AK Party and people with religious sentiments
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
19 June 2013 Wednesday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 18 August 2008, Monday 0 0 0 0
HÜSEYİN GÜLERCE
h.gulerce@todayszaman.com

AK Party and people with religious sentiments

That the Justice and Development Party (AK Party) was not closed down was a warning to all groups in Turkey that they should read Turkey’s realities correctly. In particular, it has considerably impacted the religiously conscientious. Before making an assessment on this issue, I would like to recall the developments that paved the path for it.
The challenges in Turkey’s immediate vicinity show that had the Constitutional Court shut down the ruling party, Turkey would have been dragged into complete chaos. In addition to the state of frailty that our foreign policy would experience, our disrupted political stability would negatively affect the economy. This would deal the heaviest blow to the masses in the low-income bracket. Moreover, the Ergenekon case might be whitewashed, while the bureaucratic elites might gain opportunities for new moves against civilian authority. Politicians would be placed in the spotlight, and with a desire to regain heydays past, the media bosses would try to secure the backing of power sources to rule the country. Thank God none of the foregoing happened.

The AK Party is not like the rightist governments of the past. This party consists of members acting in harmony with each other, relying on one another, who have known each other for a long time and are bound to each other by a sense of teamwork. This government is not like the coalition governments of the former center-right or center parties, maimed by bargaining that got nowhere. More people than those who voted for it seek the continuation of this government, maybe for the sake of stability. It is my personal conviction that this will be confirmed by the results of the upcoming local elections.

As for the change in the minds of religious people, when Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, on a visit to Spain, had been brought to the agenda, I heard many people making the comment “This might not be a correct move to make.” With the support hastily given by the Nationalist Movement Party (MHP), the headscarf issue was introduced to Parliament as a package separate from radical constitutional amendments, and there was no time to give louder voice to this not-a-correct-move criticism. We all had been mesmerized by the possibility of a solution to this long-standing problem and concluded that everyone must give support to this move.

Now, after the decision by the Constitutional Court, this mesmerized mood has begun to disappear. Professor Hayrettin Karaman, one of the true opinion leaders of this country, who is considerably influential on the religiously conscientious, particularly those coming from imam-hatip schools, recently wrote an important article in Yeni Şafak. “Democrats and the people who love this country note that the country has been saved from disaster, and they are similarly giving advice to the government as to what it should do in the new term,” he wrote.

The second of four pieces of advice with which Karaman agrees is as follows: “Even if it was done with good intentions, and even if the majority of the nation supports such a change, it was wrong to accelerate the headscarf issue without treating it within large-scale constitutional amendments. The government should not repeat such errors and [should] refrain from statements, acts and moves that would provide opportunity to the contentious opposition that tends to produce tensions. The issues that have been made complicated -- due to the opposition’s attitude -- such as the headscarf, the coefficients applicable in the university entrance exams [and] the course on religious information should be frozen until they are solved through general normalization.” (Aug. 3, 2008). This is a golden piece of advice which tells us that we should solve the fundamental problems in this country through social consensus. Karaman’s words express sincerely that the intention of the religious is nothing but to ensure that a solution is found to all social problems.

This does not imply that they abandon their demands for furthering individual rights and freedoms and for having a more mature and advanced democracy. Rather, we reiterate the need for the process of normalization that will be realized through common sense and wisdom and which will be reinforced by the EU membership process.

Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
12 June 2013
Criticizing the AK Party
6 June 2013
Summary of Taksim
4 June 2013
The messages we can take away from Taksim
9 May 2013
Responses to concerns and worries
7 May 2013
Inevitable direction: Plan C
30 April 2013
Process of caution and vigilance
4 April 2013
What will the wise men do?
28 March 2013
Let's try peace, shall we?
26 March 2013
Wise men board a must?
19 March 2013
New Ergenekon scenarios
14 March 2013
Headscarved penguin
12 March 2013
What happens to the AK Party if Öcalan is released?
7 March 2013
Brainstorming on the leaked minutes
5 March 2013
What will be the result of the negotiations?
28 February 2013
Games begin to muddy process
26 February 2013
What if they don't listen to Öcalan?
21 February 2013
I am a nationalist
19 February 2013
What's happening in Sinop, Samsun?
15 February 2013
Is the prime minister being political or sincere?
12 February 2013
Prime minister's visit to Saygun
5 February 2013
Dialogue is not a jacket
1 February 2013
Presidential system on the horizon
30 January 2013
Shock waves not restricted to the CHP
11 January 2013
Paris assassinations and the İmralı processes
14 December 2012
A Muslim society no impediment to democracy
2 December 2012
Ergenekon is just the means…
20 November 2012
Gaza’s heavenly children
15 November 2012
Private university prep courses, opposition and TOBB
4 November 2012
Is it solely about Erdoğan and Gül?
23 October 2012
Does this mean there will be no new constitution?
19 October 2012
Do new things really happen in Ankara?
16 October 2012
Tragedy in Western Thrace
11 October 2012
On terrorism and crying
10 October 2012
Possibility of war, Iran and NATO
25 September 2012
The whole point is to get rid of the AK Party
21 September 2012
Will terrorism end? And other questions
19 September 2012
Traces of assassinations: from Özal to Erdoğan
14 September 2012
Which button was hit in Libya?
12 September 2012
TSK statements shed light on the truth
30 August 2012
Aug. 30, Ergenekon and our army
15 August 2012
Was Aygün really kidnapped by the PKK?
10 August 2012
You should ask the PKK
7 August 2012
A new era in government-TSK relations
31 July 2012
New foreign policy in new Turkey
26 July 2012
Strategic depth and romanticism
19 July 2012
Conservatism: What we were; what have we become?
17 July 2012
HAS Party merger and beyond
12 July 2012
How was our jet downed, really?
10 July 2012
Release of deputies under detention
5 July 2012
They will not be able to make football an arena for enmity
3 July 2012
What really happened with specially authorized courts?
28 June 2012
Do it, but listen first
26 June 2012
Syria trap
21 June 2012
Before entering Kandil
19 June 2012
Hopes for peace and Dağlıca attack
7 June 2012
The situation is now clear, but …
5 June 2012
Democracy, not ‘The community,’ will be undermined
31 May 2012
New trap for the AK Party?
29 May 2012
Things that dark sunglasses hide
24 May 2012
Uludere in all its urgency…
22 May 2012
Why do we need to ride on the EU bid wave?
15 May 2012
Is a semi-presidential system on the horizon?
8 May 2012
Good news from Prophet’s Way
3 May 2012
A Silivri trap for the AK Party?
1 May 2012
Trucks in Taksim and Susurluk
26 April 2012
No, you won’t be able to destroy and eliminate it
19 April 2012
The real reason behind Feb. 28
17 April 2012
The season for birds to sing…
15 April 2012
‘What, İbrahim, can be bad about this?’
10 April 2012
Could there be an army that has its officers killed?
5 April 2012
A Sept. 12 coup for Ergenekon supporters…
3 April 2012
Quran, the AK Party and the MHP
29 March 2012
Beware: it is a plot within a plot
27 March 2012
The closure of Özgür Gündem
22 March 2012
Why does Evren still think so?
20 March 2012
My eyes are set on shores far more alluring than your polemics
13 March 2012
ÇEV, Interpol, Sabancı murder…
6 March 2012
The new constitution has a bold owner
28 February 2012
Feb. 28 from a different angle
23 February 2012
Why is there such interest in ‘Fetih 1453’?
16 February 2012
Those who infiltrate the state
15 February 2012
Sabotage: government-Gülen movement relations
9 February 2012
MİT, the judiciary and the new constitution
7 February 2012
Islamic faction and democracy
2 February 2012
Don't treat TSK and junta as the same
26 January 2012
Diyarbakır skulls are proof of our sorrows
24 January 2012
As the mystery on the east of the Euphrates is resolved
17 January 2012
Thank you, Vice Adm. Sağdıç
12 January 2012
Greatest trick of pro-Ergenekon figures
10 January 2012
Saving Başbuğ…
5 January 2012
Why was the Uludere plot devised?
3 January 2012
Who devised the Uludere plot?
27 December 2011
Ergenekon, Sledgehammer, Sivas, Maraş…
22 December 2011
Is it possible to cover up the Ergenekon case?
20 December 2011
Will a new constitution be written?
15 December 2011
Is it really all that great that we are not yet in the EU?
13 December 2011
Letter from Van...
8 December 2011
The AK Party's match-fixing test
6 December 2011
The Sunnis' responsibility on the Alevi issue
1 December 2011
What do the Alevis want?
...
Bloggers