The ideal but difficult mix for the Turkish economy
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
19 June 2013 Wednesday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 01 February 2013, Friday 0 0 0 0
SEYFETTİN GÜRSEL
s.gursel@todayszaman.com

The ideal but difficult mix for the Turkish economy

A few months ago we were discussing the new system of compulsory education, summarized by the famous formula 4+4+4. This time, a new formula, 5+5+5, seems to be becoming an attractive subject of debate among economists interested in the Turkish economy. The formula expresses simply stabilizing inflation at 5 percent, achieving an average growth rate of 5 percent in the coming years and limiting the ratio of the current account deficit (CAD) to gross domestic product (GDP) at 5 percent.

We owe the formula to Turkish Central Bank Governor Erdem Başçı. Responding to a question from a journalist about his recent award as “the central banker of the year” by The Banker, Mr. Başçı said that “he will accept the congratulations only when the 5 percent inflation target is reached and is durable, when growth stabilizes around 5 percent and the CAD to GDP ratio decreases to 5 percent.” Giving the estimated potential growth rate of the Turkish economy at around 5 percent and giving estimations regarding the sustainable CAD to GDP ratio for the Turkish economy at something between 3 and 6 percent, I can say that the 5+5+5 formula is definitely the ideal mix for Turkish economy. Indeed, an average real growth rate of 5 percent will allow a per capita income at $25,000 by 2023 as was pointed out by Mr. Başçı in a recent conference. Stabilizing inflation at 5 percent would not be a definitive achievement regarding price stability but in any case, it can prevent the Turkish lira from becoming overvalued. Finally, the 5 percent CAD to GDP ratio could be considered quite sustainable given the potential of the Turkish economy to attract enough foreign direct investment.

Nevertheless, the critical question is if government and the central bank are capable of bringing about the 5+5+5 formula. I am rather pessimistic about it. During his presentation of the first Inflation Report of the year (Jan. 29) Governor Başçı insisted that the year end inflation would be very close (5.3 percent) to the target (5 percent), and it is expected to be 4.9 percent in 2014. I think that these forecasts are quite realistic. The central bank has developed and implemented new policy tools powerful enough to prevent excessive credit expansion as well as the overvaluation of the Turkish lira. Nowadays, private consumption and investment shows signs of revival. This year a mild positive contribution of domestic demand to growth must be expected. There is no reason, at least for the moment, to suspect a populist drift in the fiscal discipline given the budget performance of 2012 and the planned budget deficit for this year. I should add that no oil price shock is expected in the foreseeable future. So, we can feel enough comfortable regarding the 5 percent inflation target.

The problem lies regarding the growth and CAD targets. Governor Başçı forecasts a CAD around 6.5 percent for 2012 (down from 10 percent in 2011) and says that the deficit can go down to 5 percent this year. Regarding the 2012 deficit, there is a general consensus among forecasters that it will be less than 7 percent. But Mr. Başçı is too optimistic for 2013. Personally, I expect a reversal in the CAD decrease this year. The OECD also has the same expectation. The reason is simple: The almost common growth forecast at 4 percent and over for 2013 is largely based on the domestic demand revival. However, the sizable decrease in the CAD in 2012 was widely due to the positive contribution of net exports to growth. In 2012, exports grew about 11 percent, while imports decreased about 2 percent. So, the external adjustment was quite impressive but the growth rate was limited to less than 3 percent. Now, the question is, how can we go smoothly from a 6.5 percent CAD to 5 percent? Certainly not going back to a growth regime mostly led by domestic demand. I forecast a CAD to GDP ratio of around 7 percent this year.

To summarize, the Turkish economy faces a kind of “impossible trinity.” The inflation rate can be stabilized at around 5 percent with a growth rate close to 5 percent. But, the rebalancing process experience of last year shows that we have not yet discovered a way of keeping growth sufficiently high and based mostly on exports. As I have repeated frequently in this column, the Turkish economy is squeezed between a low but sustainable growth, in the sense of a sustainable CAD, and sufficient growth but an unsustainable CAD.

Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
17 June 2013
The economic effects of Gezi Park
14 June 2013
AK Party and the West
10 June 2013
Misperceptions can be very costly
7 June 2013
Will Gezi Park protest be a turning point?
3 June 2013
A tax reform of calculated timidity
31 May 2013
OECD forecasts low growth for Turkey
27 May 2013
A futile debate on alcohol
24 May 2013
What strategy could be better for the AK Party?
20 May 2013
A European socialist view of the CHP
17 May 2013
Employment increases despite low growth
13 May 2013
Working women and the headscarf
10 May 2013
Interesting questions on Turkish economy
6 May 2013
‘Eurozone is on the brink of collapse'
3 May 2013
Amalgams should be avoided
29 April 2013
Structural features of unemployment
26 April 2013
Peace process going well but not the economy
22 April 2013
Material deprivation among children
19 April 2013
Limits of monetary policy
15 April 2013
The gas of the east Mediterranean
12 April 2013
A modest revival in sight
8 April 2013
Working children
5 April 2013
Central bank facing trade-offs
1 April 2013
Hard landing is confirmed
29 March 2013
A surprising upgrade
25 March 2013
An outcome fraught with consequences
22 March 2013
Peace dividends
18 March 2013
Are the brakes burning?
15 March 2013
Unemployment is still on a rising trend
11 March 2013
Something is being plotted over Cyprus
8 March 2013
Huge regional disparities in unemployment
4 March 2013
Is education a panacea?
1 March 2013
Productivity or employment
25 February 2013
Neither working nor studying
22 February 2013
‘Women hold up half the sky' -- Mao Zedong
18 February 2013
Female employment, as well as unemployment, greatly increased
15 February 2013
More children will not solve aging population problem
11 February 2013
Worries on economic growth
8 February 2013
Once again on the presidential debate
4 February 2013
Fears of ageing population
1 February 2013
The ideal but difficult mix for the Turkish economy
28 January 2013
Uncertainty regarding EU membership is increasing
25 January 2013
‘Informality' in the Turkish labor market
21 January 2013
Bid for regional power could be realized through peace
18 January 2013
Too little growth, too much employment
14 January 2013
Undesirable tradeoff
11 January 2013
Erdem Başçı, central banker of the year
7 January 2013
How bad is it going in Europe?
4 January 2013
Pro-coup mindset waiting for AK Party's failure in economics
31 December 2012
Two scenarios for the Turkish economy in 2013
28 December 2012
The year of rebalancing
24 December 2012
‘Confusing' policies of the Turkish Central Bank
21 December 2012
Turkish schools abroad: a global phenomenon
17 December 2012
Unemployment up as expected
14 December 2012
Kurdistan oil: a strategic shift
11 December 2012
Growth: Lower than expected
6 December 2012
Debt crisis as seen from Greece
3 December 2012
OECD is rather optimistic on the Turkish economy
30 November 2012
Greece's ‘dark period' not over yet
26 November 2012
European turmoil's and the Turkish accession
22 November 2012
Why can't credit rating agencies agree?
19 November 2012
Too much focus on presidential election is dangerous
16 November 2012
Two bad, one good news item
12 November 2012
Income inequality in Turkey
9 November 2012
Upgrading Turkey
5 November 2012
Depreciation is hardly a tool for competitiveness
1 November 2012
AK Party decade from a historical perspective
29 October 2012
World Savings Day
24 October 2012
Reshaping EU presents new opportunity for Turkey
22 October 2012
Housing prices in Turkey
18 October 2012
Unemployment can be headache for government
15 October 2012
Turkey-EU relations need new perspective
11 October 2012
Is the new roadmap credible?
8 October 2012
The risk Syria poses to the Turkish economy
4 October 2012
AK Party's 2023 vision
1 October 2012
Not much room to maneuver
27 September 2012
Electoral system reform
24 September 2012
Looking for the right policy mıx
16 September 2012
Poverty in Turkey
10 September 2012
Second quarter confirms worries about low growth
3 September 2012
BRICS a challenge to the supremacy of the West
27 August 2012
Turkish bourgeoisie according to Orhan Pamuk
12 August 2012
Severance pay reform
5 August 2012
Demographic dynamics, aging populations and Turkey
31 July 2012
Republican People's Party has no economic strategy
22 July 2012
Long term growth perspectives for Turkey
15 July 2012
Austerity policies in jeopardy
8 July 2012
The unpleasant low growth perspective
1 July 2012
Dangers on Turkey's road to becoming a real regional power
24 June 2012
The European deadlock
17 June 2012
Babacan is decided on fiscal discipline
10 June 2012
A revolutionary program for Greece
3 June 2012
Sluggish growth and AK Party rule
27 May 2012
Pro-poor economic growth and the AK Party
20 May 2012
What should we do with a president elected by a general vote?
13 May 2012
Open letter to French President Hollande
6 May 2012
Is Standard & Poor's so wrong?
29 April 2012
On employment and labor market reforms
22 April 2012
Economic background of military coups
15 April 2012
Signs of a slowdown
8 April 2012
Investment incentives arrived at right moment
...
Bloggers