK Party. Remaining in power for 10 years batters and isolates a party, which is exactly what has happened to the AK Party. On the one hand, constant economic growth, reforms to substructure and superstructure, steps taken in terms of democratization, civilianization, freedoms and the Kurdish issue are huge achievements of the AK Party’s 10 years in power. However, on the other hand, Erdoğan’s “the only man” position in the party has caused the party to lose some support. As a result of linking the party only to one man, Erdoğan’s controversial statements and unexpected moves have recently made voters forget about the pros of the party. Also in a developing country like Turkey, even if you solve 10 problems, another 10 new problems tend to emerge. And even if you don’t plan to, “deep state reflexes,” where the ruling party appoints acquaintances to high positions, tend to influence a government after a 10-year period in power. In this sense, including the HAS Party will lead to a renewal in the AK Party and an opportunity for them to hear the public’s expectations, which they have been ignoring lately, Barlas notes. Describing Kurtulmuş “a man of character,” Barlas says he has known Kurtulmuş since his first day in politics and that he has always stood out as an independent and fair man who knows his responsibilities well and tries to stay away from demagogy.

As for the AK Party’s aim in offering to merge with the HAS Party, columnists argue that it aims to increase its votes and is also a mark of the AK Party’s respect for the party as Erdoğan is known to have a deep regard for Kurtulmuş and will thus most likely offer him an important position in the party. Milliyet’s Taha Akyol thinks that votes from small parties such as the HAS Party are not that important or influential for a ruling party, but what matters most here is the synergy that the union of the two parties will create. He also argues that Erdoğan is planning to further strengthen his party because in the event that he is elected as the new president, Erdoğan will be quite a powerful president, but on the other hand he can’t risk losing his party’s power. The offer made to the HAS Party serves Erdoğan’s aims of strengthening his party, he thinks.

Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
24 May 2013
Game-changer for Syria
23 May 2013
Syrian puzzle
22 May 2013
AK Party’s Plans B and C for constitution
21 May 2013
Alarm bells for CHP
20 May 2013
What did Turkey get from the Obama meeting?
17 May 2013
CHP's steady inconsistency
16 May 2013
Syria and terrorism
15 May 2013
Media ban was wrong move
14 May 2013
Intended message behind Reyhanlı blasts
13 May 2013
Reyhanlı blast
12 May 2013
CHP's fall
10 May 2013
Overcoming constitution dilemma
9 May 2013
PKK's choice
8 May 2013
Withdrawal begins
7 May 2013
For better democracy
6 May 2013
The core of settlement
3 May 2013
May Day failure
2 May 2013
Return of May Day riot
1 May 2013
Cooperation against settlement
30 April 2013
Reactions to the wise
29 April 2013
Turkey's social agreement project
28 April 2013
Expectations from the next stage in the process
26 April 2013
Withdrawal not a tactic but a strategy
25 April 2013
First stage of the settlement process
24 April 2013
Impartiality of the state, tragic events of 1915
23 April 2013
Why do they object to the settlement initiative?
22 April 2013
Kılıçdaroğlu's Pyrrhic victory
21 April 2013
Wise people's journey
19 April 2013
Nationalists' defeat of reformists within CHP
18 April 2013
Peace and democracy
17 April 2013
Suggestion of new method for constitution
16 April 2013
Another black stain on judiciary
15 April 2013
Reasons behind Kandil's reluctance
11 April 2013
Bahçeli’s attempt at provocation
10 April 2013
Right of resistance
9 April 2013
War of propaganda in Ergenekon trial
8 April 2013
Peace through grassroots mobility
5 April 2013
Turkey's opposition, an obstacle to settlement?
4 April 2013
More or less of a Turk?
3 April 2013
First peace, then democracy
2 April 2013
How should the PKK retreat?
1 April 2013
Including PKK in sphere of law
31 March 2013
New constitution embracing all ethnicities
29 March 2013
Controversial statement on citizenship
28 March 2013
Questions over the process of withdrawal
27 March 2013
Democracy for everyone, not only Kurds
26 March 2013
Diplomatic thaw with Israel
25 March 2013
Apology is product of Zeitgeist
22 March 2013
This Nevruz heralds peaceful springs
21 March 2013
Terror companies sharing PKK's clients
20 March 2013
Lack of support will be reflected at the ballot box
19 March 2013
Conflict between pessimists, optimists
18 March 2013
Drawing lessons from others' experiences
17 March 2013
Peace process a test for CHP?
15 March 2013
Will there be a price for laying down weapons?
14 March 2013
First token of good intentions
13 March 2013
Opposition's lack of maturity
12 March 2013
A democratization project
11 March 2013
Demands no longer enforced by arms
8 March 2013
Calls for action before truly celebrating Women's Day
7 March 2013
Risks of too much transparency
6 March 2013
Road to peace always thorny
5 March 2013
What is good journalism?
4 March 2013
Is it a provocation-proof process?
3 March 2013
Challenges of the peace process
1 March 2013
More sabotage, more calls for caution
28 February 2013
Too early for a sigh of relief
27 February 2013
Öcalan's failure in communication
26 February 2013
Test for Öcalan's authority
25 February 2013
Possible roadmap of peace process
22 February 2013
Presidential system under today's circumstances
21 February 2013
Violent protests in the Black Sea region
20 February 2013
Violent protests aimed at creating ‘Turkish issue'
19 February 2013
The dilemma of the new constitution
18 February 2013
Crucial balance of optimism and realism
15 February 2013
Error and essence of coup trials
14 February 2013
CHP torn between nationalists, peace initiative supporters
13 February 2013
Little known about deadly blast, many worries
12 February 2013
Political consensus on a new constitution
11 February 2013
Speculation over Erdoğan's visit
10 February 2013
EU, SCO no viable alternatives
8 February 2013
A sign of judicial activism
7 February 2013
The EU's challenges
6 February 2013
Turkey's pursuit of int'l cooperation
5 February 2013
Challenging steps of peace strategy
4 February 2013
Political test awaits Turkey
3 February 2013
More than an anti-American attack
1 February 2013
Vision Shanghai Five offers
31 January 2013
Güler's remark core of Kurdish issue
30 January 2013
The CHP's problems swept under the carpet
29 January 2013
Different stances in Mali and Syria
28 January 2013
Turning towards the East
25 January 2013
The CHP in contradiction with its leftist image
24 January 2013
Shadow cast over peace plans
23 January 2013
Paris killings get even more complicated
22 January 2013
Not Kurdish problem, democracy problem
21 January 2013
Good signs
20 January 2013
Turkey's struggle against its phobias
18 January 2013
First test on the long road to peace
17 January 2013
Six answers to ‘Why now'
...