Political perceptions
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
19 May 2013 Sunday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 17 February 2013, Sunday 0 0 0 0
DOĞU ERGİL
d.ergil@todayszaman.com

Political perceptions

The Metropoll public opinion research agency recently conducted a study of the preferences of Turkish voters.

The first question inquired whether trust and support for political parties has increased or decreased in the last year. The Turkish public answered as follows: 33 percent of voters said their trust and support for the incumbent Justice and Development (AK Party) has increased. The same proportion of the electorate said the opposite, and 24.4 percent replied that that their attitude has not changed. Among AK Party voters, 16 percent said their level of trust and support for their party has decreased in the last year; 64 percent of Republican People’s Party (CHP) voters, 51 percent of Nationalist Movement Party (MHP) voters and 49 percent of pro-Kurdish Peace and Democracy Party (BDP) voters responded that their trust and support for the AK Party has decreased in the past year.

When asked about the CHP, 44.5 percent of all voters have lost trust and support for the party. Only 11 percent said their support has increased, while 31 percent said their attitude has not changed. Among the CHP voters 32 percent have declared that their trust and support for their own party has increased, while 22 percent said it has decreased.

Trust and support for the MHP among voters has increased for 15 percent of the respondents and has decreased for 34 percent of those surveyed. For 54 percent of MHP voters, their level of support for their party has increased, while 12 percent reported a decrease. The attitude of 31 percent of MHP voters has remained unchanged.

Trust and support for the BDP among the general electorate in the past year has decreased for 50 percent and increased for 3 percent, while there was no change for 22.5 percent. It seems that the BDP is the party that suffered the most in trust and support among all political parties. Even among its supporters, 29 percent declared that their trust and support for their party has decreased. Only 27 percent of BDP voters said that their support for their party increased in the last year, while 17 percent said their opinion has not changed.

Why?

When asked “What are the basic reasons why the AK Party has increased its share of the national vote in parliamentary elections to 50 percent?” the top answers voters gave, according to their frequency, were as follows: 1- It is trustworthy (9.2 percent); 2- It is successful (6.1 percent); 3- It is industrious and productive (6 percent); 4- Its support for the needy (4.7 percent); 5- Ignorance (false consciousness) of the people (4.6 percent); 6- Insufficiency of the opposition (4 percent); 7- Its economic success (3.8 percent);  8- Rapport with the people (3.7 percent); 9- Strength of its leader (3.3 percent). It is evident that the electoral success of the AK Party does not rest on a single factor; rather, it is a complex phenomenon.

When people were asked “Why can’t the CHP get enough votes to come to power?” the answers were as follows: 1- There is a leadership deficiency (9.1 percent); 2- It does not engender trust (7 percent); 3- Inter-party feuds and factionalism (4.8 percent); 4- Pursuing the wrong policies (4.4 percent); 5- Detachment from the people (4 percent); 6- Entropy and lack of political creativity (3.3 percent); 7- Inability of party administration and deficiencies in the overall organization (3 percent).

Finally, a seminal question was put to the public regarding the reasons for their party preference. The top answers are as follows: 1- Trustworthiness/honesty (16.4 percent); 2- Industriousness and productivity (7.8 percent); 3- Economic policies (5.9 percent); 4- Successful party organization (5 percent); 5- Its record on human rights, basic freedoms and democracy (4.7 percent); 6- Its leader (4.7 percent); 7- Future expectations and how the party relates to voters (3.3 percent).

These findings refute the general belief that people vote mainly because of their ideological leanings. Rather, the data indicate that their preference rests on their perception of how well they believe they are represented by the party and how powerful the party is in its ability to realize its goals. This is a rational choice. So all the rhetoric about ignorance, delusion or being bought off for a few kilos of rice by the AK Party seems to be grossly exaggerated, if not misleading.

Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
19 May 2013
Syria between a rock and a hard place
14 May 2013
Syria exploding
12 May 2013
Awakening
7 May 2013
Iraq in turmoil (1)
5 May 2013
Questions and sincerity
30 April 2013
Poisonous questions
28 April 2013
Pride and Prejudice
23 April 2013
Scenes from Central Anatolia
21 April 2013
Official vs. Civic
16 April 2013
Iraqi Turkmens
14 April 2013
Oh Kurd (2)
9 April 2013
Oh Kurd (1)
7 April 2013
Oh Turk, (2)
2 April 2013
Oh Turk,
31 March 2013
Syria and Kurds
26 March 2013
Israel's apology
24 March 2013
Time to celebrate
19 March 2013
Meltdown
17 March 2013
A new phase in globalization
12 March 2013
A day for women
10 March 2013
EU membership: realities and aspirations
5 March 2013
The leak and the aftermath
3 March 2013
Where to tap?
26 February 2013
Syrian stalemate and the tragedy of inaction
24 February 2013
Presidency and the ‘grand peace’ offer
19 February 2013
Hope and caution
17 February 2013
Political perceptions
12 February 2013
Europe vs. Asia; elite vs. public
10 February 2013
Scenarios in the Syrian conflict
5 February 2013
Assessment of political and economic trends
3 February 2013
From Brussels to Shanghai
29 January 2013
Egypt and Iran
27 January 2013
‘Open Networks, Closed Regimes’
22 January 2013
Kurdish landscape is bustling
20 January 2013
Dividends of peace
15 January 2013
Peace with the dragon
13 January 2013
Dangers ahead
8 January 2013
Changes and challenges to understanding the Kurdish problem
6 January 2013
New year, new constitution?
1 January 2013
The 8 most interesting things we learned in 2012
30 December 2012
A 2012 account of Turkish foreign policy
25 December 2012
Interesting developments
23 December 2012
Iraqi prospects in Kurdish parentheses
18 December 2012
Turkey’s popularity in the Middle East
16 December 2012
Civil war in words and deeds
11 December 2012
Suicides in the army
9 December 2012
The pro-coup makeup in our DNA
4 December 2012
The secret army
2 December 2012
Violence against women
27 November 2012
The Kurdish house
25 November 2012
After the hunger strikes
20 November 2012
Is this a war?
18 November 2012
Life is a mirror: You get what you give
13 November 2012
Remembering and contemplating Atatürk
11 November 2012
Ending hunger strikes and political folly
6 November 2012
Elections and US foreign policy debate
23 October 2012
A slightly different competition
21 October 2012
Syria tough test for goals of ex-Ottomans
16 October 2012
Strategic depth (1)
9 October 2012
On war
7 October 2012
Another name for Syria: uncertainty
2 October 2012
Regional dynamics at play at the AKP congress
30 September 2012
The AKP congress
25 September 2012
Turkey, Israel and Egypt
23 September 2012
Systemic flaws
18 September 2012
On extremism
16 September 2012
Shadow boxing
11 September 2012
Tenacity of Syrian regime
9 September 2012
Questions and prejudices
4 September 2012
The Syrian enigma
2 September 2012
A bold new world?
28 August 2012
Here we stand?
26 August 2012
Questioning the Kurdish question
21 August 2012
US elections frivolous games
19 August 2012
One more time
14 August 2012
Syrian challenges
12 August 2012
Turkey’s Kurdish imbroglio as seen from outside
7 August 2012
Brotherhood?
5 August 2012
Syria unfolding
31 July 2012
Syria and Turkey: a friendship that went astray
29 July 2012
Whither goes the regime change in Syria
24 July 2012
Two-tier war in Syria
22 July 2012
Living with the hegemon
17 July 2012
Differing official rhetoric and common problems
15 July 2012
Turkey in the Syrian ‘problem’
10 July 2012
Strangers in their own land
8 July 2012
Russia and Israel on Syria
3 July 2012
The princess and the phoenix
1 July 2012
Reciprocity
26 June 2012
An intricate strategy
24 June 2012
Egypt’s hijacked spring
19 June 2012
Hopeful developments
17 June 2012
Dynamics of the Syrian conflict
12 June 2012
Kurdish issue redux
10 June 2012
The other world
5 June 2012
The abortion debate and beyond
3 June 2012
Conquest and discovery
29 May 2012
NATO’S near future
27 May 2012
Qualities of power
22 May 2012
Understanding the root causes
...