Presidential system on the horizon
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
19 May 2013 Sunday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 01 February 2013, Friday 0 0 0 0
HÜSEYİN GÜLERCE
h.gulerce@todayszaman.com

Presidential system on the horizon

Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has finally announced his Plan B. In a recent speech at a party group meeting at the Parliament, he for the first time referred to a timeline for writing the country's new constitution. In case consensus is not reached in Parliament, he said his own Justice and Development Party (AK Party) would go on with their own draft constitution. He further stated: “Our hope is that this mission is accomplished by the end of March.

If not, the AK Party's draft will be referred to the Parliament. At the moment we attract the support we desire in Parliament, we will bring this to the agenda. And when we meet the requirements for a referendum, we will take this matter to the people for a vote.”

It is obvious that opposition parties would raise objections to the presidential system and the AK Party play its role as an ardent supporter. In a program hosted by Yiğit Bulut on Kanal 24 TV on Friday, the prime minister said that his party would insert their proposal on the presidential system into their draft of the constitution and refer it to Parliament. The prime minister's remarks on the program are indicative of his decisiveness on this matter. Why is Erdoğan rushing to the presidential system? He is rushing because the presidential election will be held on Aug. 14, 2014. There will most probably be a referendum process before the election, as well.

Prime Minister Erdoğan believes that the presidential system will strengthen the country's parliamentary democracy. He notes that they do not want an unchecked presidential system and that a more effective system of checks and balances would be established. Erdoğan also targeted the entrenched bureaucracy: “Currently, bureaucrats are the ones who examine legislation. They also oversee the execution [of legislation]. The situation creates difficulties for us. These appointed figures regulate us, which is not a proper mechanism [for checks and balances]. It is like they are vying to create obstacles for us. I want to do my job, but I'm encountering these obstacles.”

It is easy to predict that there will be further excitement in the efforts to rewrite the constitution. The parliamentary drafting commission continues its work on the section concerning fundamental rights and freedoms. The second drafting commission will begin writing a draft of the section on social and economic rights. Even if the problems relevant to this part of the process are overcome, it is certain that there will be deadlock over the proposals for the presidential system. The agenda will move again to this subject when the AK Party announces its proposal on presidential system. For instance, the Prime Minister says that Turkey has something to learn from other countries governed by the presidential system, and by doing so they would be able to attain a Turkish-style presidential system. It is a matter of curiosity as to what a presidential system peculiar to us would be.

Now we have two months ahead of us. In other words, the AK Party will seize the initiative starting on the first day of April. The İmralı process that has begun to eliminate terrorism and violence, through negotiations between the country's largest terrorist group and the government, will be accompanied by discussions on the presidential system. The peace that will result from the successful conclusion of these talks will strengthen the position of Prime Minister Erdoğan and in this way, he could gain the support necessary in Parliament to take the presidential system to a referendum.

As is known, in order to bring constitutional amendments to a referendum, the support of 330 to 367 deputies is needed. At this stage, the breakdown in Parliament is as follows: AK Party, 326; Republican People's Party (CHP), 134; National Movement Party (MHP), 52; Peace and Democracy Party (BDP), 29; and independents, 7.

The parliament speaker is not allowed to cast a vote; this means that the AK Party needs the support of five additional deputies. If the İmralı process concludes with peace, the BDP may extend this crucial support.

In this case, a referendum is on the horizon. Another reason Erdoğan is asking for the referendum is his eagerness to attract greater popular support before the presidential elections. If the AK Party becomes successful in its plans and ambitions, there is a presidential system on the horizon. 2013 will be an important year.

Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
9 May 2013
Responses to concerns and worries
7 May 2013
Inevitable direction: Plan C
30 April 2013
Process of caution and vigilance
4 April 2013
What will the wise men do?
28 March 2013
Let's try peace, shall we?
26 March 2013
Wise men board a must?
19 March 2013
New Ergenekon scenarios
14 March 2013
Headscarved penguin
12 March 2013
What happens to the AK Party if Öcalan is released?
7 March 2013
Brainstorming on the leaked minutes
5 March 2013
What will be the result of the negotiations?
28 February 2013
Games begin to muddy process
26 February 2013
What if they don't listen to Öcalan?
21 February 2013
I am a nationalist
19 February 2013
What's happening in Sinop, Samsun?
15 February 2013
Is the prime minister being political or sincere?
12 February 2013
Prime minister's visit to Saygun
5 February 2013
Dialogue is not a jacket
1 February 2013
Presidential system on the horizon
30 January 2013
Shock waves not restricted to the CHP
11 January 2013
Paris assassinations and the İmralı processes
14 December 2012
A Muslim society no impediment to democracy
2 December 2012
Ergenekon is just the means…
20 November 2012
Gaza’s heavenly children
15 November 2012
Private university prep courses, opposition and TOBB
4 November 2012
Is it solely about Erdoğan and Gül?
23 October 2012
Does this mean there will be no new constitution?
19 October 2012
Do new things really happen in Ankara?
16 October 2012
Tragedy in Western Thrace
11 October 2012
On terrorism and crying
10 October 2012
Possibility of war, Iran and NATO
25 September 2012
The whole point is to get rid of the AK Party
21 September 2012
Will terrorism end? And other questions
19 September 2012
Traces of assassinations: from Özal to Erdoğan
14 September 2012
Which button was hit in Libya?
12 September 2012
TSK statements shed light on the truth
30 August 2012
Aug. 30, Ergenekon and our army
15 August 2012
Was Aygün really kidnapped by the PKK?
10 August 2012
You should ask the PKK
7 August 2012
A new era in government-TSK relations
31 July 2012
New foreign policy in new Turkey
26 July 2012
Strategic depth and romanticism
19 July 2012
Conservatism: What we were; what have we become?
17 July 2012
HAS Party merger and beyond
12 July 2012
How was our jet downed, really?
10 July 2012
Release of deputies under detention
5 July 2012
They will not be able to make football an arena for enmity
3 July 2012
What really happened with specially authorized courts?
28 June 2012
Do it, but listen first
26 June 2012
Syria trap
21 June 2012
Before entering Kandil
19 June 2012
Hopes for peace and Dağlıca attack
7 June 2012
The situation is now clear, but …
5 June 2012
Democracy, not ‘The community,’ will be undermined
31 May 2012
New trap for the AK Party?
29 May 2012
Things that dark sunglasses hide
24 May 2012
Uludere in all its urgency…
22 May 2012
Why do we need to ride on the EU bid wave?
15 May 2012
Is a semi-presidential system on the horizon?
8 May 2012
Good news from Prophet’s Way
3 May 2012
A Silivri trap for the AK Party?
1 May 2012
Trucks in Taksim and Susurluk
26 April 2012
No, you won’t be able to destroy and eliminate it
19 April 2012
The real reason behind Feb. 28
17 April 2012
The season for birds to sing…
15 April 2012
‘What, İbrahim, can be bad about this?’
10 April 2012
Could there be an army that has its officers killed?
5 April 2012
A Sept. 12 coup for Ergenekon supporters…
3 April 2012
Quran, the AK Party and the MHP
29 March 2012
Beware: it is a plot within a plot
27 March 2012
The closure of Özgür Gündem
22 March 2012
Why does Evren still think so?
20 March 2012
My eyes are set on shores far more alluring than your polemics
13 March 2012
ÇEV, Interpol, Sabancı murder…
6 March 2012
The new constitution has a bold owner
28 February 2012
Feb. 28 from a different angle
23 February 2012
Why is there such interest in ‘Fetih 1453’?
16 February 2012
Those who infiltrate the state
15 February 2012
Sabotage: government-Gülen movement relations
9 February 2012
MİT, the judiciary and the new constitution
7 February 2012
Islamic faction and democracy
2 February 2012
Don't treat TSK and junta as the same
26 January 2012
Diyarbakır skulls are proof of our sorrows
24 January 2012
As the mystery on the east of the Euphrates is resolved
17 January 2012
Thank you, Vice Adm. Sağdıç
12 January 2012
Greatest trick of pro-Ergenekon figures
10 January 2012
Saving Başbuğ…
5 January 2012
Why was the Uludere plot devised?
3 January 2012
Who devised the Uludere plot?
27 December 2011
Ergenekon, Sledgehammer, Sivas, Maraş…
22 December 2011
Is it possible to cover up the Ergenekon case?
20 December 2011
Will a new constitution be written?
15 December 2011
Is it really all that great that we are not yet in the EU?
13 December 2011
Letter from Van...
8 December 2011
The AK Party's match-fixing test
6 December 2011
The Sunnis' responsibility on the Alevi issue
1 December 2011
What do the Alevis want?
29 November 2011
Why the Alevis just cannot give up on the CHP?
22 November 2011
Dersim and the derailment of tutelage
17 November 2011
Ergenekon case rattles PKK
...