Dark side of the moon
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
19 May 2013 Sunday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 02 May 2012, Wednesday 0 0 0 0
MARKAR ESAYAN
m.esayan@todayszaman.com

Dark side of the moon

Our generation should have guessed what I am trying to get at by using the name of one of Pink Floyd’s best albums, “Dark Side of the Moon,” in the headline. To state the obvious, I should note that there is a dark side to everything, in addition to its appearance. This title certainly becomes more meaningful for societies in which individualization is discouraged, transition to a more transparent system is problematic and which operate under illiberal and totalitarian regimes. In systems dominated by masks, secrecy, doubts and fears, realities tend to be pushed toward the dark side of the moon.

Turkey was such a society in the past. We can even say that despite the winds of change in recent years, we continue to stick to many of our old habits. There are lots of events that accumulated over time and were pushed to the dark side of the moon.

During the May Day celebrations held in İstanbul’s Taksim Square in 1977, a disaster occurred and 34 people died -- three shot to death and the majority crushed to death. This incident became a major milestone in the run-up to the coup of Sept. 12, 1980, which served as a significant fault line in the history of the country. Even the prosecutor has regarded it as one of the most suspicious incidents in the case and included it as a plot devised to create chaos and pave the way for the eventual military takeover in the indictment for the ongoing lawsuit against the two surviving generals of that coup.

The general conviction is that several snipers working for the “deep state” opened fire on the rallying crowd from the windows of a hotel -- currently the Marmara -- and from the rooftop of the [İstanbul]Waterworks Authority (İSKİ), and in the resulting panic people crushed each other.

This was what the general public believed about the massacre of May 1, 1977, and the “leftist” groups of Turkey rightfully produced an extensive narrative based on this victimization. For the left wing, which was the target and a sure loser in the Sept. 12, 1980 coup, this served to reinforce the legend of being beaten by a very powerful force.

Speaking to Belkıs Kılıçkaya from Habertürk on Tuesday, May 1, and to Ertan Altan on Wednesday, historian and author Halil Berktay voiced a claim that can hardly be considered novel and yet all hell broke loose.

Berktay was a former Maoist and was in Taksim Square on that day, and he recounted the incident as follows:

“In 1976, the May Day rally had been very crowded, and the rally had been conducted under the control of the Confederation of Revolutionary Workers’ Unions [DİSK], which was dominated by the Turkish Communist Party [TKP]. This, of course, aroused the envy of other groups. On the other hand, the TKP saw this as a stronghold, a paragon of sovereignty that must be protected. Therefore, the tension had already escalated between the rival groups ahead of the May Day celebrations in 1977. The tendency of the TKP and DİSK was not to allow any other political group to enter Taksim Square carrying the TKP’s or DİSK’s banners. In particular, they were determined to ban the groups which they referred to as ‘Gauchists’ or ‘Maoist Grey Wolves.’ In response, the rival groups such as the People’s Liberation, the People’s Way and the Turkish Workers and Peasants Liberation Army [TİKKO] would say, ‘We will enter Taksim Square and we will not abandon Taksim Square to revisionists even if we lose 10,000 people.’

“I think I had joined one of the groups at Beşiktaş and we were walking towards Taksim Square. The atmosphere was very tense. It was as if everyone was waiting for an incident to break out at any moment.

“Suddenly, repeated gunshots were heard from the direction of the Waterworks Authority. The People’s Liberation, the People’s Way, TİKKO and similar groups were trying to enter the square from that direction. They possibly hit DİSK’s checkpoint and a clash erupted between them. Someone started to fire their guns, either in the air or at certain targets. That snipers opened fire from the windows of the Marmara Hotel and from the rooftop of the Waterworks Authority is completely a lie, an urban legend.”

When Berktay narrated the incident as a witness, but without any evidence to support his case, many people reacted harshly and even launched a smear campaign and denigrated him. It is clear that we are still unable to discuss this incident, even though 35 years have passed since. Undoubtedly, this tension between the rival groups reinforces the possibility that the deep state might have stepped in to take advantage of it, and Berktay does not rule out this possibility either. But shouldn’t our normal reaction be to demand that the claims be investigated and the material truth uncovered?

I think this is what the main problem in Turkey is already: Every group has a totalitarian mentality of forcing other groups to accept its subjective narratives.

Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
17 May 2013
No libretto for history?
15 May 2013
Why all this violence?
12 May 2013
Turkey has to grow up
10 May 2013
Polarization and deep state
8 May 2013
Turkey's dilemma
5 May 2013
Getting rid of this shame
3 May 2013
What happened in Taksim on May 1?
1 May 2013
Is 1915 genocide or what?
28 April 2013
My father
26 April 2013
It's now democratization's turn
24 April 2013
Exit from a well 1,915 meters deep
21 April 2013
How should the events of 1915 be perceived
19 April 2013
This is almost the end for Kılıçdaroğlu
17 April 2013
All that is solid melts into air
14 April 2013
Without creating new ‘others'
12 April 2013
Will anything good come from Muslims?
10 April 2013
The price CHP pays for its stance
7 April 2013
As the CHP is dragged towards euthanasia
3 April 2013
Significance of new constitution for Turkey
31 March 2013
Gökçeada Greek Primary School and ghosts from the past
29 March 2013
The butterfly effect of the solution
27 March 2013
Leyla Zana's contribution to peace
24 March 2013
Hizmet movement and the peace process
22 March 2013
As the poisonous parentheses close
20 March 2013
If there was no Ergenekon trial
18 March 2013
CHP, not Turkey, will be partitioned
15 March 2013
Redeeming democracy
13 March 2013
CHP and peace
10 March 2013
The big peace gong has not rung yet
6 March 2013
Chemistry of and roadblocks to solution
3 March 2013
The provocations that have come to nothing
1 March 2013
When will big peace come?
27 February 2013
Kurdish politics on a test drive
24 February 2013
Logic of peace
22 February 2013
Are we really getting closer to peace?
20 February 2013
Transformation of nationalism
17 February 2013
Kurds, Muslims and neo-nationalists
15 February 2013
The CHP's İmralı ‘correction'
13 February 2013
Baykal coup in the CHP
10 February 2013
The dignity of politics and the deep state
8 February 2013
Opportunity for urban transformation
6 February 2013
Getting rid of the straitjacket
3 February 2013
Problems exhausted too
1 February 2013
Turkey's CHP problem
30 January 2013
Turkish issue and the CHP
27 January 2013
Kılıçdaroğlu's choice
25 January 2013
Why can't we postpone the reforming of the state?
23 January 2013
Paris killings and their wake
20 January 2013
A tough week
18 January 2013
Dink case and democratization
16 January 2013
Post-PKK Turkey
13 January 2013
The PKK issue and provocations
11 January 2013
Supreme Court head prosecutor: Dink killed by an organization
9 January 2013
Tragedy in Zonguldak
6 January 2013
The new process
2 January 2013
While the deep state waits…
30 December 2012
Polarization and stability
28 December 2012
The state apparatus resurfaced
26 December 2012
What is deep state?
23 December 2012
Coup changes appearance
19 December 2012
Human rights struggle in the new age
16 December 2012
As the state tries itself
14 December 2012
Search for common sense in AK Party
12 December 2012
What were in those reports?
9 December 2012
Let us make sure history does not repeat itself
7 December 2012
Turkey in past decade and past week
5 December 2012
The Kurdish issue and populism
2 December 2012
Turkey: a country of paradoxes
30 November 2012
What is Turkey’s role in the imminent comeback of the East?
28 November 2012
Why can’t we make a new constitution?
25 November 2012
Özal: Once again
23 November 2012
Where does Kenan Evren’s self-confidence come from?
21 November 2012
Gaza and three possibilities
18 November 2012
Price of delay: paid
16 November 2012
Mastering time and price of delay
14 November 2012
Death penalty debate and questions
11 November 2012
Golden Age or Stone Age?
9 November 2012
Key to a victory: politics of non-deception
7 November 2012
A radical package
4 November 2012
Özal and the Kurdish issue
2 November 2012
Changing the factory settings: thoughts on the AK Party and the Turkish Republic
31 October 2012
Continued reforms or chaos?
28 October 2012
Hunger strikes and political constriction
24 October 2012
Link between economy and democracy
21 October 2012
Murder of Christian missionaries and the deep state
19 October 2012
The importance of coup trials
17 October 2012
Why is EU membership important?
14 October 2012
We could have shared the Nobel
12 October 2012
EU progress report and recent times in Turkey
10 October 2012
A deus ex machina: Recep Güven
7 October 2012
No to war… but
5 October 2012
Turkish foreign policy and Syria
3 October 2012
Differences between two speeches
30 September 2012
Turkey's red lines
26 September 2012
Post Balyoz, pressure mounts on Court
23 September 2012
Turkey's future and the Balyoz decision
21 September 2012
Turkey’s military problem
19 September 2012
Kılıçdaroğlu’s Menderes visit
16 September 2012
Film provocation as the East returns
14 September 2012
Uludere, Syria, Şemdinli and the state
...