CHP in the headlines
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
26 May 2013 Sunday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 27 May 2010, Thursday 0 0 0 0
ANDREW FINKEL
a.finkel@todayszaman.com

CHP in the headlines

“What the headlines giveth, the headlines will take away,” is my best shot at translating the Turkish prime minister’s disparaging description of the meteoric rise of Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu, his new adversary and recently elected leader of the Republican People’s Party (CHP).
Mr. Erdoğan is, of course, referring to the strong support which the Doğan-owned newspaper group lent Mr. Kılıçdaroğlu. The CHP’s natural press allies flocking to support the new man would have certainly dissuaded the party’s old leader from believing he could stage a comeback. Does this mean, as Mr. Erdoğan suggests, that Kılıçdaroğlu is a one-day wonder, a creation of the media who has Humpty Dumpty’s chance of survival should the fickle press barons decide to give him a shove?

That Mr. Erdoğan’s jibe was itself the subject of banner headlines in those newspapers on which he and his own Justice and Development Party (AK Party) rely complicates the issue more than a little bit. We are staring into an infinity mirror created by a highly partisan Turkish press. It is fair enough that television and newspapers view the world through a particular optic, but the question is whether they hold those opinions out of conviction or because they are engaged in a battle for power and influence. Goodness knows I have criticized the Doğan Group in this column often enough, but goodness knows as well they are not the only ones whose credibility is often on the line. The AK Party has made great efforts to create a loyalist press, to the extent of getting state banks to finance the purchase of media enterprises for corporations on whom they can rely.

Not that long ago I cornered Cem Duna, who had a brief career as controller general of the Turkish Radio and Television Corporation (TRT) when Turgut Özal was prime minister. He entered the job on the understanding that he would create a truly non-partisan organization and was forced out because he succeeded beyond the government’s wildest dreams. When the party took stock of the reasons why they did poorly in the 1989 nationwide local elections, the two most commonly cited reasons were the image of the prime minister’s wife and the rogue independence of TRT. Mr. Duna was obliged to step down. He is also a former ambassador and perhaps too diplomatic to comment in detail on the work of his successors, but he was clearly skeptical that state-run television in Turkey was capable of producing an independent and critical voice.

So while it may be true that Kılıçdaroğlu has ridden a wave of popularity in part generated by the opposition media, many of those expressing outrage over this phenomenon enjoy the moral authority of pots calling kettles black. The government is itself very controlling over large swathes of Turkey’s Fourth Estate.

Let’s take a step back. The CHP under its new leader has a choice. It can either continue the old policy of defining a well-entrenched position on the Turkish political spectrum which will guarantee a rump in Parliament but never win it enough votes to have a chance of forming a government. Or it can make an attempt to recapture the same political middle ground that brought it to power decades ago. Mr. Kılıçdaroğlu’s donning of a cloth cap, the trademark of Bülent Ecevit, who brought his party to government in the 1970s, might seem a trifle kitsch. However, it does signal which option he intends. It is not an easy task. He needs to win new supporters without alienating a faithful core. However, it is not impossible, as Mr. Erdoğan himself demonstrated when he turned the AK Party into an electable party.

It may be the business of the government-leaning press to tie the shoelaces of the new CHP leader together before he gets off the starting block. However, it might be in the interests of the country if the media would at the very least allow Mr. Kılıçdaroğlu to reach his stride. Yes, he should be criticized if he fails to set out a new vision for Turkey. He does not deserve a free ride. At the same time, an increasingly divided and partisan media operates against the best interests of the public it is meant to serve.

Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
27 March 2011
Whose model is it anyway?
24 March 2011
Front-page news
22 March 2011
Libya and the fashionable vice
20 March 2011
The end of bunga bunga politics?
17 March 2011
A nuclear melody
15 March 2011
A story in search of a moral
13 March 2011
Ergenekon cooks with pomegranates
10 March 2011
A sense of hurt
8 March 2011
Justice on trial
6 March 2011
Scary stuff
3 March 2011
Whither Turkey now?
1 March 2011
Necmettin Erbakan
27 February 2011
Building a political base
24 February 2011
Ten years on
22 February 2011
Europe, MENA and the biggest fish
20 February 2011
How many wrongs make a right?
17 February 2011
The deep state changes its image
15 February 2011
Sex, drugs, the crocus and a bee
13 February 2011
Pınar Selek
10 February 2011
Kanal 84
8 February 2011
‘Do as I say’
6 February 2011
Coffee break
3 February 2011
Dominoes versus okey
1 February 2011
Right makes might and vice versa
30 January 2011
The politics of everyday life
27 January 2011
The murder of İstanbul
25 January 2011
How to win the next election
23 January 2011
Points on the political compass
20 January 2011
What a robust Turkey brings to the table
18 January 2011
Welcome to political hell
16 January 2011
Turkey’s greatest threat
13 January 2011
Hrant Dink and Gabrielle Giffords
11 January 2011
Whose history is it anyway?
9 January 2011
Tweeting for God and country
6 January 2011
The headscarf and Kurdish rights
4 January 2011
Third Bosporus bridge? Transport for lemmings
2 January 2011
Zero problems with bags
30 December 2010
And the winner is…
28 December 2010
Man or Woman of the Year
26 December 2010
Sarah, Orhan Pamuk and Europe
23 December 2010
Chipping away at the government’s lead
21 December 2010
CHP shoots an arrow in the air
19 December 2010
Uncovering Komitas
16 December 2010
A democratic election?
14 December 2010
Bad vibrations
12 December 2010
An organization in search of a logo
9 December 2010
Fire-fighting diplomacy
7 December 2010
Leaking accountability
5 December 2010
WikiLeaks in Turkey -- Cui bono?
2 December 2010
Wikileakioğlu
30 November 2010
WikiLeaks: a strange interlude
28 November 2010
The calligrapher’s art -- then and now
25 November 2010
Creeping past the threshold
23 November 2010
The Boron Syndrome
21 November 2010
Turkey do’s and Turkey don’ts
16 November 2010
A NIMBY approach to Ergenekon
14 November 2010
Ruminations on ruminants
11 November 2010
The president gets a prize
9 November 2010
Beltwayology
7 November 2010
We resemble ourselves
4 November 2010
The bomb in Taksim Square
2 November 2010
A columnist bites the dust
28 September 2010
The Stuxnet Worm turns
26 September 2010
Tophane
23 September 2010
Turkey’s Ground Zero
21 September 2010
The Hrant Dink Award
19 September 2010
Referendum 2010 (it’s how you play the game)
14 September 2010
The morning after
12 September 2010
The referendum and Sunday lunch
9 September 2010
Dead cats can bounce
7 September 2010
Yes or no
5 September 2010
İstanbul 1910, European Capital of Change
2 September 2010
Referendum: no longer a done deal
31 August 2010
The great smear
29 August 2010
Asil Nadir -- a moral tale
26 August 2010
Yes, Minister
24 August 2010
Accountability, the referendum and Lame-Brain Pete
15 August 2010
Referendum risk
12 August 2010
‘No, No, Recep’
10 August 2010
The reform paradigm
8 August 2010
It’s (almost) too darn hot
5 August 2010
A referendum on what?
3 August 2010
Turkey through the looking glass
1 August 2010
Change Turkey can believe in?
29 July 2010
Cameron comes to town
27 July 2010
Analyze this
25 July 2010
The new Turkey
22 July 2010
Recovering in time for elections
20 July 2010
Giving the Kurdish question an answer
18 July 2010
İstancool (And not Constantinople)
15 July 2010
St. Augustine and Turkey’s opposition
13 July 2010
İstanbul, UNESCO and paving paradise
11 July 2010
A tutorial on tutelage
8 July 2010
What about the Kurds?
6 July 2010
Houston, we’ve got zero problems
4 July 2010
A chat in a Brussels hotel
1 July 2010
The politics of resentment
29 June 2010
Turkey, Iran and regime change
27 June 2010
A sudden case of adolescence?
24 June 2010
The hard task of drawing the line in the sand
...