Who will topple Assad, and when?
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
19 June 2013 Wednesday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 17 February 2013, Sunday 2 0 0 0
İHSAN DAĞI
i.dagi@todayszaman.com

Who will topple Assad, and when?

It has been more than two years and the Arab Spring has not yet reached Syria in terms of a regime change. The fight against Bashar al-Assad has been going on without any success. The presence of a strong war machine at the hands of the regime and the use of it against its own citizens without mercy have contributed to the longevity of the regime. Besides the social base of the regime, a weak and disorganized opposition has strengthened the position of the Assad regime. Add the concerns of the locals and international community about “what will be next” and an expectation of continued bloodshed under the rule of the opposition forces -- worsened daily by the reports of the atrocities committed by the opposition forces -- then you will understand the reasons for the current state of affairs in Syria.

What is worse is that no regional or global power seems interested in the fate of the Syrians. The powers, including Turkey, that encouraged opposition against Assad have not provided what they promised, leaving the opposition fighters on their own without much equipment to topple a strongly armed central government. Syria is not a hot topic in Turkey, despite the fact that through cross-border shelling and terrorist acts the situation in the region has turned to be a destabilizing factor in Turkey. It has been understood that Assad may survive longer than expected and thus it is better not to put his departure as a test case for Turkey's foreign policy achievement.

As Saudi Arabia and Qatar do not have the means to induce Assad to step down but to provide the opposition forces with financial funds, many looked to the US to take the leadership to force the Assad regime to go. The inaction of the US administration last year was attributed to the presidential election. Once it is over, many expected the US would move to a tougher position on Syria and on its principal supporters, namely Russia and China, to ensure a transition in Syria.

The US certainly continues to work to put the Syrian opposition in order and try to persuade international supporters of the Syrian regime to stop their backing of Assad. The Obama administration will probably do even more politically and diplomatically in terms of showing its support for the opposition in Syria.

It is known that within the US administration there is a clash of views among those who propose a harder stance against Assad and a non-committed position. But it is important to note that even those who advise a tough line do not propose an active engagement amounting to a direct military intervention in Syria. It is becoming very clear that the US will not militarily engage against the Syrian regime, apart from providing military intelligence to the opposition forces.

It is important to note that President Barack Obama received the highest applause from the members of Congress in his State of the Union address when he promised the return of 34,000 US troops home from Afghanistan within the year. When he declared, “By the end of next year our war in Afghanistan will be over,” the members of Congress were up standing and cheering.

I think the last thing Obama wishes is to engage the US in another conflict in the Middle East. The prevailing mood in the country and Congress, as well as domestic priorities of the US, will not allow Obama to support even via NATO a military operation against the Syrian regime.

Will Assad go eventually? It is becoming very clear that international direct military help is not forthcoming for the opposition forces. Can they overthrow the regime on their own? I am not sure. This coming summer is probably the last challenge for Assad. If he survives the end of this summer, then he may launch a major offensive against the opposition. The outcome depends on the will of the opposition to continue its fight and the weapons it gets from its allies.

Anyway, the result so far has been the destruction of a country and a people.

Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
16 June 2013
What is behind the veil of conspiracy theories?
9 June 2013
Back to the ‘old Turkey'?
2 June 2013
Last resort: Building mosque in Taksim
26 May 2013
Not Islamism but postmodern authoritarianism
12 May 2013
What can Turkey do about Syria?
5 May 2013
Imprisoned by the state
28 April 2013
The PKK's gain
21 April 2013
The state and society in post-Kemalist Turkey
14 April 2013
Is the PKK resisting Öcalan's directive?
7 April 2013
To build a ‘greater Turkey' with the Kurds
1 April 2013
Are Turkish people ready for Kurdish peace?
24 March 2013
Pax-Ottomana for the Kurds
17 March 2013
A state in the making: Kurdistan
10 March 2013
Who can survive without the state?
3 March 2013
An oriental way to solve the Kurdish problem
24 February 2013
Greatest obstacle for a Kurdish solution
17 February 2013
Who will topple Assad, and when?
10 February 2013
Is Turkey immune to international criticism?
3 February 2013
Hierarchy of nations: Turks and others
27 January 2013
Turkey's quest for a Eurasian Union
20 January 2013
Kurdish initiatives compared: any difference?
13 January 2013
Competing strategies in the Kurdish question
6 January 2013
Is a Kurdish solution in sight?
30 December 2012
Why Turkey's liberals criticize the AK Party
23 December 2012
Imagining an AK Party society
16 December 2012
Will the Arab Spring be hijacked?
9 December 2012
Pursuing Islamism with democracy
2 December 2012
TV soaps: People's choices vs. state's choice
25 November 2012
A ‘revisionist power' that needs NATO's protection!
18 November 2012
From Nasser to Erdoğan: unfulfilled promises
11 November 2012
Friends who don't care about human rights
4 November 2012
Turkey's Kurdish conflict: pathways to progress
28 October 2012
Kurdish question and Turkish opposition
21 October 2012
What's wrong with the zero problems policy?
14 October 2012
Why the AK Party does not need the EU
7 October 2012
Ready for a war, but who will be the warriors?
30 September 2012
Talking to the PKK
24 September 2012
The end of a myth
16 September 2012
The new ‘other': the Kurdish political opposition
9 September 2012
The changing identity of the AK Party
2 September 2012
Can Turkey pursue an imperial foreign policy?
26 August 2012
What is the PKK trying to do?
14 August 2012
Re-securitization of Turkish politics?
5 August 2012
The future of the Kurds: democracy or partition?
29 July 2012
Good for the Kurds, bad for the Turks?
22 July 2012
Emergence of the ‘new AK Party'
8 July 2012
Who can solve the Kurdish question?
1 July 2012
Egypt and Turkey, military and democracy
17 June 2012
Kurdish solution by offering gifts
10 June 2012
The Kurds of the AK Party
3 June 2012
What is wrong with the AK Party?
27 May 2012
Turkish foreign policy: Time for a re-evaluation
20 May 2012
Changing positions in Turkish politics
13 May 2012
Public perception of coup trials
6 May 2012
Post-Kemalist tutelage
29 April 2012
What do the Kurds want?
22 April 2012
Can Barzani be a mediator?
15 April 2012
The end of military tutelage in Turkey?
8 April 2012
The fall of the generals
1 April 2012
Islam and the nuclear issue
25 March 2012
Resolving or managing the Kurdish question?
11 March 2012
Annexing Cyprus
4 March 2012
Is Kemalism an alternative to the AK Party?
26 February 2012
The paradox of the Assad regime
19 February 2012
Lessons for the AK Party and MİT
12 February 2012
Whose war is it anyway?
5 February 2012
AK Party’s new mission
29 January 2012
Europe: a Christian continent?
22 January 2012
Murder as a collective crime
15 January 2012
Racism, immigrants and the state in Germany
8 January 2012
General Başbuğ: Who was he?
1 January 2012
A difficult period for the AK Party
25 December 2011
The French disconnection
18 December 2011
A war America lost
11 December 2011
Reforming Europe, abandoning Turkey
4 December 2011
Why Turkey is for ‘regime change’ in Syria
27 November 2011
Dersim massacre as a civilizing project
20 November 2011
Abandoning the old paradigm in the Cyprus dispute
13 November 2011
Was Atatürk a dictator? Ask him
30 October 2011
Are the Islamists ready to govern?
23 October 2011
A burden for all Kurds
16 October 2011
New constitution: Is it possible?
2 October 2011
A post-Kemalist constitution for Turkey
25 September 2011
Are we ever closer to a Kurdish solution amid violence?
18 September 2011
Secularism for Arabs and Turks
11 September 2011
Israel’s missed opportunity
5 September 2011
Who will decide the future of Turkish-Israeli relations?
28 August 2011
Military as a national security problem
21 August 2011
Towards a Kurdish solution without the PKK
14 August 2011
The AK Party, 10 years later
7 August 2011
Has the military lost?
17 July 2011
What's next for Kurdish politics?
3 July 2011
What is the opposition doing?
26 June 2011
Judicial sabotage
19 June 2011
Why do people vote for the AK Party?
12 June 2011
Turkey the day after elections
5 June 2011
Why is The Economist afraid of democracy?
29 May 2011
Will the military come to rescue the secularists?
22 May 2011
Politics of elections, politics of change
15 May 2011
What people think of bin Laden and Assad
...
Bloggers